Short-term outcomes of percutaneous versus subcutaneous fascial flap fixation in cubital tunnel syndrome surgery: A retrospective cohort study

Abstract Objective Percutaneous external suturing has been proposed as an alternative approach to fascial flap fixation during anterior subcutaneous transposition for cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS), with the aim of minimizing deep tissue disruption and reducing postoperative complications. This stud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tianyou Hu, Yujie Bian, Qiankun Wang, Tao Zhou, Hongxiang Zhou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-08-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06200-5
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849226038182150144
author Tianyou Hu
Yujie Bian
Qiankun Wang
Tao Zhou
Hongxiang Zhou
author_facet Tianyou Hu
Yujie Bian
Qiankun Wang
Tao Zhou
Hongxiang Zhou
author_sort Tianyou Hu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective Percutaneous external suturing has been proposed as an alternative approach to fascial flap fixation during anterior subcutaneous transposition for cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS), with the aim of minimizing deep tissue disruption and reducing postoperative complications. This study compared short-term outcomes between percutaneous external fixation and traditional subcutaneous fixation of fascial flaps in CuTS surgery. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 114 patients who underwent anterior ulnar nerve transposition with fascial flap coverage were enrolled between January 2020 and December 2023. Patients were grouped based on the method of fascial flap fixation: subcutaneous (n = 57) or percutaneous (n = 57). Clinical assessments—including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation (PRUNE), and Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Functional Score—along with nerve conduction studies (CMAP, SNCV, MNCV), were performed preoperatively and at 6-month follow-up. Results Compared to the subcutaneous group, the percutaneous group showed significantly greater improvement in VAS scores (VAS: -2.75 vs. -1.99, p < 0.001), PRUNE scores (PRUNE: -23.78 vs. -17.64, p < 0.001), and functional scores (Score: +3.58 vs. + 2.70, p = 0.0004). Increases in SNCV (16.45 m/s vs. 14.51 m/s, p = 0.035) and MNCV (18.55 m/s vs. 12.13 m/s, p < 0.001) were also more pronounced in the percutaneous group. Although CMAP improved in both groups, postoperative CMAP values were slightly higher in the subcutaneous group (6.02 ± 0.85 mV vs. 5.40 ± 0.51 mV, p = 0.002). No infections or wound complications occurred in either group; two reoperations for recurrent compression were required in the subcutaneous group. Conclusion Percutaneous external suturing may represent a safe and promising alternative for fascial flap fixation during CuTS surgery, with potential benefits in early postoperative pain relief, nerve conduction, and functional outcomes. However, longer-term studies are needed to assess durability and potential late complications. Trial registration This study was retrospectively registered with the Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Approval No. PJ2024-12-17).
format Article
id doaj-art-12b077ad9fe74f21a59f6e24369a4a9c
institution Kabale University
issn 1749-799X
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj-art-12b077ad9fe74f21a59f6e24369a4a9c2025-08-24T11:40:29ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2025-08-0120111110.1186/s13018-025-06200-5Short-term outcomes of percutaneous versus subcutaneous fascial flap fixation in cubital tunnel syndrome surgery: A retrospective cohort studyTianyou Hu0Yujie Bian1Qiankun Wang2Tao Zhou3Hongxiang Zhou4The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical UniversityThe First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical UniversityThe First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical UniversityThe First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical UniversityThe First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical UniversityAbstract Objective Percutaneous external suturing has been proposed as an alternative approach to fascial flap fixation during anterior subcutaneous transposition for cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS), with the aim of minimizing deep tissue disruption and reducing postoperative complications. This study compared short-term outcomes between percutaneous external fixation and traditional subcutaneous fixation of fascial flaps in CuTS surgery. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, 114 patients who underwent anterior ulnar nerve transposition with fascial flap coverage were enrolled between January 2020 and December 2023. Patients were grouped based on the method of fascial flap fixation: subcutaneous (n = 57) or percutaneous (n = 57). Clinical assessments—including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Patient-Rated Ulnar Nerve Evaluation (PRUNE), and Cubital Tunnel Syndrome Functional Score—along with nerve conduction studies (CMAP, SNCV, MNCV), were performed preoperatively and at 6-month follow-up. Results Compared to the subcutaneous group, the percutaneous group showed significantly greater improvement in VAS scores (VAS: -2.75 vs. -1.99, p < 0.001), PRUNE scores (PRUNE: -23.78 vs. -17.64, p < 0.001), and functional scores (Score: +3.58 vs. + 2.70, p = 0.0004). Increases in SNCV (16.45 m/s vs. 14.51 m/s, p = 0.035) and MNCV (18.55 m/s vs. 12.13 m/s, p < 0.001) were also more pronounced in the percutaneous group. Although CMAP improved in both groups, postoperative CMAP values were slightly higher in the subcutaneous group (6.02 ± 0.85 mV vs. 5.40 ± 0.51 mV, p = 0.002). No infections or wound complications occurred in either group; two reoperations for recurrent compression were required in the subcutaneous group. Conclusion Percutaneous external suturing may represent a safe and promising alternative for fascial flap fixation during CuTS surgery, with potential benefits in early postoperative pain relief, nerve conduction, and functional outcomes. However, longer-term studies are needed to assess durability and potential late complications. Trial registration This study was retrospectively registered with the Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University (Approval No. PJ2024-12-17).https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06200-5Cubital tunnel syndromeUlnar nerveSurgical proceduresNerve regenerationMinimally invasive surgical procedures
spellingShingle Tianyou Hu
Yujie Bian
Qiankun Wang
Tao Zhou
Hongxiang Zhou
Short-term outcomes of percutaneous versus subcutaneous fascial flap fixation in cubital tunnel syndrome surgery: A retrospective cohort study
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Cubital tunnel syndrome
Ulnar nerve
Surgical procedures
Nerve regeneration
Minimally invasive surgical procedures
title Short-term outcomes of percutaneous versus subcutaneous fascial flap fixation in cubital tunnel syndrome surgery: A retrospective cohort study
title_full Short-term outcomes of percutaneous versus subcutaneous fascial flap fixation in cubital tunnel syndrome surgery: A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Short-term outcomes of percutaneous versus subcutaneous fascial flap fixation in cubital tunnel syndrome surgery: A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Short-term outcomes of percutaneous versus subcutaneous fascial flap fixation in cubital tunnel syndrome surgery: A retrospective cohort study
title_short Short-term outcomes of percutaneous versus subcutaneous fascial flap fixation in cubital tunnel syndrome surgery: A retrospective cohort study
title_sort short term outcomes of percutaneous versus subcutaneous fascial flap fixation in cubital tunnel syndrome surgery a retrospective cohort study
topic Cubital tunnel syndrome
Ulnar nerve
Surgical procedures
Nerve regeneration
Minimally invasive surgical procedures
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-06200-5
work_keys_str_mv AT tianyouhu shorttermoutcomesofpercutaneousversussubcutaneousfascialflapfixationincubitaltunnelsyndromesurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yujiebian shorttermoutcomesofpercutaneousversussubcutaneousfascialflapfixationincubitaltunnelsyndromesurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT qiankunwang shorttermoutcomesofpercutaneousversussubcutaneousfascialflapfixationincubitaltunnelsyndromesurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT taozhou shorttermoutcomesofpercutaneousversussubcutaneousfascialflapfixationincubitaltunnelsyndromesurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT hongxiangzhou shorttermoutcomesofpercutaneousversussubcutaneousfascialflapfixationincubitaltunnelsyndromesurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy