Search alternatives:
"the predictive value" » "the prediction value" (Expand Search)
"the reduction value" » "the education value" (Expand Search)
"the predictive value" » "the prediction value" (Expand Search)
"the reduction value" » "the education value" (Expand Search)
-
201
Redefining Liver Fibrosis Risk Assessment in Indians with Type 2 Diabetes: New FIB-4 Score Cutoff for Optimizing Sequential Assessment with Transient Elastography
Published 2025-03-01“…We found that a FIB-4 of 1.5 rules out CSLF with a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and Diagnostic Accuracy (DA) of 82.9%, 79.9%, 55.7%, 93.8%, and 80.6%, respectively, compared with a FIB4 of 1.3 which has values of 91.5%, 67.3%, 46.1%, 96.2%, and 72.9%, respectively. …”
Get full text
Article -
202
Identification of the most common pathogenic bacteria in patients with suspected sepsis by multiplex PCR
Published 2014-04-01“…Results: The sensitivity and specificity for universal PCR and multiplex PCR in comparison with BC were 83.87% and 91.58%, and 74.19% and 91.58%, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) for these two PCRs were 76.47% and 94.57%, and 74.19% and 91.58%, respectively. …”
Get full text
Article -
203
Labour Admission Test - A low cost alternative to predict foetal distress and neonatal outcomes
Published 2020-12-01“…A statistical analysis comparing normal and abnormal (suspicious + pathological) AT showed high specificity 83.82% and high negative predictive value 92.95%. However, LAT was found to have low sensitivity 59.26% and low positive predictive value 36.36%. …”
Get full text
Article -
204
Epidemiological study of human brucellosis among febrile patients in Erbil-Kurdistan region, Iraq
Published 2022-07-01“…The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the Rose Bengal Test in comparison to the blood culture were 100%, 96.9%, 77.5 %, and 100% respectively. …”
Get full text
Article -
205
ASAS criteria for inflammatory back pain: diagnostic significance in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
Published 2019-05-01“…In our study, the sensitivity of the ASAS criteria for IBD was 76.9% and specificity – 67.2%, positive predictive value was 0.51, a negative predictive value – 0.87. …”
Get full text
Article -
206
Evaluating alternatives to the Widal test for typhoid fever diagnosis in developing countries: A targeted literature review
Published 2025-02-01“…Results: The mean sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the Widal test in this study were 62.94 ± 17.83 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 49.23–76.64); 73.31 ± 18.75 (95% CI: 58.89–87.73); 58.85 ± 40.07 (95% CI: 16.80–100.90) and 75.96 ± 25.93 (95% CI: 46.08–100.45), respectively. …”
Get full text
Article -
207
Exercise Right Ventricular‐Pulmonary Arterial Coupling and Functional Outcome in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Secondary Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation
Published 2025-04-01“…Linear mixed models were used to evaluate the predictive value of preoperative echocardiographic parameters on the longitudinal distribution of the 6‐minute walking test. …”
Get full text
Article -
208
Evaluation of a Machine Learning Model Based on Laboratory Parameters for the Prediction of Influenza A and B in Chongqing, China: Multicenter Model Development and Validation Stud...
