Patent Portfolios and Competition Law: Some Reflections After the Recent RPSA Cases
In the pharmaceutical sector, firms often build patent portfolios in order to better protect their innovations, but also to strategically exploit the cluster to prevent entry by generic competition. In fact, once patent protection on the main invention expires, originator firms adopt a two-tiered s...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Católica Editora
2023-06-01
|
Series: | Market and Competition Law Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/12677 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841561390620344320 |
---|---|
author | Emanuela Arezzo |
author_facet | Emanuela Arezzo |
author_sort | Emanuela Arezzo |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
In the pharmaceutical sector, firms often build patent portfolios in order to better protect their innovations, but also to strategically exploit the cluster to prevent entry by generic competition. In fact, once patent protection on the main invention expires, originator firms adopt a two-tiered strategy, centred on the enforcement of secondary patents composing the portfolios. At first, originators threaten generic companies of patent infringement, in a way to discourage entry by generic companies. Secondly, they push generics to enter a patent settlement (in order to compose the very same infringement proceeding), often paying them to stay out of the market: hence, prolonging their exclusivity time, to the detriment of consumers and society at large. While EU institutions have made clear that the latter behaviour is in plain contrast with competition law provisions prohibiting agreements in restraint of trade, RPSAs are only the tail of a multifaceted conduct which deserves closer scrutiny.
|
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-1a50ef223e9c4d999cf6140c43553010 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2184-0008 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023-06-01 |
publisher | Universidade Católica Editora |
record_format | Article |
series | Market and Competition Law Review |
spelling | doaj-art-1a50ef223e9c4d999cf6140c435530102025-01-03T01:41:37ZengUniversidade Católica EditoraMarket and Competition Law Review2184-00082023-06-017110.34632/mclawreview.2023.12677Patent Portfolios and Competition Law: Some Reflections After the Recent RPSA CasesEmanuela Arezzo0Università degli Studi di Teramo Facoltà di Giurisprudenza In the pharmaceutical sector, firms often build patent portfolios in order to better protect their innovations, but also to strategically exploit the cluster to prevent entry by generic competition. In fact, once patent protection on the main invention expires, originator firms adopt a two-tiered strategy, centred on the enforcement of secondary patents composing the portfolios. At first, originators threaten generic companies of patent infringement, in a way to discourage entry by generic companies. Secondly, they push generics to enter a patent settlement (in order to compose the very same infringement proceeding), often paying them to stay out of the market: hence, prolonging their exclusivity time, to the detriment of consumers and society at large. While EU institutions have made clear that the latter behaviour is in plain contrast with competition law provisions prohibiting agreements in restraint of trade, RPSAs are only the tail of a multifaceted conduct which deserves closer scrutiny. https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/12677competitionpatentpatent portfoliosreverse payment settlement agreementshamvexatious litigation |
spellingShingle | Emanuela Arezzo Patent Portfolios and Competition Law: Some Reflections After the Recent RPSA Cases Market and Competition Law Review competition patent patent portfolios reverse payment settlement agreement sham vexatious litigation |
title | Patent Portfolios and Competition Law: Some Reflections After the Recent RPSA Cases |
title_full | Patent Portfolios and Competition Law: Some Reflections After the Recent RPSA Cases |
title_fullStr | Patent Portfolios and Competition Law: Some Reflections After the Recent RPSA Cases |
title_full_unstemmed | Patent Portfolios and Competition Law: Some Reflections After the Recent RPSA Cases |
title_short | Patent Portfolios and Competition Law: Some Reflections After the Recent RPSA Cases |
title_sort | patent portfolios and competition law some reflections after the recent rpsa cases |
topic | competition patent patent portfolios reverse payment settlement agreement sham vexatious litigation |
url | https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/mclawreview/article/view/12677 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT emanuelaarezzo patentportfoliosandcompetitionlawsomereflectionsaftertherecentrpsacases |