Patient stratification by genetic risk in Alzheimer's disease is only effective in the presence of phenotypic heterogeneity.

Case-only designs in longitudinal cohorts are a valuable resource for identifying disease-relevant genes, pathways, and novel targets influencing disease progression. This is particularly relevant in Alzheimer's disease (AD), where longitudinal cohorts measure disease "progression," d...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jack Euesden, Muhammad Ali, Chloe Robins, Praveen Surendran, Padhraig Gormley, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI), David Pulford, Carlos Cruchaga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2025-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310977
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841533207090036736
author Jack Euesden
Muhammad Ali
Chloe Robins
Praveen Surendran
Padhraig Gormley
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)
David Pulford
Carlos Cruchaga
author_facet Jack Euesden
Muhammad Ali
Chloe Robins
Praveen Surendran
Padhraig Gormley
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)
David Pulford
Carlos Cruchaga
author_sort Jack Euesden
collection DOAJ
description Case-only designs in longitudinal cohorts are a valuable resource for identifying disease-relevant genes, pathways, and novel targets influencing disease progression. This is particularly relevant in Alzheimer's disease (AD), where longitudinal cohorts measure disease "progression," defined by rate of cognitive decline. Few of the identified drug targets for AD have been clinically tractable, and phenotypic heterogeneity is an obstacle to both clinical research and basic science. In four cohorts (n = 7241), we performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and Mendelian randomization (MR) to discover novel targets associated with progression and assess causal relationships. We tested opportunities for patient stratification by deriving polygenic risk scores (PRS) for AD risk and severity and tested the value of these scores in predicting progression. Genome-wide association studies identified no loci associated with progression at genome-wide significance (α = 5×10-8); MR analyses provided no significant evidence of an association between cognitive decline in AD patients and protein levels in brain, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma. Polygenic risk scores for AD risk did not reliably stratify fast from slow progressors; however, a deeper investigation found that APOE ε4 status predicts amyloid-β and tau positive versus negative patients (odds ratio for an additional APOE ε4 allele = 5.78 [95% confidence interval: 3.76-8.89], P<0.001) when restricting to a subset of patients with available CSF biomarker data. These results provided no evidence for large-effect, common-variant loci involved in the rate of memory decline, suggesting that patient stratification based on common genetic risk factors for progression may have limited utility. Where clinically relevant biomarkers suggest diagnostic heterogeneity, there is evidence that a priori identified genetic risk factors may have value in patient stratification. Mendelian randomization was less tractable due to the lack of large-effect loci, and future analyses with increased samples sizes are needed to replicate and validate our results.
format Article
id doaj-art-fe99ff4d952f4876a20c270400ddf341
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-fe99ff4d952f4876a20c270400ddf3412025-01-17T05:31:23ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032025-01-01201e031097710.1371/journal.pone.0310977Patient stratification by genetic risk in Alzheimer's disease is only effective in the presence of phenotypic heterogeneity.Jack EuesdenMuhammad AliChloe RobinsPraveen SurendranPadhraig GormleyAlzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)David PulfordCarlos CruchagaCase-only designs in longitudinal cohorts are a valuable resource for identifying disease-relevant genes, pathways, and novel targets influencing disease progression. This is particularly relevant in Alzheimer's disease (AD), where longitudinal cohorts measure disease "progression," defined by rate of cognitive decline. Few of the identified drug targets for AD have been clinically tractable, and phenotypic heterogeneity is an obstacle to both clinical research and basic science. In four cohorts (n = 7241), we performed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and Mendelian randomization (MR) to discover novel targets associated with progression and assess causal relationships. We tested opportunities for patient stratification by deriving polygenic risk scores (PRS) for AD risk and severity and tested the value of these scores in predicting progression. Genome-wide association studies identified no loci associated with progression at genome-wide significance (α = 5×10-8); MR analyses provided no significant evidence of an association between cognitive decline in AD patients and protein levels in brain, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma. Polygenic risk scores for AD risk did not reliably stratify fast from slow progressors; however, a deeper investigation found that APOE ε4 status predicts amyloid-β and tau positive versus negative patients (odds ratio for an additional APOE ε4 allele = 5.78 [95% confidence interval: 3.76-8.89], P<0.001) when restricting to a subset of patients with available CSF biomarker data. These results provided no evidence for large-effect, common-variant loci involved in the rate of memory decline, suggesting that patient stratification based on common genetic risk factors for progression may have limited utility. Where clinically relevant biomarkers suggest diagnostic heterogeneity, there is evidence that a priori identified genetic risk factors may have value in patient stratification. Mendelian randomization was less tractable due to the lack of large-effect loci, and future analyses with increased samples sizes are needed to replicate and validate our results.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310977
spellingShingle Jack Euesden
Muhammad Ali
Chloe Robins
Praveen Surendran
Padhraig Gormley
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)
David Pulford
Carlos Cruchaga
Patient stratification by genetic risk in Alzheimer's disease is only effective in the presence of phenotypic heterogeneity.
PLoS ONE
title Patient stratification by genetic risk in Alzheimer's disease is only effective in the presence of phenotypic heterogeneity.
title_full Patient stratification by genetic risk in Alzheimer's disease is only effective in the presence of phenotypic heterogeneity.
title_fullStr Patient stratification by genetic risk in Alzheimer's disease is only effective in the presence of phenotypic heterogeneity.
title_full_unstemmed Patient stratification by genetic risk in Alzheimer's disease is only effective in the presence of phenotypic heterogeneity.
title_short Patient stratification by genetic risk in Alzheimer's disease is only effective in the presence of phenotypic heterogeneity.
title_sort patient stratification by genetic risk in alzheimer s disease is only effective in the presence of phenotypic heterogeneity
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0310977
work_keys_str_mv AT jackeuesden patientstratificationbygeneticriskinalzheimersdiseaseisonlyeffectiveinthepresenceofphenotypicheterogeneity
AT muhammadali patientstratificationbygeneticriskinalzheimersdiseaseisonlyeffectiveinthepresenceofphenotypicheterogeneity
AT chloerobins patientstratificationbygeneticriskinalzheimersdiseaseisonlyeffectiveinthepresenceofphenotypicheterogeneity
AT praveensurendran patientstratificationbygeneticriskinalzheimersdiseaseisonlyeffectiveinthepresenceofphenotypicheterogeneity
AT padhraiggormley patientstratificationbygeneticriskinalzheimersdiseaseisonlyeffectiveinthepresenceofphenotypicheterogeneity
AT alzheimersdiseaseneuroimaginginitiativeadni patientstratificationbygeneticriskinalzheimersdiseaseisonlyeffectiveinthepresenceofphenotypicheterogeneity
AT davidpulford patientstratificationbygeneticriskinalzheimersdiseaseisonlyeffectiveinthepresenceofphenotypicheterogeneity
AT carloscruchaga patientstratificationbygeneticriskinalzheimersdiseaseisonlyeffectiveinthepresenceofphenotypicheterogeneity