Comparative Analysis of Crestal Bone Levels of Basal Implants and Conventional Implants: A Clinico Radiological Study
Introduction: This study presents a comparative analysis of crestal bone levels, keratinized gingiva width (KGW), and gingival thickness (BGT) between basal and conventional dental implants over a 6-month period in the mandibular posterior region. Materials and Methods: A total of 20 patients were d...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2024-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1164_24 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841543530251550720 |
---|---|
author | Kshitibhushan Singh Pandaw Sachin K Malagi Dennis V Abraham Saurabh Tembhurne Sneha Banerjee Arundhuti Mahato |
author_facet | Kshitibhushan Singh Pandaw Sachin K Malagi Dennis V Abraham Saurabh Tembhurne Sneha Banerjee Arundhuti Mahato |
author_sort | Kshitibhushan Singh Pandaw |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Introduction:
This study presents a comparative analysis of crestal bone levels, keratinized gingiva width (KGW), and gingival thickness (BGT) between basal and conventional dental implants over a 6-month period in the mandibular posterior region.
Materials and Methods:
A total of 20 patients were divided into two groups: Group A (basal implants) and Group B (conventional implants). Both groups underwent flapless implant placements, with immediate loading for basal implants and delayed loading for conventional implants.
Results:
The results demonstrated significant differences in crestal bone levels, KGW, and BGT between the two groups. The basal implant group exhibited greater mean changes in crestal bone levels (0.35 mm), KGW (0.27 mm), and BGT (0.30 mm) compared to the conventional implant group. These findings suggest a potentially higher risk of bone loss and soft tissue alterations with basal implants, likely due to the biomechanical stresses associated with immediate loading.
Conclusion:
The study concludes that while basal implants offer the advantage of immediate loading, they may also present challenges related to bone and soft tissue stability. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-46f03ec6f689457fb6d9a069ede297ec |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 0976-4879 0975-7406 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
spelling | doaj-art-46f03ec6f689457fb6d9a069ede297ec2025-01-13T10:12:38ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0976-48790975-74062024-12-0116Suppl 4S3655S365710.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1164_24Comparative Analysis of Crestal Bone Levels of Basal Implants and Conventional Implants: A Clinico Radiological StudyKshitibhushan Singh PandawSachin K MalagiDennis V AbrahamSaurabh TembhurneSneha BanerjeeArundhuti MahatoIntroduction: This study presents a comparative analysis of crestal bone levels, keratinized gingiva width (KGW), and gingival thickness (BGT) between basal and conventional dental implants over a 6-month period in the mandibular posterior region. Materials and Methods: A total of 20 patients were divided into two groups: Group A (basal implants) and Group B (conventional implants). Both groups underwent flapless implant placements, with immediate loading for basal implants and delayed loading for conventional implants. Results: The results demonstrated significant differences in crestal bone levels, KGW, and BGT between the two groups. The basal implant group exhibited greater mean changes in crestal bone levels (0.35 mm), KGW (0.27 mm), and BGT (0.30 mm) compared to the conventional implant group. These findings suggest a potentially higher risk of bone loss and soft tissue alterations with basal implants, likely due to the biomechanical stresses associated with immediate loading. Conclusion: The study concludes that while basal implants offer the advantage of immediate loading, they may also present challenges related to bone and soft tissue stability.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1164_24basal dental implantscrestal bone levelsgingival thicknesskeratinized gingiva width |
spellingShingle | Kshitibhushan Singh Pandaw Sachin K Malagi Dennis V Abraham Saurabh Tembhurne Sneha Banerjee Arundhuti Mahato Comparative Analysis of Crestal Bone Levels of Basal Implants and Conventional Implants: A Clinico Radiological Study Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences basal dental implants crestal bone levels gingival thickness keratinized gingiva width |
title | Comparative Analysis of Crestal Bone Levels of Basal Implants and Conventional Implants: A Clinico Radiological Study |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of Crestal Bone Levels of Basal Implants and Conventional Implants: A Clinico Radiological Study |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Crestal Bone Levels of Basal Implants and Conventional Implants: A Clinico Radiological Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Crestal Bone Levels of Basal Implants and Conventional Implants: A Clinico Radiological Study |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of Crestal Bone Levels of Basal Implants and Conventional Implants: A Clinico Radiological Study |
title_sort | comparative analysis of crestal bone levels of basal implants and conventional implants a clinico radiological study |
topic | basal dental implants crestal bone levels gingival thickness keratinized gingiva width |
url | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1164_24 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kshitibhushansinghpandaw comparativeanalysisofcrestalbonelevelsofbasalimplantsandconventionalimplantsaclinicoradiologicalstudy AT sachinkmalagi comparativeanalysisofcrestalbonelevelsofbasalimplantsandconventionalimplantsaclinicoradiologicalstudy AT dennisvabraham comparativeanalysisofcrestalbonelevelsofbasalimplantsandconventionalimplantsaclinicoradiologicalstudy AT saurabhtembhurne comparativeanalysisofcrestalbonelevelsofbasalimplantsandconventionalimplantsaclinicoradiologicalstudy AT snehabanerjee comparativeanalysisofcrestalbonelevelsofbasalimplantsandconventionalimplantsaclinicoradiologicalstudy AT arundhutimahato comparativeanalysisofcrestalbonelevelsofbasalimplantsandconventionalimplantsaclinicoradiologicalstudy |