-
2041
The Value of PET/CT-Based Radiomics in Predicting Adrenal Metastases in Patients with Cancer
Published 2025-05-01“…The AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of XGBoost’s internal and external validation were 0.945, 0.932, 0.930, 0.960, 0.970, 0.890 and 0.910, 0.900, 0.860, 1, 1, 0.750. …”
Get full text
Article -
2042
Comparative performance and health economic analysis of prenatal screening for down syndrome in Fujian province, China
Published 2025-07-01“…A comparison of screening performance between the two groups showed that NIPT had significantly higher specificity (99.96%) and positive predictive value (55.56%) than FTSS (specificity: 92.93%, positive predictive value: 0.91%). …”
Get full text
Article -
2043
Exploratory Analysis of Concordance Between Clinician-Collected and Self-Sampled Human Papillomavirus Tests in a Small Cohort of Average- and High-Risk Patients
Published 2024-04-01“…We assessed hrHPV positivity, concordance, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity across both methods (for types 16, 18, or other hrHPV). …”
Get full text
Article -
2044
Chicken Weight Prediction in Close House Farm Using Fuzzy Method
Published 2024-10-01“…The accuracy of the prediction value with the Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) mean test shows the value of 5,3981%. …”
Get full text
Article -
2045
Research on traction load forecasting of electrified railway
Published 2023-03-01“…The comparative experiments carried out on the real operation data of a traction substation on Shuohuang railway verify the advantage of the proposed method, where the point forecasting can obtain the prediction value with an error of about 7%, and the probabilistic forecasting can obtain the reliable prediction interval under different confidence coefficients.…”
Get full text
Article -
2046
Accuracy of four rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for human leptospirosis diagnosis in Indonesia
Published 2025-06-01“…RDT-2 showed the highest predictive value at 75.9%, while RDT-4 showed the highest negative predictive value at 96.9%. …”
Get full text
Article -
2047
Predictive machine-learning model for screening iron deficiency without anaemia: a retrospective cohort study
Published 2025-08-01“…At a sensitivity threshold of 70%, the model had a specificity of 75.85%, with a positive predictive value of 37.6% and a negative predictive value of 92.41%. …”
Get full text
Article -
2048
Performance of UF-5000 in rapidly screening out urinary tract infection, predicting Gram-negative bacteria infection
Published 2024-12-01“…was associated with a specificity of 94.0% and a positive predictive value of 87.2% in the detection of Gram-negative bacteria. …”
Get full text
Article -
2049
Effects of HALP Score, C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio, and Platelet/Lymphocyte Ratio on Predicting Mortality in Geriatric Patients in the Respiratory Intensive Care Unit
Published 2025-06-01“…HALP score ≤ 9.94 indicates mortality, with a sensitivity of 67.25%, specificity of 53%, PPV (positive predictive value) of 64.98%, and NPV (negative predictive value) of 55%. …”
Get full text
Article -
2050
A study on the prediction of targeted therapy efficacy in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR mutations using CT-based delta-radiomics model
Published 2025-05-01“…Performance was assessed via AUC, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), DeLong’s test, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis.ResultsIn the pre-treatment radiomics model, the AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the training cohorts were 0.751, 0.690, 0.737, 0.639, 0.683, and 0.697; in validation cohorts, these values were 0.726, 0.656, 0.778, 0.500, 0.667, and 0.636. …”
Get full text
Article -
2051
Predicting Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in Individuals Below Screening Age Using Machine Learning and Real-World Data: Case Control Study
Published 2025-06-01“…We conducted a comprehensive performance evaluation using metrics including area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and F1 ResultsThe final cohort included 1358 CC cases with 6790 matched controls, and 560 RC cases with 2800 matched controls. …”
Get full text
Article -
2052
Prognostic Significance of Computed Tomography‐Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Long‐Term Outcomes in Individuals With Coronary Artery Disease
Published 2025-01-01“…Background Data on the predictive value of coronary computed tomography angiography–derived fractional flow reserve (CT‐FFR) for long‐term outcomes are limited. …”
Get full text
Article -
2053
Biochemical, sex hormonal, and anthropometric predictors of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in polycystic ovary syndrome
Published 2025-03-01“…The receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were used to determine cut-off values and evaluate diagnostic accuracy. …”
Get full text
Article -
2054
Estimated glucose disposal rate outperforms other insulin resistance surrogates in predicting incident cardiovascular diseases in cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome stages 0–...
Published 2025-04-01“…Seven machine learning models were utilized to assess the predictive value of the eGDR index for CVD events. To assess the model’s performance, we applied receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and precision-recall (PR) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. …”
Get full text
Article -
2055
Real-World Analysis of Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Outcomes, and the Novel Predictive Model for Patients with Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura (TTP) and TTP-Like Syndrom...
Published 2025-03-01“…The performance of this new model was compared with the traditional PLASMIC score by evaluating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).Results: Thirty-five patients were diagnosed with TTP and 42 were diagnosed with TTP-like syndrome. …”
Get full text
Article -
2056
Clinical Application of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG Antibody Detection Using the Colloidal Gold Immunochromatography Assay
Published 2023-11-01“…The clinical diagnostic results were used as controls to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), kappa, and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the rapid tests. …”
Get full text
Article -
2057
Expression of Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding protein 3 and its diagnostic value in breast cancer
Published 2025-07-01“…The results showed that the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of IGF2BP3 positive prediction for breast cancer were 11.4%, 100.0%, 100.0%, and 18.5%, respectively; and for TNBC, the corresponding values for IGF2BP3 positive prediction were 38.0%, 98.2%, 88.2%, and 81.5%, respectively. …”
Get full text
Article -
2058
Comparative study of Bupivacaine with magnesium sulfate versus bupivacaine with dexmedetomidine in peripheral nerve stimulator-guided transversus abdominis plane block for post-ope...
Published 2024-12-01“…The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of combined BRAF ICC with RT-PCR was 96.8%, 100%, 100%, 90%, and 97.5%, respectively, on cellblock in malignant thyroid lesions. …”
Get full text
Article -
2059
Diagnostic value of multiparametric ultrasound and the EU-TIRADS system for differentiation of focal thyroid lesions
Published 2020-09-01“…The characteristics of the SWE score were: sensitivity = 81%, specificity = 90.3%, positive predictive value = 88%, negative predictive value = 91%, and accuracy of comprehensive study = 88.4%.…”
Get full text
Article -
2060
Directions for Improving the Laboratory Component in Secondary Prevention of Cervical Cancer
Published 2024-09-01“…HSIL is more commonly associated with viruses of alpha-9 phylogenetic group, than with alpha-7 and alpha-5/6. The positive predictive value for HSIL+ is reduced depending on the HPV type: 16>33>58>35>45>31>18>52>39>59>58>56>68>66. …”
Get full text
Article