Extensible lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach for sanders type II and III calcaneal fractures osteosynthesis: a randomized controlled trial of 186 fractures

Abstract Aims Which is the best extensile lateral (ELA) or sinus tarsi (STA) approach for osteosynthesis displaced intraarticular calcaneal fracture (DIACF) is still debatable. The current RCT’s primary objective was to compare the complications incidence after open reduction and internal fixation o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amr A. Fadle, Ahmed A. Khalifa, Peter Mamdouh Shehata, Wael EL-Adly, Ahmed Ekram Osman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05345-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841559258819198976
author Amr A. Fadle
Ahmed A. Khalifa
Peter Mamdouh Shehata
Wael EL-Adly
Ahmed Ekram Osman
author_facet Amr A. Fadle
Ahmed A. Khalifa
Peter Mamdouh Shehata
Wael EL-Adly
Ahmed Ekram Osman
author_sort Amr A. Fadle
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aims Which is the best extensile lateral (ELA) or sinus tarsi (STA) approach for osteosynthesis displaced intraarticular calcaneal fracture (DIACF) is still debatable. The current RCT’s primary objective was to compare the complications incidence after open reduction and internal fixation of DIACFs through STA vs. ELA. The secondary objectives were the differences in intraoperative radiation exposure, time to fracture union, functional and radiological outcomes. Methods Between August 2020 and February 2023, 157 patients with Sanders type II and III fractures were randomly assigned to either ELA (81 patients with 95 fractures) or STA (76 patients with 91 fractures). The primary outcome was the incidence of complications. The secondary outcomes were Böhler’s and Gissane angles angle, fracture union, and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. Results No statistical differences between both groups regarding basic demographic data, injury characteristics, and fracture classification; however, patients in the STA group were operated upon significantly earlier (4.43 ± 7.37 vs. 7 ± 6.42 days, p = 0.001). STA’s operative time was significantly shorter (55.83 ± 7.35 vs. 89.66 ± 7.12 min, p < 0.05), and no statistical difference regarding intraoperative radiation exposure. The time to fracture union was significantly shorter in STA (6.33 ± 0.8 vs. 7.13 ± 0.7 weeks, p = 0.000). Skin complications (superficial or deep infection) and Subtalar osteoarthritis were significantly higher in ELA (18.9% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.001) and (32.6% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.001), respectively. The radiological parameters were significantly better in STA postoperatively and at the last follow up. The AOFAS scores were significantly better in STA (83.49 ± 7.71 vs. 68.62 ± 7.05, respectively, p = 0.000). Conclusion During osteosynthesis of Sanders type II and III DIACFs, STA is superior to ELA in terms of operating earlier, shorter operative time, fewer complications, and better radiological and functional outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-fc622984c0b5403cb76b73d334170cb3
institution Kabale University
issn 1749-799X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
spelling doaj-art-fc622984c0b5403cb76b73d334170cb32025-01-05T12:41:22ZengBMCJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research1749-799X2025-01-0120111210.1186/s13018-024-05345-zExtensible lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach for sanders type II and III calcaneal fractures osteosynthesis: a randomized controlled trial of 186 fracturesAmr A. Fadle0Ahmed A. Khalifa1Peter Mamdouh Shehata2Wael EL-Adly3Ahmed Ekram Osman4Orthopaedic Department, Assiut Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut UniversityOrthopaedic Department, Qena Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, South Valley UniversityOrthopaedic Department, Assiut Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut UniversityOrthopaedic Department, Assiut Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut UniversityOrthopaedic Department, Assiut Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut UniversityAbstract Aims Which is the best extensile lateral (ELA) or sinus tarsi (STA) approach for osteosynthesis displaced intraarticular calcaneal fracture (DIACF) is still debatable. The current RCT’s primary objective was to compare the complications incidence after open reduction