Showing 121 - 140 results of 260 for search '"solar wind"', query time: 0.08s Refine Results
  1. 121
  2. 122
  3. 123
  4. 124

    Magnetopause Standoff Position Changes and Geosynchronous Orbit Crossings: Models and Observations by Y. M. Collado‐Vega, P. Dredger, R. E. Lopez, S. Khurana, L. Rastaetter, D. Sibeck, M. Anastopulos

    Published 2023-06-01
    “…The magnetopause position prediction and response time to the solar wind changes is then compared to extreme solar wind conditions where magnetopause crossing of geosynchronous orbit have been observed by the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite (GOES) satellites. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  5. 125

    Quantifying the Uncertainty in CME Kinematics Derived From Geometric Modeling of Heliospheric Imager Data by L. Barnard, M. J. Owens, C. J. Scott, M. Lockwood, C. A. deKoning, T. Amerstorfer, J. Hinterreiter, C. Möstl, J. A. Davies, P. Riley

    Published 2022-01-01
    “…We use a large number of Cone CME simulations with the HUXt solar wind model to quantify the scale of uncertainty introduced into geometric modeling and the ELEvoHI CME arrival times by solar wind structure. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  6. 126

    Investigating Potential Causes for the Prediction of Spurious Magnetopause Crossings at Geosynchronous Orbit in MHD Simulations by Pauline M. Dredger, Ramon E. Lopez, Yaireska M. Collado‐Vega, Shreeya Khurana, Lutz M. Rastaetter

    Published 2023-06-01
    “…Spacecraft operators turn to numerical models to predict the response of the magnetopause to solar wind conditions, but the predictions of the models are not always accurate. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  7. 127

    SIR‐HUXt—A Particle Filter Data Assimilation Scheme for CME Time‐Elongation Profiles by Luke Barnard, Mathew Owens, Chris Scott, Matthew Lang, Mike Lockwood

    Published 2023-06-01
    “…The idealized scenario studied here likely enhances SIR‐HUXt's performance relative to the challenge of simulating real‐world CMEs and solar wind conditions. Future work should validate SIR‐HUXt with case studies of real CMEs in structured solar wind.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  8. 128
  9. 129

    A Framework for Understanding and Quantifying the Loss and Acceleration of Relativistic Electrons in the Outer Radiation Belt During Geomagnetic Storms by Kyle R. Murphy, Ian R. Mann, David G. Sibeck, I. Jonathan Rae, C.E.J. Watt, Louis G. Ozeke, Shri G. Kanekal, Daniel N. Baker

    Published 2020-05-01
    “…During the second phase, radiation belt enhancements are well organized by the amplitude of ultralow frequency waves, the auroral electroject index, and solar wind energy input. Overall, our results demonstrate that storm time dynamics of the RBC is repeatable and well characterized by solar wind and geomagnetic driving, albeit with different dependencies during the two phases of a storm.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  10. 130

    Geosynchronous Magnetopause Crossings and Their Relationships With Magnetic Storms and Substorms by A. A. Samsonov, Y. V. Bogdanova, G. Branduardi‐Raymont, L. Xu, J. Zhang, D. Sormakov, O. A. Troshichev, C. Forsyth

    Published 2021-06-01
    “…The difference might be explained by the different behavior of the solar wind velocity.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  11. 131

    Space Weather Forecasts of Ground Level Space Weather in the UK: Evaluating Performance and Limitations by A. W. Smith, I. J. Rae, C. Forsyth, J. C. Coxon, M.‐T. Walach, C. J. Lao, D. S. Bloomfield, S. A. Reddy, M. K. Coughlan, A. Keesee, S. Bentley

    Published 2024-11-01
    “…Abstract Geomagnetically Induced Currents (GICs) are a severe space weather hazard, driven through coupling between the solar wind and magnetosphere. GICs are rarely measured directly, instead the ground magnetic field variability is often used as a proxy. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  12. 132

    Sensitivity of Model Estimates of CME Propagation and Arrival Time to Inner Boundary Conditions by Lauren A. James, Christopher J. Scott, Luke A. Barnard, Mathew J. Owens, Matthew S. Lang, Shannon R. Jones

    Published 2023-04-01
    “…For the 12 December 2008 Earth‐directed CME event, we compute ensembles using the HUXt solar wind model to analyze CME distortion with a structured solar wind and explore hindcast arrival time error (ATE). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  13. 133

    Forecasting the Probability of Large Rates of Change of the Geomagnetic Field in the UK: Timescales, Horizons, and Thresholds by A. W. Smith, C. Forsyth, I. J. Rae, T. M. Garton, T. Bloch, C. M. Jackman, M. Bakrania

