Comparison of models to predict incident chronic liver disease: a systematic review and external validation in Chinese adults

Abstract Background Risk prediction models can identify individuals at high risk of chronic liver disease (CLD), but there is limited evidence on the performance of various models in diverse populations. We aimed to systematically review CLD prediction models, meta-analyze their performance, and ext...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xue Cong, Shuyao Song, Yingtao Li, Kaiyang Song, Cameron MacLeod, Yujie Cheng, Jun Lv, Canqing Yu, Dianjianyi Sun, Pei Pei, Ling Yang, Yiping Chen, Iona Millwood, Shukuan Wu, Xiaoming Yang, Rebecca Stevens, Junshi Chen, Zhengming Chen, Liming Li, Christiana Kartsonaki, Yuanjie Pang, on behalf of the China Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative Group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2024-12-01
Series:BMC Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03754-9
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841559336480931840
author Xue Cong
Shuyao Song
Yingtao Li
Kaiyang Song
Cameron MacLeod
Yujie Cheng
Jun Lv
Canqing Yu
Dianjianyi Sun
Pei Pei
Ling Yang
Yiping Chen
Iona Millwood
Shukuan Wu
Xiaoming Yang
Rebecca Stevens
Junshi Chen
Zhengming Chen
Liming Li
Christiana Kartsonaki
Yuanjie Pang
on behalf of the China Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative Group
author_facet Xue Cong
Shuyao Song
Yingtao Li
Kaiyang Song
Cameron MacLeod
Yujie Cheng
Jun Lv
Canqing Yu
Dianjianyi Sun
Pei Pei
Ling Yang
Yiping Chen
Iona Millwood
Shukuan Wu
Xiaoming Yang
Rebecca Stevens
Junshi Chen
Zhengming Chen
Liming Li
Christiana Kartsonaki
Yuanjie Pang
on behalf of the China Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative Group
author_sort Xue Cong
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Risk prediction models can identify individuals at high risk of chronic liver disease (CLD), but there is limited evidence on the performance of various models in diverse populations. We aimed to systematically review CLD prediction models, meta-analyze their performance, and externally validate them in 0.5 million Chinese adults in the China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB). Methods Models were identified through a systematic review and categorized by the target population and outcomes (hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] and CLD). The performance of models to predict 10-year risk of CLD was assessed by discrimination (C-index) and calibration (observed vs predicted probabilies). Results The systematic review identified 57 articles and 114 models (28.4% undergone external validation), including 13 eligible for validation in CKB. Models with high discrimination (C-index ≥ 0.70) in CKB were as follows: (1) general population: Li-2018 and Wen 1–2012 for HCC, CLivD score (non-lab and lab) and dAAR for CLD; (2) hepatitis B virus (HBV) infected individuals: Cao-2021 for HCC and CAP-B for CLD. In CKB, all models tended to overestimate the risk (O:E ratio 0.55–0.94). In meta-analysis, we further identified models with high discrimination: (1) general population (C-index ≥ 0.70): Sinn-2020, Wen 2–2012, and Wen 3–2012 for HCC, and FIB-4 and Forns for CLD; (2) HBV infected individuals (C-index ≥ 0.80): RWS-HCC and REACH-B IIa for HCC and GAG-HCC for HCC and CLD. Conclusions Several models showed good discrimination and calibration in external validation, indicating their potential feasibility for risk stratification in population-based screening programs for CLD in Chinese adults.
