Published 2024-08-01
“…First, nominal variables were converted into virtual variables and the assumptions of hierarchical regression were checked and confirmed.The correlation result of predictive variables with subjective well-being are
presented in Table 1.Table 1Correlation of Predictive Variables with Subjective Well-Being Subjective Well-BeinCultural SocializationAzeriKurdishLorGilakGradegenerationmother tongueSubjective Well-Beingr1.000.282**.128**.042.021-.053-.130**.012-.125**p..000.006.414.689.336.000.741.000Cultural Socializationr.282**1.000.130**.165**-.016-.009-.024-.055-.196**p.000..006.001.765.871.519.135.000Table 2 shows the results of hierarchical regression.Table 2Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis of Factors Affecting Subjective Well-BeingModelstandardized CoefficientsBetatpFRR SquareAdjusted R Squareconstant 25.210.001 20.35 0.41 0.17 0.16cultural socialization0.49.710.001mother tongue-0.13-3.030.003grade-0.9-1.90.05Dependent Variable: Subjective Well-BeingTo analyze the hierarchical regression, in the first step, the sociability variable was included in the
model, explaining 14.2% of the variance of subjective well-being (R2 = 0.142) and had a positive and significant effect on well-being (p < 0.0001, 2 t = 9.0, β = 0.38). …”
Get full text
Article