Assessing Mechanical Difference in Fulcrums for Balanced Cable Bone Segment Transport

Background: Multiple options exist for fulcrums in balanced cable bone segment transport (BC-BST) procedures, but there is no consensus among orthopedic surgeons on best practices. Aims and Objectives: This study investigates the mechanical differences between a variety of fulcrums used to perform t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rhys Leigh Richmond, Stephanie V. Kaszuba, Steven M. Tommasini, David B. Frumberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-12-01
Series:Journal of Limb Lengthening & Reconstruction
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jllr.jllr_13_24
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Multiple options exist for fulcrums in balanced cable bone segment transport (BC-BST) procedures, but there is no consensus among orthopedic surgeons on best practices. Aims and Objectives: This study investigates the mechanical differences between a variety of fulcrums used to perform this reconstructive technique. Materials and Methods: A custom testing rig was built to determine the tension-modifying effects of different fulcrums on the BC-BST system. Results: The stiffness of the system was inversely related to the displacement of the spring, and the least stiff system occurred in fulcrums without threads and of larger diameter. Conclusion: These observed differences suggest that the diameter and type of fulcrum used impact the BC-BST system and there may be an opportunity for greater personalization of the pull tension.
ISSN:2455-3719