Sonographic measurement of inferior vena cava diameter in assessment of volume status in pediatric shock: A prospective observational study.

Background Accurate assessment of intravascular volume status in pediatric shock remains a clinical challenge, often relying on subjective and invasive methods. Bedside ultrasonography of the inferior vena cava (IVC) has emerged as a promising, non-invasive modality to estimate volume status. This...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dr. Vidhyadhar V, Dr. Sowmya N, Dr. Manu Srinivas H, Dr.Muralidhar G, Basavaraja G V
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Student's Journal of Health Research 2025-06-01
Series:Student's Journal of Health Research Africa
Subjects:
Online Access:https://sjhresearchafrica.org/index.php/public-html/article/view/1849/1530
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background Accurate assessment of intravascular volume status in pediatric shock remains a clinical challenge, often relying on subjective and invasive methods. Bedside ultrasonography of the inferior vena cava (IVC) has emerged as a promising, non-invasive modality to estimate volume status. This study aimed to evaluate the IVC diameter and IVC-to-aortic (IVC/Ao) ratio as objective indicators of hypovolemia in children using ultrasound. Objectives: To obtain and analyze data on IVC diameter and IVC/Ao ratio measured by sonography for assessing intravascular volume status in infants and children with clinical shock compared to euvolemic controls. Methods In this prospective observational study, 60 children aged 1 month to 18 years admitted with clinical shock were compared with 60 age-matched euvolemic controls. Sociodemographic characteristics, including age and sex, were recorded. Maximum sagittal IVC diameter, transverse aortic diameter, and IVC/Ao ratio were measured using bedside ultrasound. Results The mean age of participants was comparable; the male-to-female ratio was 0.6:1 in the shock group and 1:1.2 in controls. The mean IVC diameter was significantly lower in the shock group (0.99±0.45 cm) than in controls (1.46±0.52 cm; p<0.001), indicating intravascular hypovolemia. The IVC/Ao ratio was also reduced in shock cases (0.65±0.10) compared to controls (0.98±0.09; p<0.001). No significant difference was observed in aortic diameters. Conclusion Ultrasound-derived measurements of IVC diameter and IVC/Ao ratio are reliable non-invasive indicators of hypovolemia in pediatric shock. Recommendations Bedside ultrasound should be integrated into the routine evaluation of children with suspected shock to improve early detection and guide fluid management.
ISSN:2709-9997