Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Different Composite Restorative Materials after Thermocycling and Prolonged Immersion in Common Beverages Using Atomic Force Microscopy—In Vitro Study
Background: Direct composite restorations face abrupt temperature changes, varying pH, and surface deterioration in the oral environment. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) provides visual and numerical data on surface roughness. Aim: This study evaluates and compares the surface roughness of composite r...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2024-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_731_24 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1841544179168051200 |
---|---|
author | Akanksha Malik Anjali K. Kothari Riya Dave Vinay V. Rao Kaushal Vyas Deep P. Agrawal Kishan Patel |
author_facet | Akanksha Malik Anjali K. Kothari Riya Dave Vinay V. Rao Kaushal Vyas Deep P. Agrawal Kishan Patel |
author_sort | Akanksha Malik |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background:
Direct composite restorations face abrupt temperature changes, varying pH, and surface deterioration in the oral environment. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) provides visual and numerical data on surface roughness.
Aim:
This study evaluates and compares the surface roughness of composite restorative materials after simulating oral conditions.
Materials and Methods:
Three composite groups (n = 16 each) were tested. Group A: Microhybrid, Group B: Nanofilled, and Group C: Nanohybrid. Each group was divided into four subgroups (n = 4 each): distilled water (control), black coffee, Coca-Cola, and Red Bull. After thermocycling and immersion, surface roughness was measured using AFM.
Results:
Nanocomposites with uniform monomodal fillers showed the least surface disintegration and superior properties.
Conclusion:
Resin chemistry, including filler size and matrix composition, is crucial for composite properties and performance under function. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-fcdc386ed25d40b494151e8c17407ba7 |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 0976-4879 0975-7406 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences |
spelling | doaj-art-fcdc386ed25d40b494151e8c17407ba72025-01-12T14:13:09ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences0976-48790975-74062024-12-0116Suppl 4S3251S325310.4103/jpbs.jpbs_731_24Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Different Composite Restorative Materials after Thermocycling and Prolonged Immersion in Common Beverages Using Atomic Force Microscopy—In Vitro StudyAkanksha MalikAnjali K. KothariRiya DaveVinay V. RaoKaushal VyasDeep P. AgrawalKishan PatelBackground: Direct composite restorations face abrupt temperature changes, varying pH, and surface deterioration in the oral environment. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) provides visual and numerical data on surface roughness. Aim: This study evaluates and compares the surface roughness of composite restorative materials after simulating oral conditions. Materials and Methods: Three composite groups (n = 16 each) were tested. Group A: Microhybrid, Group B: Nanofilled, and Group C: Nanohybrid. Each group was divided into four subgroups (n = 4 each): distilled water (control), black coffee, Coca-Cola, and Red Bull. After thermocycling and immersion, surface roughness was measured using AFM. Results: Nanocomposites with uniform monomodal fillers showed the least surface disintegration and superior properties. Conclusion: Resin chemistry, including filler size and matrix composition, is crucial for composite properties and performance under function.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_731_24atomic force microscopedirect compositesnanocompositesthermocycling |
spellingShingle | Akanksha Malik Anjali K. Kothari Riya Dave Vinay V. Rao Kaushal Vyas Deep P. Agrawal Kishan Patel Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Different Composite Restorative Materials after Thermocycling and Prolonged Immersion in Common Beverages Using Atomic Force Microscopy—In Vitro Study Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences atomic force microscope direct composites nanocomposites thermocycling |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Different Composite Restorative Materials after Thermocycling and Prolonged Immersion in Common Beverages Using Atomic Force Microscopy—In Vitro Study |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Different Composite Restorative Materials after Thermocycling and Prolonged Immersion in Common Beverages Using Atomic Force Microscopy—In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Different Composite Restorative Materials after Thermocycling and Prolonged Immersion in Common Beverages Using Atomic Force Microscopy—In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Different Composite Restorative Materials after Thermocycling and Prolonged Immersion in Common Beverages Using Atomic Force Microscopy—In Vitro Study |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Surface Roughness of Different Composite Restorative Materials after Thermocycling and Prolonged Immersion in Common Beverages Using Atomic Force Microscopy—In Vitro Study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of surface roughness of different composite restorative materials after thermocycling and prolonged immersion in common beverages using atomic force microscopy in vitro study |
topic | atomic force microscope direct composites nanocomposites thermocycling |
url | https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_731_24 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT akankshamalik comparativeevaluationofsurfaceroughnessofdifferentcompositerestorativematerialsafterthermocyclingandprolongedimmersionincommonbeveragesusingatomicforcemicroscopyinvitrostudy AT anjalikkothari comparativeevaluationofsurfaceroughnessofdifferentcompositerestorativematerialsafterthermocyclingandprolongedimmersionincommonbeveragesusingatomicforcemicroscopyinvitrostudy AT riyadave comparativeevaluationofsurfaceroughnessofdifferentcompositerestorativematerialsafterthermocyclingandprolongedimmersionincommonbeveragesusingatomicforcemicroscopyinvitrostudy AT vinayvrao comparativeevaluationofsurfaceroughnessofdifferentcompositerestorativematerialsafterthermocyclingandprolongedimmersionincommonbeveragesusingatomicforcemicroscopyinvitrostudy AT kaushalvyas comparativeevaluationofsurfaceroughnessofdifferentcompositerestorativematerialsafterthermocyclingandprolongedimmersionincommonbeveragesusingatomicforcemicroscopyinvitrostudy AT deeppagrawal comparativeevaluationofsurfaceroughnessofdifferentcompositerestorativematerialsafterthermocyclingandprolongedimmersionincommonbeveragesusingatomicforcemicroscopyinvitrostudy AT kishanpatel comparativeevaluationofsurfaceroughnessofdifferentcompositerestorativematerialsafterthermocyclingandprolongedimmersionincommonbeveragesusingatomicforcemicroscopyinvitrostudy |