Frequent Phraseology as Pointers to Evaluation in Judicial Opinions: A Corpus-Driven Comparative Perspective
Using Sketch Engine to explore two sets of data, a corpus of US Supreme Court opinions and a corpus of opinions from Poland’s Trybunał Konstytucyjny (in literal translation: Constitutional Tribunal), this paper explores the use of evaluative language in the context of judicial justification. Adoptin...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Lodz University Press
2024-12-01
|
Series: | Research in Language |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/research/article/view/24555 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841560759939629056 |
---|---|
author | Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski |
author_facet | Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski |
author_sort | Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Using Sketch Engine to explore two sets of data, a corpus of US Supreme Court opinions and a corpus of opinions from Poland’s Trybunał Konstytucyjny (in literal translation: Constitutional Tribunal), this paper explores the use of evaluative language in the context of judicial justification. Adopting a corpus-driven approach, the analysis has shown that a number of 3-4-grams are found in co-occurrence patterns with value-laden lexis in both the SCOTUS and the Constitutional Tribunal justifications. In semantic terms, these expressions have been found to serve as pointers to evaluation and as clues to the textual segments where argumentation unfolds. The scrutiny of the relevant co-texts has revealed that these phrases tend to be utilized as building blocks of judicial discourse to help frame interpretive and argumentative concerns. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-25f75d476bf84bac80e33786bf252999 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1731-7533 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
publisher | Lodz University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Research in Language |
spelling | doaj-art-25f75d476bf84bac80e33786bf2529992025-01-03T14:52:55ZengLodz University PressResearch in Language1731-75332024-12-0122212014110.18778/1731-7533.22.2.0325050Frequent Phraseology as Pointers to Evaluation in Judicial Opinions: A Corpus-Driven Comparative PerspectiveStanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski0University of ŁódźUsing Sketch Engine to explore two sets of data, a corpus of US Supreme Court opinions and a corpus of opinions from Poland’s Trybunał Konstytucyjny (in literal translation: Constitutional Tribunal), this paper explores the use of evaluative language in the context of judicial justification. Adopting a corpus-driven approach, the analysis has shown that a number of 3-4-grams are found in co-occurrence patterns with value-laden lexis in both the SCOTUS and the Constitutional Tribunal justifications. In semantic terms, these expressions have been found to serve as pointers to evaluation and as clues to the textual segments where argumentation unfolds. The scrutiny of the relevant co-texts has revealed that these phrases tend to be utilized as building blocks of judicial discourse to help frame interpretive and argumentative concerns.https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/research/article/view/24555evaluationevaluative languagejustificationjudicial opinion |
spellingShingle | Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski Frequent Phraseology as Pointers to Evaluation in Judicial Opinions: A Corpus-Driven Comparative Perspective Research in Language evaluation evaluative language justification judicial opinion |
title | Frequent Phraseology as Pointers to Evaluation in Judicial Opinions: A Corpus-Driven Comparative Perspective |
title_full | Frequent Phraseology as Pointers to Evaluation in Judicial Opinions: A Corpus-Driven Comparative Perspective |
title_fullStr | Frequent Phraseology as Pointers to Evaluation in Judicial Opinions: A Corpus-Driven Comparative Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Frequent Phraseology as Pointers to Evaluation in Judicial Opinions: A Corpus-Driven Comparative Perspective |
title_short | Frequent Phraseology as Pointers to Evaluation in Judicial Opinions: A Corpus-Driven Comparative Perspective |
title_sort | frequent phraseology as pointers to evaluation in judicial opinions a corpus driven comparative perspective |
topic | evaluation evaluative language justification judicial opinion |
url | https://czasopisma.uni.lodz.pl/research/article/view/24555 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stanisławgozdzroszkowski frequentphraseologyaspointerstoevaluationinjudicialopinionsacorpusdrivencomparativeperspective |