Search alternatives:
"the prediction value" » "the reduction value" (Expand Search)
Showing 1,781 - 1,800 results of 6,452 for search '(((("the predictive value") OR ("the prediction value"))) OR ("the education value"))', query time: 0.36s Refine Results
  1. 1781

    Updating AFP Level in Chronic Hepatitis B to Evaluate the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Occurrence by Juferdy Kurniawan, Jane Andrea Christiano Djianzonie, Edi Mulyana, Dicky Levenus Tahapary, Andri Sanityoso Sulaiman, Ika Prasetya Wijaya, Sally Aman Nasution, Siti Setiati

    Published 2024-07-01
    “…Results: For HCC surveillance caused by hepatitis B virus, ROC curve analysis resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.792 (95% CI, 0.719-0.866), and the cut-off value with the highest Youden index was 8.7 ng/ml, with 58% sensitivity, 94% specificity, positive predictive value (PPV)  56.14%, negative predictive value (NPV) 94.43%, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) 10.08, and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) 0.46. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  2. 1782

    Using a transformer language model to curate a pulmonary embolism dataset from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV: MIMIC-IV-Ext-PE by Barbara D. Lam, Shengling Ma, Iuliia Kovalenko, Peiqi Wang, Omid Jafari, Ang Li, Steven Horng

    Published 2025-05-01
    “…Diagnosis codes had a sensitivity of 95.4% and a positive predictive value of 83.8% in the subset of 11,990 reports with an associated discharge diagnosis code. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  3. 1783
  4. 1784

    An alternative colorimetric RT-LAMP assay for the rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2: development and validation in Thailand by Wiphat Klayut, Thanee Wongchai, Nattagarn Chuenchom, Payu Bhakdeenuan, Supranee Bunchoo, Sopa Srisungngam, Sirilada Suphankong, Benjawan Phetsuksiri, Ballang Uppapong, Janisara Rudeeaneksin

    Published 2024-08-01
    “…The assay demonstrated diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 90.48% (95% CI: 86.36–93.68%), 87.00% (95% CI: 81.53–91.33%), 100% (95% CI: 95.07–100%), 100% (95% CI: not available), and 73.74% (95% CI: 66.22–80.07%), respectively, compared to the rtRT-PCR. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  5. 1785
  6. 1786

    Lung cancer screening in Finland: a prospective randomized trial by Viktor Wichmann, Sanna Iivanainen, Lauri Mattila, Veli-Pekka Kokkonen, Airi Jartti, Antti Kurtti, Riitta Kaarteenaho, Heidi Andersen, Antti Jekunen, Tuula Vasankari, Jussi Koivunen

    Published 2025-06-01
    “…The screening examination uptake was high with both screening rounds, while the positive predictive value for lung cancer detection remained at good level. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  7. 1787
  8. 1788

    Identifying malignant pleural effusion from tubercular pleural effusion by study of cancer ratio and cancer ratio plus by Subhankar Saren, Animesh Mandal, Amit Kumar Das, Ranjit Kumar Haldar, Sudipta Pandit

    Published 2025-02-01
    “…Both CR and CR plus had sensitivity of 95.12% (95% CI 80.03–98.64), specificity of 80% (95% CI 60.80–91.16), positive predictive value of 90.69, and negative predictive value of 88.88 in diagnosing MPE. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  9. 1789

    Updating AFP Level in Chronic Hepatitis B to Evaluate the Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Occurrence by Juferdy Kurniawan, Jane Andrea Christiano Djianzonie, Edi Mulyana, Dicky Levenus Tahapary, Andri Sanityoso Sulaiman, Ika Prasetya Wijaya, Sally Aman Nasution, Siti Setiati

    Published 2024-10-01
    “…Results: For HCC surveillance caused by hepatitis B virus, ROC curve analysis resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.792 (95% CI, 0.719-0.866), and the cut-off value with the highest Youden index was 8.7 ng/ml, with 58% sensitivity, 94% specificity, positive predictive value (PPV)  56.14%, negative predictive value (NPV) 94.43%, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) 10.08, and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) 0.46. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  10. 1790

    Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for the Assessment of Small Renal Mass: A Prospective Study by Jae-Wook Chung, Seo Young Park, Seunghee Woo, Yun Ah Kim, Jun-Koo Kang, Yun-Sok Ha, Jun Nyung Lee, Bum Soo Kim, Tae-Hwan Kim, Ghil Suk Yoon, Tae Gyun Kwon, See Hyung Kim

    Published 2024-07-01
    “…The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of KDCT were 89.3%, 10.0%, 73.5%, and 25.0%, respectively. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  11. 1791

    Evaluation of CE-MATRIX-Enhanced FLAIR imaging in the detection of leptomeningeal metastasis by Junhui Yuan, Shaobo Fang, Fan Meng, Yue Wu, Dongqiu Shan, Chunmiao Xu, Renzhi Zhang, Xuejun Chen

    Published 2025-04-01
    “…Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated and compared using Z-tests. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  12. 1792

    The Prognostic Role of Serum Procalcitonin for Adult Patients with Acute Diarrhea in the Emergency Department by Antonella Gallo, Marcello Covino, Eleonora Ianua’, Andrea Piccioni, Davide Della Polla, Benedetta Simeoni, Francesco Franceschi, Francesco Landi, Massimo Montalto

