Empirical Models of foF2 and hmF2 Reconstituted by Global Ionosonde and Reanalysis Data and COSMIC Observations

Abstract The F2‐peak plasma frequency (foF2) and the height of the F2 peak (hmF2) are two of the most important parameters for any ionospheric model, as well as radio propagation studies and applications. In this study, we have developed empirical models to capture the most significant variations of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fuqing Huang, Haibing Ruan, Jiuhou Lei, Jiahao Zhong, Xinan Yue, Guozhu Li, Yiding Chen, Jianhui He, Na Li, Xiaoli Luan, Chao Xiong, Xiankang Dou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-04-01
Series:Space Weather
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003848
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841536396796362752
author Fuqing Huang
Haibing Ruan
Jiuhou Lei
Jiahao Zhong
Xinan Yue
Guozhu Li
Yiding Chen
Jianhui He
Na Li
Xiaoli Luan
Chao Xiong
Xiankang Dou
author_facet Fuqing Huang
Haibing Ruan
Jiuhou Lei
Jiahao Zhong
Xinan Yue
Guozhu Li
Yiding Chen
Jianhui He
Na Li
Xiaoli Luan
Chao Xiong
Xiankang Dou
author_sort Fuqing Huang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The F2‐peak plasma frequency (foF2) and the height of the F2 peak (hmF2) are two of the most important parameters for any ionospheric model, as well as radio propagation studies and applications. In this study, we have developed empirical models to capture the most significant variations of foF2 and hmF2. The derived empirical models (referred to as the USTC models within this study) are specified through global ionosonde and reanalysis data based on the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) Consultative Committee on International Radio (CCIR) method and Constellation Observindg System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC) observations based on the empirical orthogonal function analysis, respectively. The USTC models are validated against the IRI CCIR model prediction. The comparison results revealed that the empirical foF2 model performs better in capturing the foF2 variations than the IRI CCIR model, which can overcome the underestimation of the IRI CCIR model at low latitudes. Although the IRI CCIR model overestimation at middle latitudes is addressed by the empirical hmF2 model, the visible differences between the model predictions and ionosonde observations still exist at low latitudes, which could be attributed to the significant difference between COSMIC and ionosonde hmF2 measures.
format Article
id doaj-art-3dc05a8ff6484ed7bef17c2e147ce4d8
institution Kabale University
issn 1542-7390
language English
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Space Weather
spelling doaj-art-3dc05a8ff6484ed7bef17c2e147ce4d82025-01-14T16:27:28ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902024-04-01224n/an/a10.1029/2023SW003848Empirical Models of foF2 and hmF2 Reconstituted by Global Ionosonde and Reanalysis Data and COSMIC ObservationsFuqing Huang0Haibing Ruan1Jiuhou Lei2Jiahao Zhong3Xinan Yue4Guozhu Li5Yiding Chen6Jianhui He7Na Li8Xiaoli Luan9Chao Xiong10Xiankang Dou11Deep Space Exploration Laboratory/School of Earth and Space Sciences University of Science and Technology of China Hefei ChinaInstitute of Space Weather Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology Nanjing ChinaDeep Space Exploration Laboratory/School of Earth and Space Sciences University of Science and Technology of China Hefei ChinaPlanetary Environmental and Astrobiological Research Laboratory (PEARL) School of Atmospheric Sciences Sun Yat‐sen University Zhuhai ChinaKey Laboratory of Earth and Planetary Physics Institute of Geology and Geophysics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing ChinaKey Laboratory of Earth and Planetary Physics Institute of Geology and Geophysics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing ChinaKey Laboratory of Earth and Planetary Physics Institute of Geology and Geophysics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing ChinaKey Laboratory of Earth and Planetary Physics Institute of Geology and Geophysics Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing ChinaNational Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Environment