Thou Shalt Not! – How the institutional afterlife of research misconduct scandals shapes research integrity training

Scandals involving cases of research misconduct are often considered to be main drivers for policy initiatives and institutional changes to foster research integrity. These impacts of scandals are usually witnessed during scandals’ peak visibility. In this article we change this perspective by exami...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Serge P.J.M. Horbach, Rachel Fishberg, Sven Ulpts, Lise Degn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Responsible Innovation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23299460.2024.2414500
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841556073622798336
author Serge P.J.M. Horbach
Rachel Fishberg
Sven Ulpts
Lise Degn
author_facet Serge P.J.M. Horbach
Rachel Fishberg
Sven Ulpts
Lise Degn
author_sort Serge P.J.M. Horbach
collection DOAJ
description Scandals involving cases of research misconduct are often considered to be main drivers for policy initiatives and institutional changes to foster research integrity. These impacts of scandals are usually witnessed during scandals’ peak visibility. In this article we change this perspective by examining the way in which scandals continue impacting academic institutions long after the initial attention has faded. To do so, we empirically study research integrity courses at multiple Danish universities. We combine data from document analysis, participatory observations and interviews. In addition, this article makes a conceptual contribution by introducing the notion of the ‘institutional afterlife’ of a scandal. We use this notion to demonstrate how scandals can affect academic communities and practices long after their initial visibility has faded, by re-entering communities and institutions. We thereby contribute a novel approach to studying scandals and their wider implications in academia.
format Article
id doaj-art-1d21524610354c37b640d8b4769d28b1
institution Kabale University
issn 2329-9460
2329-9037
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Responsible Innovation
spelling doaj-art-1d21524610354c37b640d8b4769d28b12025-01-07T13:48:20ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Responsible Innovation2329-94602329-90372024-12-0111110.1080/23299460.2024.2414500Thou Shalt Not! – How the institutional afterlife of research misconduct scandals shapes research integrity trainingSerge P.J.M. Horbach0Rachel Fishberg1Sven Ulpts2Lise Degn3Institute for Science in Society, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, NetherlandsDanish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Department of Political Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkDanish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Department of Political Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkDanish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Department of Political Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, DenmarkScandals involving cases of research misconduct are often considered to be main drivers for policy initiatives and institutional changes to foster research integrity. These impacts of scandals are usually witnessed during scandals’ peak visibility. In this article we change this perspective by examining the way in which scandals continue impacting academic institutions long after the initial attention has faded. To do so, we empirically study research integrity courses at multiple Danish universities. We combine data from document analysis, participatory observations and interviews. In addition, this article makes a conceptual contribution by introducing the notion of the ‘institutional afterlife’ of a scandal. We use this notion to demonstrate how scandals can affect academic communities and practices long after their initial visibility has faded, by re-entering communities and institutions. We thereby contribute a novel approach to studying scandals and their wider implications in academia.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23299460.2024.2414500research integrityresponsible conduct of researchinstitutional responsesPhD trainingresearch misconduct scandals
spellingShingle Serge P.J.M. Horbach
Rachel Fishberg
Sven Ulpts
Lise Degn
Thou Shalt Not! – How the institutional afterlife of research misconduct scandals shapes research integrity training
Journal of Responsible Innovation
research integrity
responsible conduct of research
institutional responses
PhD training
research misconduct scandals
title Thou Shalt Not! – How the institutional afterlife of research misconduct scandals shapes research integrity training
title_full Thou Shalt Not! – How the institutional afterlife of research misconduct scandals shapes research integrity training
title_fullStr Thou Shalt Not! – How the institutional afterlife of research misconduct scandals shapes research integrity training
title_full_unstemmed Thou Shalt Not! – How the institutional afterlife of research misconduct scandals shapes research integrity training
title_short Thou Shalt Not! – How the institutional afterlife of research misconduct scandals shapes research integrity training
title_sort thou shalt not how the institutional afterlife of research misconduct scandals shapes research integrity training
topic research integrity
responsible conduct of research
institutional responses
PhD training
research misconduct scandals
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23299460.2024.2414500
work_keys_str_mv AT sergepjmhorbach thoushaltnothowtheinstitutionalafterlifeofresearchmisconductscandalsshapesresearchintegritytraining
AT rachelfishberg thoushaltnothowtheinstitutionalafterlifeofresearchmisconductscandalsshapesresearchintegritytraining
AT svenulpts thoushaltnothowtheinstitutionalafterlifeofresearchmisconductscandalsshapesresearchintegritytraining
AT lisedegn thoushaltnothowtheinstitutionalafterlifeofresearchmisconductscandalsshapesresearchintegritytraining