Feline sacroiliac luxation: comparison of fluoroscopy-controlled freehand vs. computer-navigated drilling in the sacrum—a cadaveric study

IntroductionSacroiliac luxation is a common traumatic feline injury, with the small size of the sacral body being a challenge for surgical stabilization. This study compared an innovative computer-guided drilling method with the conventional fluoroscopy-controlled freehand technique. Neuronavigation...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lukas Kleiner, Nicole Wolf, Christina Precht, Kati Haenssgen, Franck Forterre, Pia Düver
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1510253/full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841527877775917056
author Lukas Kleiner
Nicole Wolf
Christina Precht
Kati Haenssgen
Franck Forterre
Pia Düver
author_facet Lukas Kleiner
Nicole Wolf
Christina Precht
Kati Haenssgen
Franck Forterre
Pia Düver
author_sort Lukas Kleiner
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionSacroiliac luxation is a common traumatic feline injury, with the small size of the sacral body being a challenge for surgical stabilization. This study compared an innovative computer-guided drilling method with the conventional fluoroscopy-controlled freehand technique. Neuronavigation, using CT-based planning and real-time tracking, was evaluated against the freehand method for accuracy and time efficiency.Materials and methodsBilateral sacroiliac luxation was induced in 20 feline cadavers. One side of the sacral body was drilled using fluoroscopy, and the other with neuronavigation (Stealth Station S8). A reference frame was affixed to the sacral spinous process for tracking. Ten cats were operated on by an ECVS diplomate and 10 by a resident. Postoperative cone beam CT images were used to assess both techniques, comparing the accuracy of the planned corridor vs. the actual drill hole in the sacrum. A learning curve for both methods was estimated by measuring procedure time.ResultsCT scan assessments showed all 40 drill holes achieved “surgically satisfactory” results. The computer-navigated technique demonstrated an average deviation of 1.9 mm (SD 1.0 mm) at the entry point and 1.6 mm (SD 0.8 mm) at the exit point. The pins of 3/20 reference frames penetrated the vertebral canal, creating a risk for potential clinical complications. The neuronavigation-guided procedures took an average of 23 min and 37 s (SD 8 min 34 s), significantly longer than the freehand technique, which averaged 9 min and 47 s (SD 3 min 26 s). A steep learning curve was observed with neuronavigation.DiscussionThe neuronavigation-guided technique achieved accuracy is comparable to the fluoroscopy-controlled method, is offering real-time feedback and has potential for highly precise surgeries near critical anatomical structures. However, significant attention must be given to the placement of the reference frame, as it is placed blindly and presents a potential risk for errors and complications. Despite its longer duration, the neuronavigation method shows promise for improving precision in complex surgical scenarios.
format Article
id doaj-art-1773b099a7084c58895fcd709764e694
institution Kabale University
issn 2297-1769
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Veterinary Science
spelling doaj-art-1773b099a7084c58895fcd709764e6942025-01-15T06:10:18ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Veterinary Science2297-17692025-01-011110.3389/fvets.2024.15102531510253Feline sacroiliac luxation: comparison of fluoroscopy-controlled freehand vs. computer-navigated drilling in the sacrum—a cadaveric studyLukas Kleiner0Nicole Wolf1Christina Precht2Kati Haenssgen3Franck Forterre4Pia Düver5Divison of Small Animal Surgery, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Tierklinik Marigin, Feusisberg, SwitzerlandDivison of Small Animal Surgery, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandDivison of Clinical Radiology, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandDivison of Veterinary Anatomy, Department of Clinical Research and Veterinary Public Health, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandDivison of Small Animal Surgery, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandDivison of Small Animal Surgery, Department of Clinical Veterinary Medicine, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, SwitzerlandIntroductionSacroiliac luxation is a common traumatic feline injury, with the small size of the sacral