D. M. Ovsianyko-Kulikovsky as an Orthologist: the Cognitive-evolutionary Coverage

The article is devoted to the cognitive-evolutionary coverage of D. M. Ovsianyko-Kulikovsky's beliefs as an orthologist who expressed his orthological convictions regarding the norms of syntactic agreement of adjectives with homogeneous noun phrases. The scholar categorically denied the possibi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sergiy Popov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University 2024-12-01
Series:Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія Філологія. Vìsnik Harkìvsʹkogo nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu ìmenì V.N. Karazìna. Serìâ Fìlologìâ.
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicals.karazin.ua/philology/article/view/24757
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841549904235724800
author Sergiy Popov
author_facet Sergiy Popov
author_sort Sergiy Popov
collection DOAJ
description The article is devoted to the cognitive-evolutionary coverage of D. M. Ovsianyko-Kulikovsky's beliefs as an orthologist who expressed his orthological convictions regarding the norms of syntactic agreement of adjectives with homogeneous noun phrases. The scholar categorically denied the possibility of such agreement in the plural, despite the fact that in the eighteenth century such agreement was already quite common in usage as a logical agreement of the plural adjective with more than one noun. The article proves that, defending the illogical agreement of such adjectives in the singular, the scientist demonstrates a superficial perception of such agreement as necessary only with regard to one, closest postpositive noun in the syntagm. The main provisions of the cognitive-evolutionary theory of language are revealed, the essence of which involves the algorithm "perception → logic of thinking → logic of language" and one of the central concepts of which is the concept of superficiality of perception as an orientation to the closest, most noticeable features of phenomena, the categorization of which is often erroneous. Attention is drawn to the fact that the scientist's arguments against the possibility of the considered plural agreement are characterized by emotionality, unscientific nature and disregard for the opposite beliefs of both journalists of his time and famous linguists - both his predecessors and contemporaries ‒ unjustified for the scientific style. It is emphasized that such a position of D. M. Ovsianyko-Kulikovsky is an argument to taste, i.e. one of the two weakest arguments in the theory of argumentation, which in linguistics can be used only to characterize stylistic phenomena, which the agreement under consideration is not. The article concludes that, denying the possibility of such agreement, D. M. Ovsyanyko-Kulikovsky was a very conservative orthologist who, guided by superficial perception, neglected the linguistic facts of usage, journalists and other linguists. Since he had and still has his followers, whose books are still being reprinted, we can speak of the existence of an anti-language-evolutionary conservative party in Russian-language orthology, which can be recognized as quite natural for Russian society as a whole.
format Article
id doaj-art-11b8c9744f8541b5b4023df00c940b23
institution Kabale University
issn 2227-1864
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University
record_format Article
series Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія Філологія. Vìsnik Harkìvsʹkogo nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu ìmenì V.N. Karazìna. Serìâ Fìlologìâ.
spelling doaj-art-11b8c9744f8541b5b4023df00c940b232025-01-10T11:17:36ZengV. N. Karazin Kharkiv National UniversityВісник Харківського національного університету імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія Філологія. Vìsnik Harkìvsʹkogo nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu ìmenì V.N. Karazìna. Serìâ Fìlologìâ.2227-18642024-12-0195889210.26565/2227-1864-2024-95-1324757D. M. Ovsianyko-Kulikovsky as an Orthologist: the Cognitive-evolutionary CoverageSergiy Popov0V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National UniversityThe article is devoted to the cognitive-evolutionary coverage of D. M. Ovsianyko-Kulikovsky's beliefs as an orthologist who expressed his orthological convictions regarding the norms of syntactic agreement of adjectives with homogeneous noun phrases. The scholar categorically denied the possibility of such agreement in the plural, despite the fact that in the eighteenth century such agreement was already quite common in usage as a logical agreement of the plural adjective with more than one noun. The article proves that, defending the illogical agreement of such adjectives in the singular, the scientist demonstrates a superficial perception of such agreement as necessary only with regard to one, closest postpositive noun in the syntagm. The main provisions of the cognitive-evolutionary theory of language are revealed, the essence of which involves the algorithm "perception → logic of thinking → logic of language" and one of the central concepts of which is the concept of superficiality of perception as an orientation to the closest, most noticeable features of phenomena, the categorization of which is often erroneous. Attention is drawn to the fact that the scientist's arguments against the possibility of the considered plural agreement are characterized by emotionality, unscientific nature and disregard for the opposite beliefs of both journalists of his time and famous linguists - both his predecessors and contemporaries ‒ unjustified for the scientific style. It is emphasized that such a position of D. M. Ovsianyko-Kulikovsky is an argument to taste, i.e. one of the two weakest arguments in the theory of argumentation, which in linguistics can be used only to characterize stylistic phenomena, which the agreement under consideration is not. The article concludes that, denying the possibility of such agreement, D. M. Ovsyanyko-Kulikovsky was a very conservative orthologist who, guided by superficial perception, neglected the linguistic facts of usage, journalists and other linguists. Since he had and still has his followers, whose books are still being reprinted, we can speak of the existence of an anti-language-evolutionary conservative party in Russian-language orthology, which can be recognized as quite natural for Russian society as a whole.https://periodicals.karazin.ua/philology/article/view/24757d. m. ovsyanyko-kulikovskysyntax of the russian languagesyntactic agreementadjectivenouncognitive-evolutionary theory of languagesurface perceptiontheory of argumentation
spellingShingle Sergiy Popov
D. M. Ovsianyko-Kulikovsky as an Orthologist: the Cognitive-evolutionary Coverage
Вісник Харківського національного університету імені В. Н. Каразіна. Серія Філологія. Vìsnik Harkìvsʹkogo nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu ìmenì V.N. Karazìna. Serìâ Fìlologìâ.
d. m. ovsyanyko-kulikovsky
syntax of the russian language
syntactic agreement
adjective
noun
cognitive-evolutionary theory of language
surface perception
theory of argumentation
title D. M. Ovsianyko-Kulikovsky as an Orthologist: the Cognitive-evolutionary Coverage
title_full D. M. Ovsianyko-Kulikovsky as an Orthologist: the Cognitive-evolutionary Coverage
title_fullStr D. M. Ovsianyko-Kulikovsky as an Orthologist: the Cognitive-evolutionary Coverage
title_full_unstemmed D. M. Ovsianyko-Kulikovsky as an Orthologist: the Cognitive-evolutionary Coverage
title_short D. M. Ovsianyko-Kulikovsky as an Orthologist: the Cognitive-evolutionary Coverage
title_sort d m ovsianyko kulikovsky as an orthologist the cognitive evolutionary coverage
topic d. m. ovsyanyko-kulikovsky
syntax of the russian language
syntactic agreement
adjective
noun
cognitive-evolutionary theory of language
surface perception
theory of argumentation
url https://periodicals.karazin.ua/philology/article/view/24757
work_keys_str_mv AT sergiypopov dmovsianykokulikovskyasanorthologistthecognitiveevolutionarycoverage