Position for Site-Specific Attachment of a DOTA Chelator to Synthetic Affibody Molecules Has a Different Influence on the Targeting Properties of Ga-Compared to In-Labeled Conjugates

Affibody molecules, small (7 kDa) scaffold proteins, are a promising class of probes for radionuclide molecular imaging. Radiolabeling of Affibody molecules with the positron-emitting nuclide 68 Ga would permit the use of positron emission tomography (PET), providing better resolution, sensitivity,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hadis Honarvar, Joanna Strand, Anna Perols, Anna Orlova, Ram Kumar Selvaraju, Amelie Eriksson Karlström, Vladimir Tolmachev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2014-12-01
Series:Molecular Imaging
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2014.00034
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841563193141362688
author Hadis Honarvar
Joanna Strand
Anna Perols
Anna Orlova
Ram Kumar Selvaraju
Amelie Eriksson Karlström
Vladimir Tolmachev
author_facet Hadis Honarvar
Joanna Strand
Anna Perols
Anna Orlova
Ram Kumar Selvaraju
Amelie Eriksson Karlström
Vladimir Tolmachev
author_sort Hadis Honarvar
collection DOAJ
description Affibody molecules, small (7 kDa) scaffold proteins, are a promising class of probes for radionuclide molecular imaging. Radiolabeling of Affibody molecules with the positron-emitting nuclide 68 Ga would permit the use of positron emission tomography (PET), providing better resolution, sensitivity, and quantification accuracy than single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The synthetic anti-HER2 Z HER2:S1 Affibody molecule was conjugated with DOTA at the N-terminus, in the middle of helix 3, or at the C-terminus. The biodistribution of 68 Ga- and 111 In-labeled Affibody molecules was directly compared in NMRI nu/nu mice bearing SKOV3 xenografts. The position of the chelator strongly influenced the biodistribution of the tracers, and the influence was more pronounced for 68 Ga-labeled Affibody molecules than for the 111 In-labeled counterparts. The best 68 Ga-labeled variant was 68 Ga-[DOTA-A1]-Z HER2:S1 which provided a tumor uptake of 13 ± 1 %ID/g and a tumor to blood ratio of 39 ± 12 at 2 hours after injection. 111 In-[DOTA-A 1 ]-Z HER2:S1 and 111 In-[DOTA-K 58 ]-Z HER2:S1 were equally good at this time point, providing a tumor uptake of 15 to 16 %ID/g and a tumor to blood ratio in the range of 60 to 80. In conclusion, the selection of the best position for a chelator in Affibody molecules can be used for optimization of their imaging properties. This may be important for the development of Affibody-based and other protein-based imaging probes.
format Article
id doaj-art-0f1eff2373814c25aeda244426c445c4
institution Kabale University
issn 1536-0121
language English
publishDate 2014-12-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Molecular Imaging
spelling doaj-art-0f1eff2373814c25aeda244426c445c42025-01-03T00:10:25ZengSAGE PublishingMolecular Imaging1536-01212014-12-011310.2310/7290.2014.0003410.2310_7290.2014.00034Position for Site-Specific Attachment of a DOTA Chelator to Synthetic Affibody Molecules Has a Different Influence on the Targeting Properties of Ga-Compared to In-Labeled ConjugatesHadis HonarvarJoanna StrandAnna PerolsAnna OrlovaRam Kumar SelvarajuAmelie Eriksson KarlströmVladimir TolmachevAffibody molecules, small (7 kDa) scaffold proteins, are a promising class of probes for radionuclide molecular imaging. Radiolabeling of Affibody molecules with the positron-emitting nuclide 68 Ga would permit the use of positron emission tomography (PET), providing better resolution, sensitivity, and quantification accuracy than single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). The synthetic anti-HER2 Z HER2:S1 Affibody molecule was conjugated with DOTA at the N-terminus, in the middle of helix 3, or at the C-terminus. The biodistribution of 68 Ga- and 111 In-labeled Affibody molecules was directly compared in NMRI nu/nu mice bearing SKOV3 xenografts. The position of the chelator strongly influenced the biodistribution of the tracers, and the influence was more pronounced for 68 Ga-labeled Affibody molecules than for the 111 In-labeled counterparts. The best 68 Ga-labeled variant was 68 Ga-[DOTA-A1]-Z HER2:S1 which provided a tumor uptake of 13 ± 1 %ID/g and a tumor to blood ratio of 39 ± 12 at 2 hours after injection. 