Judicial Performance Review in Arizona: A Critical Assessment
Judicial performance evaluations are a relatively new tool for assessing judges and providing information to voters to help them determine whether to retain judges in contested or retention elections. Arizona implemented its judicial evaluation program about 20 years ago, and since that time, the s...
        Saved in:
      
    
          | Main Authors: | Rebecca White Berch, Erin Norris Bass | 
|---|---|
| Format: | Article | 
| Language: | English | 
| Published: | Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law
    
        2014-02-01 | 
| Series: | Oñati Socio-Legal Series | 
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/309 | 
| Tags: | Add Tag 
      No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
   | 
Similar Items
- 
                
                    Methodologies for Measuring Judicial Performance: The Problem of Bias        
                          
 by: Jennifer Elek, et al.
 Published: (2014-02-01)
- 
                
                    Thinking about Judges and Judicial Performance: Perspective of the Public and Court Users        
                          
 by: David Rottman, et al.
 Published: (2014-02-01)
- 
                
                    Judicial Performance and Experiences of Judicial Work: Findings from Socio-legal Research        
                          
 by: Sharyn Roach Anleu, et al.
 Published: (2014-02-01)
- 
                
                    Judicial Performance and Experiences of Judicial Work: Findings from socio-legal research by Sharyn Roach Anleu & Kathy Mack: Commentary        
                          
 by: Gar Yein Ng
 Published: (2014-12-01)
- 
                
                    Managing the News Image of the Judiciary: the Role of Judicial Press Officers        
                          
 by: Leslie James Moran
 Published: (2014-01-01)
 
       