Frequent Phraseology as Pointers to Evaluation in Judicial Opinions: A Corpus-Driven Comparative Perspective

Using Sketch Engine to explore two sets of data, a corpus of US Supreme Court opinions and a corpus of opinions from Poland’s Trybunał Konstytucyjny (in literal translation: Constitutional Tribunal), this paper explores the use of evaluative language in the context of judicial justification. Adoptin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lodz University Press 2024-12-01
Series:Research in Language
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/research/article/view/24555
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841560759939629056
author Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski
author_facet Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski
author_sort Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski
collection DOAJ
description Using Sketch Engine to explore two sets of data, a corpus of US Supreme Court opinions and a corpus of opinions from Poland’s Trybunał Konstytucyjny (in literal translation: Constitutional Tribunal), this paper explores the use of evaluative language in the context of judicial justification. Adopting a corpus-driven approach, the analysis has shown that a number of 3-4-grams are found in co-occurrence patterns with value-laden lexis in both the SCOTUS and the Constitutional Tribunal justifications. In semantic terms, these expressions have been found to serve as pointers to evaluation and as clues to the textual segments where argumentation unfolds. The scrutiny of the relevant co-texts has revealed that these phrases tend to be utilized as building blocks of judicial discourse to help frame interpretive and argumentative concerns.
format Article
id doaj-art-25f75d476bf84bac80e33786bf252999
institution Kabale University
issn 1731-7533
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Lodz University Press
record_format Article
series Research in Language
spelling doaj-art-25f75d476bf84bac80e33786bf2529992025-01-03T14:52:55ZengLodz University PressResearch in Language1731-75332024-12-0122212014110.18778/1731-7533.22.2.0325050Frequent Phraseology as Pointers to Evaluation in Judicial Opinions: A Corpus-Driven Comparative PerspectiveStanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski0University of ŁódźUsing Sketch Engine to explore two sets of data, a corpus of US Supreme Court opinions and a corpus of opinions from Poland’s Trybunał Konstytucyjny (in literal translation: Constitutional Tribunal), this paper explores the use of evaluative language in the context of judicial justification. Adopting a corpus-driven approach, the analysis has shown that a number of 3-4-grams are found in co-occurrence patterns with value-laden lexis in both the SCOTUS and the Constitutional Tribunal justifications. In semantic terms, these expressions have been found to serve as pointers to evaluation and as clues to the textual segments where argumentation unfolds. The scrutiny of the relevant co-texts has revealed that these phrases tend to be utilized as building blocks of judicial discourse to help frame interpretive and argumentative concerns.https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/research/article/view/24555evaluationevaluative languagejustificationjudicial opinion
spellingShingle Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski
Frequent Phraseology as Pointers to Evaluation in Judicial Opinions: A Corpus-Driven Comparative Perspective
Research in Language
evaluation
evaluative language
justification
judicial opinion
title Frequent Phraseology as Pointers to Evaluation in Judicial Opinions: A Corpus-Driven Comparative Perspective
title_full Frequent Phraseology as Pointers to Evaluation in Judicial Opinions: A Corpus-Driven Comparative Perspective
title_fullStr Frequent Phraseology as Pointers to Evaluation in Judicial Opinions: A Corpus-Driven Comparative Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Frequent Phraseology as Pointers to Evaluation in Judicial Opinions: A Corpus-Driven Comparative Perspective
title_short Frequent Phraseology as Pointers to Evaluation in Judicial Opinions: A Corpus-Driven Comparative Perspective
title_sort frequent phraseology as pointers to evaluation in judicial opinions a corpus driven comparative perspective
topic evaluation
evaluative language
justification
judicial opinion
url https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/research/article/view/24555
work_keys_str_mv AT stanisławgozdzroszkowski frequentphraseologyaspointerstoevaluationinjudicialopinionsacorpusdrivencomparativeperspective