Comparative Accuracy of Automated Upper Arm and Wrist Blood Pressure Devices: A Comparison with Intra-arterial line

Background: Accurate measurement of blood pressure is crucial for the diagnosis and treatment of the cardiovascular system diseases. Automatic non-invasive blood pressure devices are now widely for the measurement of blood pressure patients at home and even by the doctors in emergency room in Iraq...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ahmed Abdulwahid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Faculty of Medicine, University of Kufa 2025-06-01
Series:مجلة الكوفة الطبية
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.uokufa.edu.iq/index.php/kmj/article/view/18997
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849320866001715200
author Ahmed Abdulwahid
author_facet Ahmed Abdulwahid
author_sort Ahmed Abdulwahid
collection DOAJ
description Background: Accurate measurement of blood pressure is crucial for the diagnosis and treatment of the cardiovascular system diseases. Automatic non-invasive blood pressure devices are now widely for the measurement of blood pressure patients at home and even by the doctors in emergency room in Iraq due to their ease of use. However, the accuracy of these devices had been a matter of debate. Aim of the study: Our study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the automated wrist and upper arm devices in blood pressure measurement. Methods: The study was a cross sectional study involved 75 patients who were undergoing cardiac catheterization. Blood pressure was measured using two types of automated devices, Rossmax upper arm and wrist devices. Their readings were compared simultaneously with the readings of an intra-arterial catheter to assess their accuracy. Results: The automated upper arm and wrist devices measured a higher value of systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures than those measured by intra-arterial catheter with mean of differences of 6.11 mmHg, 6.79 mmHg and 6.57 mmHg respectively, regarding the upper arm device. The mean of differences of the readings of systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressures measured by wrist device were 11.32 mmHg, 18.30 mmHg and 15.98 mmHg, respectively. Both devices exhibited good reproducibility. Conclusion: Rossmax upper arm and wrist devices overestimate blood pressure. They are inaccurate and should not be relied upon for critically ill patients and in the emergency room.
format Article
id doaj-art-36855e3cb20a46e2bc2fcd8d0a7a6daa
institution Kabale University
issn 1993-517X
2709-4464
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher Faculty of Medicine, University of Kufa
record_format Article
series مجلة الكوفة الطبية
spelling doaj-art-36855e3cb20a46e2bc2fcd8d0a7a6daa2025-08-20T03:49:56ZengFaculty of Medicine, University of Kufaمجلة الكوفة الطبية1993-517X2709-44642025-06-0121110.36330/kmj.v21.i1.18997Comparative Accuracy of Automated Upper Arm and Wrist Blood Pressure Devices: A Comparison with Intra-arterial lineAhmed Abdulwahid0Al-Zahraa College of Medicine, University of Basrah, Iraq. Background: Accurate measurement of blood pressure is crucial for the diagnosis and treatment of the cardiovascular system diseases. Automatic non-invasive blood pressure devices are now widely for the measurement of blood pressure patients at home and even by the doctors in emergency room in Iraq due to their ease of use. However, the accuracy of these devices had been a matter of debate. Aim of the study: Our study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the automated wrist and upper arm devices in blood pressure measurement. Methods: The study was a cross sectional study involved 75 patients who were undergoing cardiac catheterization. Blood pressure was measured using two types of automated devices, Rossmax upper arm and wrist devices. Their readings were compared simultaneously with the readings of an intra-arterial catheter to assess their accuracy. Results: The automated upper arm and wrist devices measured a higher value of systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures than those measured by intra-arterial catheter with mean of differences of 6.11 mmHg, 6.79 mmHg and 6.57 mmHg respectively, regarding the upper arm device. The mean of differences of the readings of systolic, diastolic and mean arterial blood pressures measured by wrist device were 11.32 mmHg, 18.30 mmHg and 15.98 mmHg, respectively. Both devices exhibited good reproducibility. Conclusion: Rossmax upper arm and wrist devices overestimate blood pressure. They are inaccurate and should not be relied upon for critically ill patients and in the emergency room. https://journal.uokufa.edu.iq/index.php/kmj/article/view/18997Blood pressureRossmax automated blood pressure devicesupper armwrist
spellingShingle Ahmed Abdulwahid
Comparative Accuracy of Automated Upper Arm and Wrist Blood Pressure Devices: A Comparison with Intra-arterial line
مجلة الكوفة الطبية
Blood pressure
Rossmax
automated blood pressure devices
upper arm
wrist
title Comparative Accuracy of Automated Upper Arm and Wrist Blood Pressure Devices: A Comparison with Intra-arterial line
title_full Comparative Accuracy of Automated Upper Arm and Wrist Blood Pressure Devices: A Comparison with Intra-arterial line
title_fullStr Comparative Accuracy of Automated Upper Arm and Wrist Blood Pressure Devices: A Comparison with Intra-arterial line
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Accuracy of Automated Upper Arm and Wrist Blood Pressure Devices: A Comparison with Intra-arterial line
title_short Comparative Accuracy of Automated Upper Arm and Wrist Blood Pressure Devices: A Comparison with Intra-arterial line
title_sort comparative accuracy of automated upper arm and wrist blood pressure devices a comparison with intra arterial line
topic Blood pressure
Rossmax
automated blood pressure devices
upper arm
wrist
url https://journal.uokufa.edu.iq/index.php/kmj/article/view/18997
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedabdulwahid comparativeaccuracyofautomatedupperarmandwristbloodpressuredevicesacomparisonwithintraarterialline