Showing 1 - 4 results of 4 for search '"Lysholm score"', query time: 0.03s Refine Results
  1. 1

    Impact of Graft Tunnel Placement on Short-Term Clinical Outcome Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction by Rogger M, Al-Dadah O

    Published 2025-07-01
    “…Overall, no significant correlation was demonstrated between graft tunnel placement and PROM scores, except for a weak association between femoral tunnel positioning on lateral view radiographs and the overall Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (rho=0.37, p=0.038) and the Lysholm score (rho=0.36, p=0.034) and also tibial tunnel placement on lateral view radiographs and the EQ-5D VAS score (rho=0.37, p=0.037). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  2. 2

    Application of mechanical quantitative techniques in postoperative rehabilitation assessment of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A study protocol. by Zhichun Zhu, Jianyun Zhang, Wenxiang Ouyang, Tiantian Li, Jinsong Xiong, Mi Fan, Jing Guo, Peng Wang, Yongqing Tong, Yulu Yao

    Published 2025-01-01
    “…The assessment protocol will consist of traditional knee functional assessments, including knee muscle strength, range of motion, and Lysholm scores, as well as mechanical quantitative assessments of the quadriceps and hamstrings.…”
    Get full text
    Article
  3. 3

    ACL repair vs. reconstruction: a meta-analysis of outcomes across different tear characteristics by Hongcheng Zheng, Yongtao Zeng, Nacke Daoerji, Husen Wang, Bin Tang, Li Shu

    Published 2025-08-01
    “…Failure/Revision Rates: Repair demonstrated numerically higher failure rates (OR = 2.24, 95% CI 1.30–3.86, P = 0.004) and revision rates (OR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.21–3.33, P = 0.007) versus reconstruction.Hardware removal: increased hardware removal incidence was observed in repair groups (OR = 8.19, 95% CI 2.89–23.20, P < 0.001).AP knee laxity: reconstruction showed marginally lower AP knee laxity (WMD = 0.30, 95% CI 0.06–0.53, P = 0.01).Patient-reported outcomes: no significant differences in IKDC (WMD = 1.31,95%CI: −0.01–2.63;P = 0.05) or Tegner scores (WMD: 0.01; 95% CI: -0.28– 0.30;P = 0.94). Lysholm scores slightly favored reconstruction (WMD = 1.62,; 95% CI: 0.35–2.89;P = 0.01).Key subgroup findings: repair achieved comparable outcomes to reconstruction in: (1) RCT-designed studies, (2) Acute repairs (< 21 days post-injury). …”
    Get full text
    Article
  4. 4

    Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using the Press‐Fit‐Hybrid technique—A cohort study with an up to 10‐year follow‐up by Niko Schauer, Martin Fischer, Rejane Golbach, David A. Groneberg, Fabian Holzgreve, Daniel Niederer, Daniela Ohlendorf, Adalbert Missalla

    Published 2025-04-01
    “…Subjective knee function was self‐reported using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores. The level of sport activities was assessed using the Tegner Activity Scale (TAS), and quality of life was evaluated with the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Quality of Life subscale (KOOS‐QoL). …”
    Get full text
    Article