and internal fixation of DIACFs through STA vs. ELA. The secondary objectives were the differences in intraoperative radiation exposure, time to fracture union, functional and radiological outcomes. Methods Between August 2020 and February 2023, 157 patients with Sanders type II and III fractures were randomly assigned to either ELA (81 patients with 95 fractures) or STA (76 patients with 91 fractures). The primary outcome was the incidence of complications. The secondary outcomes were Böhler’s and Gissane angles angle, fracture union, and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score. Results No statistical differences between both groups regarding basic demographic data, injury characteristics, and fracture classification; however, patients in the STA group were operated upon significantly earlier (4.43 ± 7.37 vs. 7 ± 6.42 days, p = 0.001). STA’s operative time was significantly shorter (55.83 ± 7.35 vs. 89.66 ± 7.12 min, p < 0.05), and no statistical difference regarding intraoperative radiation exposure. The time to fracture union was significantly shorter in STA (6.33 ± 0.8 vs. 7.13 ± 0.7 weeks, p = 0.000). Skin complications (superficial or deep infection) and Subtalar osteoarthritis were significantly higher in ELA (18.9% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.001) and (32.6% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.001), respectively. The radiological parameters were significantly better in STA postoperatively and at the last follow up. The AOFAS scores were significantly better in STA (83.49 ± 7.71 vs. 68.62 ± 7.05, respectively, p = 0.000). Conclusion During osteosynthesis of Sanders type II and III DIACFs, STA is superior to ELA in terms of operating earlier, shorter operative time, fewer complications, and better radiological and functional outcomes.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05345-zCalcaneal fracturesExtensible lateral approachSinus tarsi approachcomplications
spellingShingle Amr A. Fadle
Ahmed A. Khalifa
Peter Mamdouh Shehata
Wael EL-Adly
Ahmed Ekram Osman
Extensible lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach for sanders type II and III calcaneal fractures osteosynthesis: a randomized controlled trial of 186 fractures
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
Calcaneal fractures
Extensible lateral approach
Sinus tarsi approach
complications
title Extensible lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach for sanders type II and III calcaneal fractures osteosynthesis: a randomized controlled trial of 186 fractures
title_full Extensible lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach for sanders type II and III calcaneal fractures osteosynthesis: a randomized controlled trial of 186 fractures
title_fullStr Extensible lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach for sanders type II and III calcaneal fractures osteosynthesis: a randomized controlled trial of 186 fractures
title_full_unstemmed Extensible lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach for sanders type II and III calcaneal fractures osteosynthesis: a randomized controlled trial of 186 fractures
title_short Extensible lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach for sanders type II and III calcaneal fractures osteosynthesis: a randomized controlled trial of 186 fractures
title_sort extensible lateral approach versus sinus tarsi approach for sanders type ii and iii calcaneal fractures osteosynthesis a randomized controlled trial of 186 fractures
topic Calcaneal fractures
Extensible lateral approach
Sinus tarsi approach
complications
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05345-z
work_keys_str_mv AT amrafadle extensiblelateralapproachversussinustarsiapproachforsanderstypeiiandiiicalcanealfracturesosteosynthesisarandomizedcontrolledtrialof186fractures
AT ahmedakhalifa extensiblelateralapproachversussinustarsiapproachforsanderstypeiiandiiicalcanealfracturesosteosynthesisarandomizedcontrolledtrialof186fractures
AT petermamdouhshehata extensiblelateralapproachversussinustarsiapproachforsanderstypeiiandiiicalcanealfracturesosteosynthesisarandomizedcontrolledtrialof186fractures
AT waeleladly extensiblelateralapproachversussinustarsiapproachforsanderstypeiiandiiicalcanealfracturesosteosynthesisarandomizedcontrolledtrialof186fractures
AT ahmedekramosman extensiblelateralapproachversussinustarsiapproachforsanderstypeiiandiiicalcanealfracturesosteosynthesisarandomizedcontrolledtrialof186fractures