Showing 21 - 40 results of 100 for search '48 Cameras', query time: 0.06s Refine Results
  1. 21
  2. 22
  3. 23
  4. 24
  5. 25
  6. 26
  7. 27
  8. 28

    Biomechanical Characteristics on the Lower Extremity of Three Typical Yoga Manoeuvres by Elizabeth Whissell, Lin Wang, Pan Li, Jing Xian Li, Zhen Wei

    Published 2021-01-01
    “…The triangle pose performed the largest range of motion (ROM) of the hip (90.5°±22.9°), knee (68.8°±23.1°), and ankle (46.4°±11.3°) in the sagittal plane and the hip (54.8°±6.5°), knee (42.4°±12.8°), and ankle (4.8°±1.7°) in the frontal plane amongst the three manoeuvres (P<0.05). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  9. 29
  10. 30

    Hop Distance Symmetry Moderately Reflects Knee Biomechanics Symmetry During Landing But Not For Controlled Propulsions by Stefano Di Paolo, Naoaki Ito, Kayla D. Seymore, Haraldur B. Sigurðsson, Laura Bragonzoni, Stefano Zaffagnini, Lynn Snyder-Mackler, Karin Gravare Silbernagel

    Published 2024-08-01
    “…In the triple hop, positive correlation was found at peak propulsion (ρ= 0.38, p=0.027), peak landing (ρ= 0.48 – 0.66, p<0.001), and last landing IC (ρ= 0.45, p=0.009). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  11. 31

    Video Kinematic Analysis of Timed Up and Go Test in Convalescent Stroke Patients by CAI Tongxin, LEI Mincong, ZHOU Yijun, MENG Dianhuai

    Published 2023-10-01
    “…The TUG test were recorded by cameras for all subjects. VirtualDube 2<sup>®</sup> software was used to analyze the kinematic characteristics of the recorded video, including the total time and sub-stages parameters (stage 1 standing up, stage 2 forward walking, stage 3 first turning, stage 4 return walking, stage 5 end turning and sitting down);Moreover, the observation group also received 5 times of sit-to-stand test, single leg support time and 10-meter walking test speed.ResultsCompared with the control group, the observation group had a significant increase in the time of total TUG [26.91 (16.52, 35.98) s] and the sub-stages [1.98 (1.13, 2.48), 8.15 (4.21, 13.02), 4.15 (3.84, 5.93), 6.10 (3.08, 9.94), 5.04 (3.82, 7.03) s] (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05), and there were significant differences in the percentage distribution of each sub-stage (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  12. 32
  13. 33
  14. 34
  15. 35
  16. 36
  17. 37
  18. 38
  19. 39
  20. 40