body being a challenge for surgical stabilization. This study compared an innovative computer-guided drilling method with the conventional fluoroscopy-controlled freehand technique. Neuronavigation, using CT-based planning and real-time tracking, was evaluated against the freehand method for accuracy and time efficiency.Materials and methodsBilateral sacroiliac luxation was induced in 20 feline cadavers. One side of the sacral body was drilled using fluoroscopy, and the other with neuronavigation (Stealth Station S8). A reference frame was affixed to the sacral spinous process for tracking. Ten cats were operated on by an ECVS diplomate and 10 by a resident. Postoperative cone beam CT images were used to assess both techniques, comparing the accuracy of the planned corridor vs. the actual drill hole in the sacrum. A learning curve for both methods was estimated by measuring procedure time.ResultsCT scan assessments showed all 40 drill holes achieved “surgically satisfactory” results. The computer-navigated technique demonstrated an average deviation of 1.9 mm (SD 1.0 mm) at the entry point and 1.6 mm (SD 0.8 mm) at the exit point. The pins of 3/20 reference frames penetrated the vertebral canal, creating a risk for potential clinical complications. The neuronavigation-guided procedures took an average of 23 min and 37 s (SD 8 min 34 s), significantly longer than the freehand technique, which averaged 9 min and 47 s (SD 3 min 26 s). A steep learning curve was observed with neuronavigation.DiscussionThe neuronavigation-guided technique achieved accuracy is comparable to the fluoroscopy-controlled method, is offering real-time feedback and has potential for highly precise surgeries near critical anatomical structures. However, significant attention must be given to the placement of the reference frame, as it is placed blindly and presents a potential risk for errors and complications. Despite its longer duration, the neuronavigation method shows promise for improving precision in complex surgical scenarios.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1510253/fullneuronavigationstealth station S8computer-navigated surgerysacroiliac luxationcatcadaveric study
spellingShingle Lukas Kleiner
Nicole Wolf
Christina Precht
Kati Haenssgen
Franck Forterre
Pia Düver
Feline sacroiliac luxation: comparison of fluoroscopy-controlled freehand vs. computer-navigated drilling in the sacrum—a cadaveric study
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
neuronavigation
stealth station S8
computer-navigated surgery
sacroiliac luxation
cat
cadaveric study
title Feline sacroiliac luxation: comparison of fluoroscopy-controlled freehand vs. computer-navigated drilling in the sacrum—a cadaveric study
title_full Feline sacroiliac luxation: comparison of fluoroscopy-controlled freehand vs. computer-navigated drilling in the sacrum—a cadaveric study
title_fullStr Feline sacroiliac luxation: comparison of fluoroscopy-controlled freehand vs. computer-navigated drilling in the sacrum—a cadaveric study
title_full_unstemmed Feline sacroiliac luxation: comparison of fluoroscopy-controlled freehand vs. computer-navigated drilling in the sacrum—a cadaveric study
title_short Feline sacroiliac luxation: comparison of fluoroscopy-controlled freehand vs. computer-navigated drilling in the sacrum—a cadaveric study
title_sort feline sacroiliac luxation comparison of fluoroscopy controlled freehand vs computer navigated drilling in the sacrum a cadaveric study
topic neuronavigation
stealth station S8
computer-navigated surgery
sacroiliac luxation
cat
cadaveric study
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2024.1510253/full
work_keys_str_mv AT lukaskleiner felinesacroiliacluxationcomparisonoffluoroscopycontrolledfreehandvscomputernavigateddrillinginthesacrumacadavericstudy
AT nicolewolf felinesacroiliacluxationcomparisonoffluoroscopycontrolledfreehandvscomputernavigateddrillinginthesacrumacadavericstudy
AT christinaprecht felinesacroiliacluxationcomparisonoffluoroscopycontrolledfreehandvscomputernavigateddrillinginthesacrumacadavericstudy
AT katihaenssgen felinesacroiliacluxationcomparisonoffluoroscopycontrolledfreehandvscomputernavigateddrillinginthesacrumacadavericstudy
AT franckforterre felinesacroiliacluxationcomparisonoffluoroscopycontrolledfreehandvscomputernavigateddrillinginthesacrumacadavericstudy
AT piaduver felinesacroiliacluxationcomparisonoffluoroscopycontrolledfreehandvscomputernavigateddrillinginthesacrumacadavericstudy