Examining COVID-19 Sources of Information, Vaccine Hesitancy, and Uptake Behaviors Among Diverse Underserved Latinx Communities: A Convergent Parallel Mixed Methods Approach

At 63.7 million, Latinxs constitute the largest racial/ethnic minority in the United States (US). Early during the COVID-19 pandemic, Latinxs were disproportionately impacted and exhibited lower vaccine uptake. Widespread infodemics contributed to confusion, eroded trust, and fostered vaccine hesita...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gira J. Ravelo, Weize Wang, Alvonee Penn, Tara G. Bautista, Mariana Sanchez, Elena Bastida, Olveen Carrasquillo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-12-01
Series:COVID
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-8112/4/12/136
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:At 63.7 million, Latinxs constitute the largest racial/ethnic minority in the United States (US). Early during the COVID-19 pandemic, Latinxs were disproportionately impacted and exhibited lower vaccine uptake. Widespread infodemics contributed to confusion, eroded trust, and fostered vaccine hesitancy among this population. This study used a convergent parallel mixed-methods approach to analyze, integrate, and interpret concurrently collected data gathered as part of the Community Engaged Alliance (CEAL) Against COVID-19 Disparities project, initiated by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. Target populations were three underserved Latinx communities of Miami-Dade County (MDC), Florida, during the pandemic’s peak. Qualitative findings show six themes and subthemes that integrate with quantitative survey data (N = 451). Themes included a “wait-and-see” approach to vaccine uptake; concerns about infodemics; attitudes about science, education, healthcare providers; and personal sources of information. Our findings highlight cultural significance, trusted sources, and reasons for hesitancy before vaccination decisions as corroborated by quantitative results. However, divergence was found regarding media sources. Consistent with the literature, although participants report concerns about infodemics and media bias, they still rely on media for updates, particularly with established television networks and trusted personalities. The value placed on education throughout the study (quantitative and qualitative) highlights the importance of culturally appropriate educational interventions. Moreover, the complex nature of the impact that media has on health-related information and vaccine uptake in this population underscores the need for media literacy interventions alongside health education.
ISSN:2673-8112