A note of caution on CJEU databases
The purpose of this short research note is to draw attention to two major pitfalls of working with databases of decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The first one is technical in nature and relates to the discrepant coverage of the Curia and Eur-Lex databases. The second one is l...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2024-06-01
|
| Series: | European Law Open |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2752613524000171/type/journal_article |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846132965159993344 |
|---|---|
| author | Michal Ovádek |
| author_facet | Michal Ovádek |
| author_sort | Michal Ovádek |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The purpose of this short research note is to draw attention to two major pitfalls of working with databases of decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The first one is technical in nature and relates to the discrepant coverage of the Curia and Eur-Lex databases. The second one is linguistic in nature and relates to the fact that most scholars using these databases work in English. New work on this front is capable of addressing the first issue but a change to research practices would be required to address the second. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-fed66fc07fc541b88c5599cd85763b3c |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2752-6135 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-06-01 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | European Law Open |
| spelling | doaj-art-fed66fc07fc541b88c5599cd85763b3c2024-12-09T14:21:14ZengCambridge University PressEuropean Law Open2752-61352024-06-01335335910.1017/elo.2024.17A note of caution on CJEU databasesMichal Ovádek0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2552-2580Department of Political Science, University College London, London, UKThe purpose of this short research note is to draw attention to two major pitfalls of working with databases of decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union. The first one is technical in nature and relates to the discrepant coverage of the Curia and Eur-Lex databases. The second one is linguistic in nature and relates to the fact that most scholars using these databases work in English. New work on this front is capable of addressing the first issue but a change to research practices would be required to address the second.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2752613524000171/type/journal_articleEuropean Court of Justicedatabasecase lawEU lawtext-as-data |
| spellingShingle | Michal Ovádek A note of caution on CJEU databases European Law Open European Court of Justice database case law EU law text-as-data |
| title | A note of caution on CJEU databases |
| title_full | A note of caution on CJEU databases |
| title_fullStr | A note of caution on CJEU databases |
| title_full_unstemmed | A note of caution on CJEU databases |
| title_short | A note of caution on CJEU databases |
| title_sort | note of caution on cjeu databases |
| topic | European Court of Justice database case law EU law text-as-data |
| url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2752613524000171/type/journal_article |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT michalovadek anoteofcautiononcjeudatabases AT michalovadek noteofcautiononcjeudatabases |