Differences of simulated ankle dorsiflexion limitation on lower extremity biomechanics during long jump takeoff

The long jump is an athletic event that demands speed, power, force application, and balance, with each phase being critical to overall performance. However, previous research has neglected the limiting effect of the wedge pedals on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. This cross-sectional study inve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zanni Zhang, Datao Xu, Xiangli Gao, Huiyu Zhou, Julien S. Baker, Zsolt Radak, Yaodong Gu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:Heliyon
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024170405
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841526184350842880
author Zanni Zhang
Datao Xu
Xiangli Gao
Huiyu Zhou
Julien S. Baker
Zsolt Radak
Yaodong Gu
author_facet Zanni Zhang
Datao Xu
Xiangli Gao
Huiyu Zhou
Julien S. Baker
Zsolt Radak
Yaodong Gu
author_sort Zanni Zhang
collection DOAJ
description The long jump is an athletic event that demands speed, power, force application, and balance, with each phase being critical to overall performance. However, previous research has neglected the limiting effect of the wedge pedals on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. This cross-sectional study investigated biomechanical changes in the lower extremities during long jumps under varying degrees of ankle dorsiflexion. Thirty male Division II long jump athletes executed jumps under three conditions: no dorsiflexion, with 10° dorsiflexion restriction, and with 20° dorsiflexion restriction. A Vicon motion capture system with eight cameras and an AMTI force platform were used to collect biomechanical data simultaneously during the long jump. The angles, moments, and velocities of the ankle, hip, and knee joints during takeoff were simulated and calculated using a musculoskeletal model. Between-group variations were assessed using one-way repeated measures ANOVA, with statistical parametric mapping (SPM1D) applied for analysis. Results showed that as ankle restriction increased, vertical velocity gain increased: NW (3.34 ± 0.21 m/s), 10W (3.65 ± 0.14 m/s), and 20W (3.77 ± 0.12 m/s) (p < 0.001). Horizontal velocity loss was significantly higher only at 20W (p = 0.002). Peak extension angle, angular velocity, and power were highest at 10W for the knee and hip joints (p < 0.05). Joint forces at the ankle, knee, and hip were significantly affected by different pedal angles (p < 0.001). Athletes with a 10° ankle dorsiflexion limit showed increased vertical velocity with minimal horizontal velocity loss, potentially enhancing performance. This limit also increased muscle co-activation around the knee, possibly stabilizing it. Athletes should consider a 10° ankle dorsiflexion limit in training to improve performance and reduce injury risk.
format Article
id doaj-art-30ff30e889db4d06a89c09b9c463c696
institution Kabale University
issn 2405-8440
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Heliyon
spelling doaj-art-30ff30e889db4d06a89c09b9c463c6962025-01-17T04:49:59ZengElsevierHeliyon2405-84402025-01-01111e41009Differences of simulated ankle dorsiflexion limitation on lower extremity biomechanics during long jump takeoffZanni Zhang0Datao Xu1Xiangli Gao2Huiyu Zhou3Julien S. Baker4Zsolt Radak5Yaodong Gu6Faculty of Sport Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, ChinaFaculty of Sport Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China; Faculty of Engineering, University of Pannonia, Veszprem, 8201, HungaryFaculty of Sport Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, ChinaFaculty of Sport Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, ChinaFaculty of Sport Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China; Centre for Population Health and Medical Informatics, Hong Kong Baptist University, Kowloon, ChinaFaculty of Sport Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China; Research Institute of Sport Science, University of Physical Education, Budapest, 1123, HungaryFaculty of Sport Science, Ningbo University, Ningbo, 315211, China; Corresponding author.The long jump is an athletic event that demands speed, power, force application, and balance, with each phase being critical to overall performance. However, previous research has neglected the limiting effect of the wedge pedals on ankle dorsiflexion range of motion. This cross-sectional study investigated biomechanical changes in the lower extremities during long jumps under varying degrees of ankle dorsiflexion. Thirty male Division II long jump athletes executed jumps under three conditions: no dorsiflexion, with 10° dorsiflexion restriction, and with 20° dorsiflexion restriction. A Vicon motion capture system with eight cameras and an AMTI force platform were used to collect biomechanical data simultaneously during the long jump. The angles, moments, and velocities of the ankle, hip, and knee joints during takeoff were simulated and calculated using a musculoskeletal model. Between-group variations were assessed using one-way repeated measures ANOVA, with statistical parametric mapping (SPM1D) applied for analysis. Results showed that as ankle restriction increased, vertical velocity gain increased: NW (3.34 ± 0.21 m/s), 10W (3.65 ± 0.14 m/s), and 20W (3.77 ± 0.12 m/s) (p < 0.001). Horizontal velocity loss was significantly higher only at 20W (p = 0.002). Peak extension angle, angular velocity, and power were highest at 10W for the knee and hip joints (p < 0.05). Joint forces at the ankle, knee, and hip were significantly affected by different pedal angles (p < 0.001). Athletes with a 10° ankle dorsiflexion limit showed increased vertical velocity with minimal horizontal velocity loss, potentially enhancing performance. This limit also increased muscle co-activation around the knee, possibly stabilizing it. Athletes should consider a 10° ankle dorsiflexion limit in training to improve performance and reduce injury risk.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024170405AnkleRange of motionLower extremityBiomechanicsJumping
spellingShingle Zanni Zhang
Datao Xu
Xiangli Gao
Huiyu Zhou
Julien S. Baker
Zsolt Radak
Yaodong Gu
Differences of simulated ankle dorsiflexion limitation on lower extremity biomechanics during long jump takeoff
Heliyon
Ankle
Range of motion
Lower extremity
Biomechanics
Jumping
title Differences of simulated ankle dorsiflexion limitation on lower extremity biomechanics during long jump takeoff
title_full Differences of simulated ankle dorsiflexion limitation on lower extremity biomechanics during long jump takeoff
title_fullStr Differences of simulated ankle dorsiflexion limitation on lower extremity biomechanics during long jump takeoff
title_full_unstemmed Differences of simulated ankle dorsiflexion limitation on lower extremity biomechanics during long jump takeoff
title_short Differences of simulated ankle dorsiflexion limitation on lower extremity biomechanics during long jump takeoff
title_sort differences of simulated ankle dorsiflexion limitation on lower extremity biomechanics during long jump takeoff
topic Ankle
Range of motion
Lower extremity
Biomechanics
Jumping
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024170405
work_keys_str_mv AT zannizhang differencesofsimulatedankledorsiflexionlimitationonlowerextremitybiomechanicsduringlongjumptakeoff
AT dataoxu differencesofsimulatedankledorsiflexionlimitationonlowerextremitybiomechanicsduringlongjumptakeoff
AT xiangligao differencesofsimulatedankledorsiflexionlimitationonlowerextremitybiomechanicsduringlongjumptakeoff
AT huiyuzhou differencesofsimulatedankledorsiflexionlimitationonlowerextremitybiomechanicsduringlongjumptakeoff
AT juliensbaker differencesofsimulatedankledorsiflexionlimitationonlowerextremitybiomechanicsduringlongjumptakeoff
AT zsoltradak differencesofsimulatedankledorsiflexionlimitationonlowerextremitybiomechanicsduringlongjumptakeoff
AT yaodonggu differencesofsimulatedankledorsiflexionlimitationonlowerextremitybiomechanicsduringlongjumptakeoff