    Published 2021-09-01
    “…We attribute this to the use of propagated solar wind data not allowing the models notice to forecast impulsive phenomenon. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  14. 134

    Meeting Report: International Magnetosphere Coupling IV (IMC‐IV) Workshop GFZ‐Potsdam, Germany, 2–7 June 2024 by Julia Himmelsbach, Yuri Y. Shprits

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…Abstract The International Magnetospheric Coupling (IMC‐IV) Workshop was held from 2–7 June 2024, at GFZ‐Potsdam, Germany and convened over 140 scientists to explore the solar wind and magnetosphere‐ionosphere‐thermosphere coupling. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  15. 135

    Large Geomagnetically Induced Currents at Equator Caused by an Interplanetary Magnetic Cloud by B. Nilam, S. Tulasi Ram

    Published 2022-06-01
    “…Abstract Here, we report a rare observation of an extremely large and rapid change of geomagnetic field (dB/dt), a proxy for the geomagnetically induced currents (GICs), at the equator caused by a sudden drop in solar wind density at the front boundary of a magnetic cloud (MC) during the great 31 March 2001 storm. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  16. 136

    MHD‐Test Particles Simulations of Moderate CME and CIR‐Driven Geomagnetic Storms at Solar Minimum by Mary K. Hudson, Scot R. Elkington, Zhao Li, Maulik Patel, Kevin Pham, Kareem Sorathia, Alex Boyd, Allison Jaynes, Alexis Leali

    Published 2021-12-01
    “…Abstract As part of the Whole Heliosphere and Planetary Interactions initiative, contrasting drivers of radiation belt electron response at solar minimum have been investigated with MHD‐test particle simulations for the May 13–14, 2019 Coronal Mass Ejection (CME)‐shock event and the August 30–September 3, 2019 high speed solar wind interval. Both solar wind drivers produced moderate geomagnetic storms characterized by a minimum Dst = −65 nT and −52 nT, respectively, with the August ‐ September event accompanied by prolonged substorm activity. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  17. 137

    Probabilistic Forecasting of Ground Magnetic Perturbation Spikes at Mid‐Latitude Stations by Michael Coughlan, Amy Keesee, Victor Pinto, Raman Mukundan, José Paulo Marchezi, Jeremiah Johnson, Hyunju Connor, Don Hampton

    Published 2023-06-01
    “…Overall, we find that the models using both the solar wind and ground magnetometer data had better metric scores than the solar wind only and persistence models, and was able to capture more spatially localized variations in the dB/dt threshold crossings.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  18. 138

    Predictive Capabilities of Corotating Interaction Regions Using STEREO and Wind In‐Situ Observations by Yutian Chi, Chenglong Shen, Christopher Scott, Mengjiao Xu, Mathew Owens, Yuming Wang, Mike Lockwood

    Published 2022-07-01
    “…Abstract Solar wind stream interaction regions (SIRs) and corotating interaction regions (CIRs) can cause geomagnetic storms and change energetic particle environment, ionospheric composition on Earth. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  19. 139

    Relativistic Electron Model in the Outer Radiation Belt Using a Neural Network Approach by Xiangning Chu, Donglai Ma, Jacob Bortnik, W. Kent Tobiska, Alfredo Cruz, S. Dave Bouwer, Hong Zhao, Qianli Ma, Kun Zhang, Daniel N. Baker, Xinlin Li, Harlan Spence, Geoff Reeves

    Published 2021-12-01
    “…The Outer RadIation belt Electron Neural net model for Relativistic electrons (ORIENT‐R) uses only solar wind conditions and geomagnetic indices as input. …”
    Get full text
    Article
  20. 140

    Calculating the High‐Latitude Ionospheric Electrodynamics Using a Machine Learning‐Based Field‐Aligned Current Model by V. Sai Gowtam, Hyunju Connor, Bharat S. R. Kunduri, Joachim Raeder, Karl M. Laundal, S. Tulasi Ram, Dogacan S. Ozturk, Donald Hampton, Shibaji Chakraborty, Charles Owolabi, Amy Keesee

    Published 2024-04-01
    “…ML‐AIM is unique and innovative because it predicts ionospheric responses to the time‐varying solar wind and geomagnetic conditions, while the other traditional empirical models like Weimer (2005, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004ja010884) designed to provide a quasi‐static ionospheric condition under quasi‐steady solar wind/IMF conditions. …”
    Get full text
    Article