Published 2025-05-01“…Routine blood parameters offer promising predictive value but lack integration into intelligent diagnostic systems for influenza subtyping. …”
Get full text
Article -
209
Utility of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for the diagnosis of multicentric breast cancer
Published 2022-01-01“…The high negative predictive value of CESM (97.6 %) confirms the fact that this modality is an effective method for planning surgery and radiation therapy.…”
Get full text
Article -
210
Usefulness of the AHEAD score for prediction of all-cause death in patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes
Published 2025-09-01“…Conclusions: The AHEAD score demonstrated superior predictive value for ACD compared to the CHADS2 score in patients with CAD, regardless of whether they had ACS or CCS.…”
Get full text
Article -
211
THE DIAGNOSTIC VALUE OF PLATELET-DERIVED FACTOR PDGF-BB AND ST2 IN HEART REJECTION
Published 2017-01-01“…PDGF-BB has moderate predictive value for heart rejection. The highest predictive value for heart rejection was reached by a panel of three biomarkers: sCD40L, PlGF-1 and ST2.…”
Get full text
Article -
212
Surgical difficulty assessment during transalveolar extraction of impacted mandibular third molars using two indices: A prospective comparative study
Published 2025-01-01“…Results and Discussion: Gbotolorun index had a better predictive ability than the Pederson index (sensitivity: 66.7% vs. 40.0%; specificity: 87.1% vs. 69.4%; positive predictive value: 55.6% vs. 24%; negative predictive value: 91.5% vs. 82.7%; predictive accuracy: 83.1% vs. 63.6%; and kappa correlation 67.5% vs. 42.9%). …”
Get full text
Article -
213
Rapid bedside testing for septic arthritis: evaluating cost-effective diagnostic tools
Published 2025-07-01“…The LE strip test showed a sensitivity of 92%, specificity of 70%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 60%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 94%. …”
Get full text
Article -
214
Salivary Interleukin-6 and C-Reactive Protein/Mean Platelet Volume Ratio in the Diagnosis of Late-Onset Neonatal Pneumonia
Published 2021-01-01“…The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of salivary IL-6, serum IL-6, and CRP/MPV ratio for the diagnosis of late-onset neonatal pneumonia were determined. …”
Get full text
Article -
215
18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnosis of suspected paraneoplastic syndromes: A retrospective analysis
Published 2020-04-01“…The diagnostic values are as follows: sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 94.3%, positive predictive value 66.7%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 97.6%. …”
Get full text
Article -
216
Evaluation of Sensitivity and Specificity of Acuity 360 Telemedicine Vision Screening System
Published 2024-12-01“…The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), false-negative rate, and inter-rater agreement were calculated.Results: Compared to in-person clinic examination, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and false-negative rate for the optical coherence tomography (OCT) of optic nerve were 95.8%, 98.5%, 86.8%, 99.6%, 0.39% and for the combined retina examination (OCT of the macula and widefield fundus photography) were 93.4%, 88.5%, 80.2%, 96.4%, 2.19%, respectively. …”
Get full text
Article -
217
What is the role of rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19 IgM/IgG in the pre-operative period of cosmetic plastic surgery?
Published 2021-03-01“…The sensitivity varied from 18.4 to 100%; the positive predictive value between 19.7 and 100%; specificity between 94 and 100%; and the negative predictive value between 20 and 100%. …”
Get full text
Article -
218
Estimation levels of CTHRC1and some cytokines in Iraqi patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
Published 2023-06-01“…The level of CTHRC1 (> 25.385 ng/ml) in combination with the levels of CRP and ACPA provided a good indication of RA prediction with sensitivity = 71.0%, specificity = 100.0%, accuracy = 0.71%, positive predictive value (PPV) = 100.0%, and negative predictive value (NPV) = 46.3%. …”
Get full text
Article -
219
Feasibility of a rapid C-reactive protein chairside point-of-care test for detecting inflammation in exposed dental pulp: a pilot exploratory study
Published 2025-05-01“…The test demonstrated an observed sensitivity of 94.3%, specificity of 87.1%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 90.7%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 91.9%. …”
Get full text
Article -
220
Determining Surgeon’s Accuracy in Predicting the Severity of Appendicitis in Children: A Comparison Between Clinical Diagnosis and Intraoperative Findings
Published 2025-07-01“…Conclusion: Surgeon prediction was compared with intraoperative findings which were statistically significant with P = 0.0004, a sensitivity of 70.59%, and a specificity of 90.91% (accuracy – 82.05%, positive predictive value – 81.24%, and negative predictive value – 84.72%). …”
Get full text
Article