Pitfalls in interpreting calibration in comparative evaluations of risk models for precision lung cancer screening
Lung cancer screening by low-dose computed tomography reduces lung cancer mortality, but reliable risk-based selection of participants is crucial to maximize benefits and minimize harms. Multiple risk models have been developed for this purpose, and their discrimination and calibration performance i...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Hermann Brenner, Clara Frick, Teresa Seum, Megha Bhardwaj |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | npj Precision Oncology |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-024-00785-6 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Nine‐fold variation of risk of advanced colorectal neoplasms according to smoking and polygenic risk score: Results from a cross‐sectional study in a large screening colonoscopy cohort
by: Ruojin Fu, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Pitfalls and Challenges in the Interpretation of Rectal Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging
by: Abdul Haseeb Wani, et al. -
Improving 10-year cardiovascular risk prediction in patients with type 2 diabetes with metabolomics
by: Ruijie Xie, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Common Pitfalls in the Interpretation of COVID-19 Data and Statistics
by: Andreas Backhaus
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Calibrated Interpretation: Confidence Estimation in Semantic Parsing
by: Elias Stengel-Eskin, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)