Contrast sensitivity before and after refractive error correction among refractive error patients in Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia 2023

Abstract Background Contrast sensitivity is an important measure of vision quality. Risk of falling injury is strongly associated with poor contrast sensitivity compared with poor near- and distance visual acuity. Since good visual acuity is not necessarily associated with good visual performance in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Balcha Negese Kebede, Seid Mohammed Seid, Eyerus Gesesse Samuel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:BMC Ophthalmology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03817-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841544870782566400
author Balcha Negese Kebede
Seid Mohammed Seid
Eyerus Gesesse Samuel
author_facet Balcha Negese Kebede
Seid Mohammed Seid
Eyerus Gesesse Samuel
author_sort Balcha Negese Kebede
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Contrast sensitivity is an important measure of vision quality. Risk of falling injury is strongly associated with poor contrast sensitivity compared with poor near- and distance visual acuity. Since good visual acuity is not necessarily associated with good visual performance in the “real world” it is important to consider contrast sensitivity when prescribing corrective lenses. There is limited evidence on how refractive error and its correction affect contrast sensitivity in the study area. Therefore, this study is important to understand how refractive correction affects contrast sensitivity, which is important baseline information for prescribing refractive error correction. Objective of this study This study aimed to measure the mean difference in contrast sensitivity with and without corrective lenses in patients with refractive error. Methods Objective and subjective refractions were done for each patient, then Pelli- Robson contrast sensitivity was measured for them using computer based Pelli-Robson chart at 1 m. Pelli- Robson contrast sensitivity value (Log CS) with and without corrective lenses were recorded for each study participant. The collected data were checked for completeness and analyzed using SPSS 26. Descriptive analyses, independent sample t-tests, and one-way ANOVA were performed to compare CS means; the findings are presented using tables and pie charts. A P-value of ≤ 0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance. Results One hundred sixty-two patients attending refraction clinics participated in this study with response rate 98.19% of which 51.9% were male. The mean age of the participants was 34.28 ± 12.79 (SD). The mean contrast sensitivity increased from 1.29 ± 0.35 (SD) to1.51 ± 0.28 (SD) LogCS units with refractive correction (p = 0.000). There is no significant difference in contrast sensitivity between the types of refractive errors. Conclusion and recommendation Uncorrected refractive can affect contrast sensitivity; therefore, proper refractive correction is essential to improve visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.
format Article
id doaj-art-0a2d80f2d6e0455184c4c47064e4a726
institution Kabale University
issn 1471-2415
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Ophthalmology
spelling doaj-art-0a2d80f2d6e0455184c4c47064e4a7262025-01-12T12:12:27ZengBMCBMC Ophthalmology1471-24152025-01-012511610.1186/s12886-024-03817-8Contrast sensitivity before and after refractive error correction among refractive error patients in Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia 2023Balcha Negese Kebede0Seid Mohammed Seid1Eyerus Gesesse Samuel2Hawassa University College of Medicine and Health Sciences Department of Ophthalmology and OptometryHawassa University College of Medicine and Health Sciences Department of Ophthalmology and OptometryHawassa University College of Medicine and Health Sciences Department of Ophthalmology and OptometryAbstract Background Contrast sensitivity is an important measure of vision quality. Risk of falling injury is strongly associated with poor contrast sensitivity compared with poor near- and distance visual acuity. Since good visual acuity is not necessarily associated with good visual performance in the “real world” it is important to consider contrast sensitivity when prescribing corrective lenses. There is limited evidence on how refractive error and its correction affect contrast sensitivity in the study area. Therefore, this study is important to understand how refractive correction affects contrast sensitivity, which is important baseline information for prescribing refractive error correction. Objective of this study This study aimed to measure the mean difference in contrast sensitivity with and without corrective lenses in patients with refractive error. Methods Objective and subjective refractions were done for each patient, then Pelli- Robson contrast sensitivity was measured for them using computer based Pelli-Robson chart at 1 m. Pelli- Robson contrast sensitivity value (Log CS) with and without corrective lenses were recorded for each study participant. The collected data were checked for completeness and analyzed using SPSS 26. Descriptive analyses, independent sample t-tests, and one-way ANOVA were performed to compare CS means; the findings are presented using tables and pie charts. A P-value of ≤ 0.05 was used to indicate statistical significance. Results One hundred sixty-two patients attending refraction clinics participated in this study with response rate 98.19% of which 51.9% were male. The mean age of the participants was 34.28 ± 12.79 (SD). The mean contrast sensitivity increased from 1.29 ± 0.35 (SD) to1.51 ± 0.28 (SD) LogCS units with refractive correction (p = 0.000). There is no significant difference in contrast sensitivity between the types of refractive errors. Conclusion and recommendation Uncorrected refractive can affect contrast sensitivity; therefore, proper refractive correction is essential to improve visual acuity and contrast sensitivity.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03817-8
spellingShingle Balcha Negese Kebede
Seid Mohammed Seid
Eyerus Gesesse Samuel
Contrast sensitivity before and after refractive error correction among refractive error patients in Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia 2023
BMC Ophthalmology
title Contrast sensitivity before and after refractive error correction among refractive error patients in Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia 2023
title_full Contrast sensitivity before and after refractive error correction among refractive error patients in Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia 2023
title_fullStr Contrast sensitivity before and after refractive error correction among refractive error patients in Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia 2023
title_full_unstemmed Contrast sensitivity before and after refractive error correction among refractive error patients in Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia 2023
title_short Contrast sensitivity before and after refractive error correction among refractive error patients in Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia 2023
title_sort contrast sensitivity before and after refractive error correction among refractive error patients in hawassa sidama ethiopia 2023
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03817-8
work_keys_str_mv AT balchanegesekebede contrastsensitivitybeforeandafterrefractiveerrorcorrectionamongrefractiveerrorpatientsinhawassasidamaethiopia2023
AT seidmohammedseid contrastsensitivitybeforeandafterrefractiveerrorcorrectionamongrefractiveerrorpatientsinhawassasidamaethiopia2023
AT eyerusgesessesamuel contrastsensitivitybeforeandafterrefractiveerrorcorrectionamongrefractiveerrorpatientsinhawassasidamaethiopia2023