Judicial Performance Review in Arizona: A Critical Assessment
Judicial performance evaluations are a relatively new tool for assessing judges and providing information to voters to help them determine whether to retain judges in contested or retention elections. Arizona implemented its judicial evaluation program about 20 years ago, and since that time, the s...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Rebecca White Berch, Erin Norris Bass |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law
2014-02-01
|
| Series: | Oñati Socio-Legal Series |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/309 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Methodologies for Measuring Judicial Performance: The Problem of Bias
by: Jennifer Elek, et al.
Published: (2014-02-01) -
Thinking about Judges and Judicial Performance: Perspective of the Public and Court Users
by: David Rottman, et al.
Published: (2014-02-01) -
Judicial Performance and Experiences of Judicial Work: Findings from Socio-legal Research
by: Sharyn Roach Anleu, et al.
Published: (2014-02-01) -
Judicial Performance and Experiences of Judicial Work: Findings from socio-legal research by Sharyn Roach Anleu & Kathy Mack: Commentary
by: Gar Yein Ng
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Managing the News Image of the Judiciary: the Role of Judicial Press Officers
by: Leslie James Moran
Published: (2014-01-01)