    Published 2025-03-01
    “…</b> Of a total of 1910 patients, early PCT values (cut-off of 0.5 ng/mL) did not show a significant predictive value for infective diarrhea (OR 0.554 [0.395–0.778]), nor for bacterial diarrhea (OR 0.596 [0.405–0.875]). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  13. 1793

    Impact of Rosacea on Keratinocyte Skin Cancers: A Prospective Case-Control Study of Basal and Squamous Cell Carcinoma Risk by Asli Aksu, Aysenur Demir, Hatice Gunay, Pinar Ozdemir Cetinkaya, Birgul Ozkesici Kurt, Hazel Ezgi Kaya, Ilknur Altunay, Deniz Altınel

    Published 2025-07-01
    “…The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value for rosacea were 45.5%, 86%, 61.2% and 76.5%, respectively (AUC 0.658, 95% CI 0.604-0.711, P=0.000), while for ETR it was 44%, 86.5%, 60.7% and 76.5%, respectively (AUC 0.653, 95% CI 0.599-0.706, P=0.000). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  14. 1794

    Magnetic Resonance Imaging Texture Analysis Based on Intraosseous and Extraosseous Lesions to Predict Prognosis in Patients with Osteosarcoma by Yu Mori, Hainan Ren, Naoko Mori, Munenori Watanuki, Shin Hitachi, Mika Watanabe, Shunji Mugikura, Kei Takase

    Published 2024-11-01
    “…The model from intraosseous lesions on the T1-weighted images showed the highest diagnostic performance in discriminating 3-year non-survivors from survivors (AUCs of 0.99 and 0.88 in the training and validation sets) with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 85.7%, 92.6%, 75.0%, and 96.2%, respectively. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  15. 1795

    Synoptic reporting accuracy for computed tomography pulmonary arteriography among patients suspected of pulmonary embolism by Isabela A. Woller, Scott C. Woller, Scott M. Stevens, James F. Lloyd, Karen E. Conner, Benjamin H. Gordon, Greg L. Snow, Peter Jones, Joseph R. Bledsoe

    Published 2022-10-01
    “…Results Synoptic reporting and manual review agreed in 99.2% of patients undergoing CTPA for suspected PE, agreed on the presence of PE in 196 of 199 (98.5%) cases, the absence of PE in 200 of 200 (100%) cases with a sensitivity of 87.6% (76.1–96.1) a specificity of 99.9% (99.7%–100%), a positive predictive value of 99.5% (98.1–100), and a negative predictive value of 98% (95.7%–99.5%). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  16. 1796

    Automated post-run analysis of arrayed quantitative PCR amplification curves using machine learning [version 1; peer review: awaiting peer review] by David Garrett Brown, Darwin J. Operario, Lan Wang, Shanrui Wu, Daniel T. Leung, Eric R. Houpt, James A. Platts-Mills, Jie Liu, Ben J. Brintz

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…We used 5-fold cross-validation to tune the models and assessed performance using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and mean absolute error (MAE). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  17. 1797

    Using machine learning to develop a stacking ensemble learning model for the CT radiomics classification of brain metastases by Huai-wen Zhang, Yi-ren Wang, Bo Hu, Bo Song, Zhong-jian Wen, Lei Su, Xiao-man Chen, Xi Wang, Ping Zhou, Xiao-ming Zhong, Hao-wen Pang, You-hua Wang

    Published 2024-11-01
    “…Multiple evaluation metrics, including the specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, accuracy, Matthews correlation coefficient, and the Youden index, were used to assess the model’s performance. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  18. 1798

    Hereditary angioedema diagnosis evaluation score (HADES): A new clinical scoring system for predicting hereditary angioedema with C1 inhibitor deficiency by Ricardo Zwiener, MD, Rafael Zamora, MD, Carlos María Galmarini, MD, PhD, Laura Brion, PhD, Laura Arias, MD, Andrea Pino, MD, Paula Rozenfeld, PhD

    Published 2025-05-01
    “…The predictive score demonstrated favorable performance in identifying HAE cases within the index population (range, 0-18.5), with low scores (1.5-6.5) associated with high sensitivity (100%) and negative predictive value (100%), and high scores (≥15) associated with high specificity (99.4%) and positive predictive value (75.0%). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  19. 1799

    Using machine learning models to predict post-revascularization thrombosis in PAD by Samir Ghandour, Adriana A. Rodriguez Alvarez, Isabella F. Cieri, Shiv Patel, Mounika Boya, Rahul Chaudhary, Rahul Chaudhary, Rahul Chaudhary, Anna Poucey, Anahita Dua

    Published 2025-05-01
    “…Model performance was assessed by area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value.ResultsOf the 308 patients analyzed, 66% were male, 84% were White, and 18.3% experienced an ATE during the one-year post-revascularization follow-up period. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  20. 1800

    Diagnostic value of serum origin recognition complex protein 1 in the progression of HBVrelated liver fibrosis by LIANG Hongqian, HUANG Long, REN Aoli, SU Minghua, HU Bobin, LI Qingmei, SU Tumei, YIN Qianbing, LI Aining, JIANG Jianning

    Published 2024-12-01
    “…The area under the ROC curve of serum ORC1 in the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis was 0.644 (P < 0.05), the cutoff value was 1, 000.46 ng/L and the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and consistency rate were 56.0%, 76.3%, 35.0%, 88.4%, and 72.5%, respectively. …”
    Get full text
    Article