Comparative analysis of improved m6A sequencing based on antibody optimization for low-input samples

Abstract The most effective method for mapping N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is m6A RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeRIP-seq). The quality of MeRIP-seq relies on various factors, with the anti-m6A antibody being a crucial determinant. However, comprehensive research on anti-m6A antibody selection an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiafeng Lu, Wenjuan Xia, Jincheng Li, Liya Zhang, Chunfeng Qian, Hong Li, Boxian Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85150-8
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841544637874962432
author Jiafeng Lu
Wenjuan Xia
Jincheng Li
Liya Zhang
Chunfeng Qian
Hong Li
Boxian Huang
author_facet Jiafeng Lu
Wenjuan Xia
Jincheng Li
Liya Zhang
Chunfeng Qian
Hong Li
Boxian Huang
author_sort Jiafeng Lu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract The most effective method for mapping N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is m6A RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeRIP-seq). The quality of MeRIP-seq relies on various factors, with the anti-m6A antibody being a crucial determinant. However, comprehensive research on anti-m6A antibody selection and optimal concentrations for different tissues has been limited. In this study, we optimized the concentration of five different anti-m6A antibodies across various tissues. Our findings demonstrated that 5 µg of Millipore antibodies (ABE572 and MABE1006) performed well, starting from 15 µg total RNA from the liver, while 1.25 µg of Cell Signaling Technology antibodies (CST) (#56593) was suitable for low-input total RNA. In summary, we provide a significant guideline for anti-m6A antibody selection in MeRIP sequencing for different tissues, especially in the context of low-input RNA.
format Article
id doaj-art-08a5ca11f54a43878007c9337d3675f5
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-08a5ca11f54a43878007c9337d3675f52025-01-12T12:23:06ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-01-0115111210.1038/s41598-025-85150-8Comparative analysis of improved m6A sequencing based on antibody optimization for low-input samplesJiafeng Lu0Wenjuan Xia1Jincheng Li2Liya Zhang3Chunfeng Qian4Hong Li5Boxian Huang6State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical UniversityState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical UniversityState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical UniversityState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical UniversityState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical UniversityState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical UniversityState Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Gusu School, Nanjing Medical UniversityAbstract The most effective method for mapping N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is m6A RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeRIP-seq). The quality of MeRIP-seq relies on various factors, with the anti-m6A antibody being a crucial determinant. However, comprehensive research on anti-m6A antibody selection and optimal concentrations for different tissues has been limited. In this study, we optimized the concentration of five different anti-m6A antibodies across various tissues. Our findings demonstrated that 5 µg of Millipore antibodies (ABE572 and MABE1006) performed well, starting from 15 µg total RNA from the liver, while 1.25 µg of Cell Signaling Technology antibodies (CST) (#56593) was suitable for low-input total RNA. In summary, we provide a significant guideline for anti-m6A antibody selection in MeRIP sequencing for different tissues, especially in the context of low-input RNA.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85150-8m6A antibodyMeRIP SeqHuman fetal brainHuman fetal liverMouse liverMouse brain
spellingShingle Jiafeng Lu
Wenjuan Xia
Jincheng Li
Liya Zhang
Chunfeng Qian
Hong Li
Boxian Huang
Comparative analysis of improved m6A sequencing based on antibody optimization for low-input samples
Scientific Reports
m6A antibody
MeRIP Seq
Human fetal brain
Human fetal liver
Mouse liver
Mouse brain
title Comparative analysis of improved m6A sequencing based on antibody optimization for low-input samples
title_full Comparative analysis of improved m6A sequencing based on antibody optimization for low-input samples
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of improved m6A sequencing based on antibody optimization for low-input samples
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of improved m6A sequencing based on antibody optimization for low-input samples
title_short Comparative analysis of improved m6A sequencing based on antibody optimization for low-input samples
title_sort comparative analysis of improved m6a sequencing based on antibody optimization for low input samples
topic m6A antibody
MeRIP Seq
Human fetal brain
Human fetal liver
Mouse liver
Mouse brain
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-85150-8
work_keys_str_mv AT jiafenglu comparativeanalysisofimprovedm6asequencingbasedonantibodyoptimizationforlowinputsamples
AT wenjuanxia comparativeanalysisofimprovedm6asequencingbasedonantibodyoptimizationforlowinputsamples
AT jinchengli comparativeanalysisofimprovedm6asequencingbasedonantibodyoptimizationforlowinputsamples
AT liyazhang comparativeanalysisofimprovedm6asequencingbasedonantibodyoptimizationforlowinputsamples
AT chunfengqian comparativeanalysisofimprovedm6asequencingbasedonantibodyoptimizationforlowinputsamples
AT hongli comparativeanalysisofimprovedm6asequencingbasedonantibodyoptimizationforlowinputsamples
AT boxianhuang comparativeanalysisofimprovedm6asequencingbasedonantibodyoptimizationforlowinputsamples