format Article
id doaj-art-0e7abb29ce0d41f4a85e2b8a9ecaf327
institution Kabale University
issn 1741-7015
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medicine
spelling doaj-art-0e7abb29ce0d41f4a85e2b8a9ecaf3272025-01-05T12:32:53ZengBMCBMC Medicine1741-70152024-12-0122111310.1186/s12916-024-03754-9Comparison of models to predict incident chronic liver disease: a systematic review and external validation in Chinese adultsXue Cong0Shuyao Song1Yingtao Li2Kaiyang Song3Cameron MacLeod4Yujie Cheng5Jun Lv6Canqing Yu7Dianjianyi Sun8Pei Pei9Ling Yang10Yiping Chen11Iona Millwood12Shukuan Wu13Xiaoming Yang14Rebecca Stevens15Junshi Chen16Zhengming Chen17Liming Li18Christiana Kartsonaki19Yuanjie Pang20on behalf of the China Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative GroupDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking UniversityMedical Sciences Division, University of OxfordMedical Sciences Division, University of OxfordDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking UniversityDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking UniversityClinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of OxfordClinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of OxfordClinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of OxfordMeilan Center for Disease Control and PreventionClinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of OxfordClinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of OxfordChina National Center for Food Safety Risk AssessmentClinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of OxfordDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking UniversityClinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit (CTSU), Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of OxfordDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking UniversityAbstract Background Risk prediction models can identify individuals at high risk of chronic liver disease (CLD), but there is limited evidence on the performance of various models in diverse populations. We aimed to systematically review CLD prediction models, meta-analyze their performance, and externally validate them in 0.5 million Chinese adults in the China Kadoorie Biobank (CKB). Methods Models were identified through a systematic review and categorized by the target population and outcomes (hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC] and CLD). The performance of models to predict 10-year risk of CLD was assessed by discrimination (C-index) and calibration (observed vs predicted probabilies). Results The systematic review identified 57 articles and 114 models (28.4% undergone external validation), including 13 eligible for validation in CKB. Models with high discrimination (C-index ≥ 0.70) in CKB were as follows: (1) general population: Li-2018 and Wen 1–2012 for HCC, CLivD score (non-lab and lab) and dAAR for CLD; (2) hepatitis B virus (HBV) infected individuals: Cao-2021 for HCC and CAP-B for CLD. In CKB, all models tended to overestimate the risk (O:E ratio 0.55–0.94). In meta-analysis, we further identified models with high discrimination: (1) general population (C-index ≥ 0.70): Sinn-2020, Wen 2–2012, and Wen 3–2012 for HCC, and FIB-4 and Forns for CLD; (2) HBV infected individuals (C-index ≥ 0.80): RWS-HCC and REACH-B IIa for HCC and GAG-HCC for HCC and CLD. Conclusions Several models showed good discrimination and calibration in external validation, indicating their potential feasibility for risk stratification in population-based screening programs for CLD in Chinese adults.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03754-9Risk predictionChronic liver diseaseHepatocellular carcinomaChineseSystematic reviewExternal validation
spellingShingle Xue Cong
Shuyao Song
Yingtao Li
Kaiyang Song
Cameron MacLeod
Yujie Cheng
Jun Lv
Canqing Yu
Dianjianyi Sun
Pei Pei
Ling Yang
Yiping Chen
Iona Millwood
Shukuan Wu
Xiaoming Yang
Rebecca Stevens
Junshi Chen
Zhengming Chen
Liming Li
Christiana Kartsonaki
Yuanjie Pang
on behalf of the China Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative Group
Comparison of models to predict incident chronic liver disease: a systematic review and external validation in Chinese adults
BMC Medicine
Risk prediction
Chronic liver disease
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Chinese
Systematic review
External validation
title Comparison of models to predict incident chronic liver disease: a systematic review and external validation in Chinese adults
title_full Comparison of models to predict incident chronic liver disease: a systematic review and external validation in Chinese adults
title_fullStr Comparison of models to predict incident chronic liver disease: a systematic review and external validation in Chinese adults
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of models to predict incident chronic liver disease: a systematic review and external validation in Chinese adults
title_short Comparison of models to predict incident chronic liver disease: a systematic review and external validation in Chinese adults
title_sort comparison of models to predict incident chronic liver disease a systematic review and external validation in chinese adults
topic Risk prediction
Chronic liver disease
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Chinese
Systematic review
External validation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03754-9
work_keys_str_mv AT xuecong comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT shuyaosong comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT yingtaoli comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT kaiyangsong comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT cameronmacleod comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT yujiecheng comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT junlv comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT canqingyu comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT dianjianyisun comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT peipei comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT lingyang comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT yipingchen comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT ionamillwood comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT shukuanwu comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT xiaomingyang comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT rebeccastevens comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT junshichen comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT zhengmingchen comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT limingli comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT christianakartsonaki comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT yuanjiepang comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults
AT onbehalfofthechinakadooriebiobankcollaborativegroup comparisonofmodelstopredictincidentchronicliverdiseaseasystematicreviewandexternalvalidationinchineseadults