111 In-[DOTA-A 1 ]-Z HER2:S1 and 111 In-[DOTA-K 58 ]-Z HER2:S1 were equally good at this time point, providing a tumor uptake of 15 to 16 %ID/g and a tumor to blood ratio in the range of 60 to 80. In conclusion, the selection of the best position for a chelator in Affibody molecules can be used for optimization of their imaging properties. This may be important for the development of Affibody-based and other protein-based imaging probes.https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2014.00034
spellingShingle Hadis Honarvar
Joanna Strand
Anna Perols
Anna Orlova
Ram Kumar Selvaraju
Amelie Eriksson Karlström
Vladimir Tolmachev
Position for Site-Specific Attachment of a DOTA Chelator to Synthetic Affibody Molecules Has a Different Influence on the Targeting Properties of Ga-Compared to In-Labeled Conjugates
Molecular Imaging
title Position for Site-Specific Attachment of a DOTA Chelator to Synthetic Affibody Molecules Has a Different Influence on the Targeting Properties of Ga-Compared to In-Labeled Conjugates
title_full Position for Site-Specific Attachment of a DOTA Chelator to Synthetic Affibody Molecules Has a Different Influence on the Targeting Properties of Ga-Compared to In-Labeled Conjugates
title_fullStr Position for Site-Specific Attachment of a DOTA Chelator to Synthetic Affibody Molecules Has a Different Influence on the Targeting Properties of Ga-Compared to In-Labeled Conjugates
title_full_unstemmed Position for Site-Specific Attachment of a DOTA Chelator to Synthetic Affibody Molecules Has a Different Influence on the Targeting Properties of Ga-Compared to In-Labeled Conjugates
title_short Position for Site-Specific Attachment of a DOTA Chelator to Synthetic Affibody Molecules Has a Different Influence on the Targeting Properties of Ga-Compared to In-Labeled Conjugates
title_sort position for site specific attachment of a dota chelator to synthetic affibody molecules has a different influence on the targeting properties of ga compared to in labeled conjugates
url https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2014.00034
work_keys_str_mv AT hadishonarvar positionforsitespecificattachmentofadotachelatortosyntheticaffibodymoleculeshasadifferentinfluenceonthetargetingpropertiesofgacomparedtoinlabeledconjugates
AT joannastrand positionforsitespecificattachmentofadotachelatortosyntheticaffibodymoleculeshasadifferentinfluenceonthetargetingpropertiesofgacomparedtoinlabeledconjugates
AT annaperols positionforsitespecificattachmentofadotachelatortosyntheticaffibodymoleculeshasadifferentinfluenceonthetargetingpropertiesofgacomparedtoinlabeledconjugates
AT annaorlova positionforsitespecificattachmentofadotachelatortosyntheticaffibodymoleculeshasadifferentinfluenceonthetargetingpropertiesofgacomparedtoinlabeledconjugates
AT ramkumarselvaraju positionforsitespecificattachmentofadotachelatortosyntheticaffibodymoleculeshasadifferentinfluenceonthetargetingpropertiesofgacomparedtoinlabeledconjugates
AT amelieerikssonkarlstrom positionforsitespecificattachmentofadotachelatortosyntheticaffibodymoleculeshasadifferentinfluenceonthetargetingpropertiesofgacomparedtoinlabeledconjugates
AT vladimirtolmachev positionforsitespecificattachmentofadotachelatortosyntheticaffibodymoleculeshasadifferentinfluenceonthetargetingpropertiesofgacomparedtoinlabeledconjugates