Published 2025-04-01
“…There was lower energy expenditure at 580 °C (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">E</mi><mrow><mi>s</mi><mi>p</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>) (33.48 kJ), 550 °C (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi mathvariant="normal">E</mi><mrow><mi>s</mi><mi>p</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> = 37.97 kJ), <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><msub><mi>CO</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> mass captured (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mrow><msub><mi>CO</mi><mn>2</mn></msub><mrow><mi>c</mi><mi>a</mi><mi>p</mi></mrow></mrow></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> = 9.80 mg), and the samples exhibited a
more preserved surface, thus making it the most suitable option for scale-up applications.…”
Get full text
Article