China Research Institute of Radio‐wave Propagation Qingdao ChinaDeep Space Exploration Laboratory/School of Earth and Space Sciences University of Science and Technology of China Hefei ChinaDepartment of Space Physics College of Electronic Information Wuhan University Wuhan ChinaDeep Space Exploration Laboratory/School of Earth and Space Sciences University of Science and Technology of China Hefei ChinaAbstract The F2‐peak plasma frequency (foF2) and the height of the F2 peak (hmF2) are two of the most important parameters for any ionospheric model, as well as radio propagation studies and applications. In this study, we have developed empirical models to capture the most significant variations of foF2 and hmF2. The derived empirical models (referred to as the USTC models within this study) are specified through global ionosonde and reanalysis data based on the International Reference Ionosphere (IRI) Consultative Committee on International Radio (CCIR) method and Constellation Observindg System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC) observations based on the empirical orthogonal function analysis, respectively. The USTC models are validated against the IRI CCIR model prediction. The comparison results revealed that the empirical foF2 model performs better in capturing the foF2 variations than the IRI CCIR model, which can overcome the underestimation of the IRI CCIR model at low latitudes. Although the IRI CCIR model overestimation at middle latitudes is addressed by the empirical hmF2 model, the visible differences between the model predictions and ionosonde observations still exist at low latitudes, which could be attributed to the significant difference between COSMIC and ionosonde hmF2 measures.https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003848
spellingShingle Fuqing Huang
Haibing Ruan
Jiuhou Lei
Jiahao Zhong
Xinan Yue
Guozhu Li
Yiding Chen
Jianhui He
Na Li
Xiaoli Luan
Chao Xiong
Xiankang Dou
Empirical Models of foF2 and hmF2 Reconstituted by Global Ionosonde and Reanalysis Data and COSMIC Observations
Space Weather
title Empirical Models of foF2 and hmF2 Reconstituted by Global Ionosonde and Reanalysis Data and COSMIC Observations
title_full Empirical Models of foF2 and hmF2 Reconstituted by Global Ionosonde and Reanalysis Data and COSMIC Observations
title_fullStr Empirical Models of foF2 and hmF2 Reconstituted by Global Ionosonde and Reanalysis Data and COSMIC Observations
title_full_unstemmed Empirical Models of foF2 and hmF2 Reconstituted by Global Ionosonde and Reanalysis Data and COSMIC Observations
title_short Empirical Models of foF2 and hmF2 Reconstituted by Global Ionosonde and Reanalysis Data and COSMIC Observations
title_sort empirical models of fof2 and hmf2 reconstituted by global ionosonde and reanalysis data and cosmic observations
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2023SW003848
work_keys_str_mv AT fuqinghuang empiricalmodelsoffof2andhmf2reconstitutedbyglobalionosondeandreanalysisdataandcosmicobservations
AT haibingruan empiricalmodelsoffof2andhmf2reconstitutedbyglobalionosondeandreanalysisdataandcosmicobservations
AT jiuhoulei empiricalmodelsoffof2andhmf2reconstitutedbyglobalionosondeandreanalysisdataandcosmicobservations
AT jiahaozhong empiricalmodelsoffof2andhmf2reconstitutedbyglobalionosondeandreanalysisdataandcosmicobservations
AT xinanyue empiricalmodelsoffof2andhmf2reconstitutedbyglobalionosondeandreanalysisdataandcosmicobservations
AT guozhuli empiricalmodelsoffof2andhmf2reconstitutedbyglobalionosondeandreanalysisdataandcosmicobservations
AT yidingchen empiricalmodelsoffof2andhmf2reconstitutedbyglobalionosondeandreanalysisdataandcosmicobservations
AT jianhuihe empiricalmodelsoffof2andhmf2reconstitutedbyglobalionosondeandreanalysisdataandcosmicobservations
AT nali empiricalmodelsoffof2andhmf2reconstitutedbyglobalionosondeandreanalysisdataandcosmicobservations
AT xiaoliluan empiricalmodelsoffof2andhmf2reconstitutedbyglobalionosondeandreanalysisdataandcosmicobservations
AT chaoxiong empiricalmodelsoffof2andhmf2reconstitutedbyglobalionosondeandreanalysisdataandcosmicobservations
AT xiankangdou empiricalmodelsoffof2andhmf2reconstitutedbyglobalionosondeandreanalysisdataandcosmicobservations