L’objet de l’art : Cassirer et Fiedler
This paper aims to understand why Ernst Cassirer never published his short but far-reaching reflections on Konrad Fiedler’s theory of art. While both thinkers do share a vision of art as a way to shape (and not simply to imitate) reality, I suggest that they have very different conceptions of artist...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Rémi Mermet |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Presses universitaires de Strasbourg
2021-12-01
|
Series: | Recherches Germaniques |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/rg/7583 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Criticism and Analytical Review on the Art Chapter of the An Essay on Man
by: Reza Mirmobin, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
Emil Utitz et la « science générale de l’art »
by: Lara Bonneau
Published: (2022-12-01) -
¿Es Cassirer un Neokantiano metodológicamente hablando?
by: Massimo Ferrari, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01) -
A Heidegger–Cassirer vita fő kérdései, különös tekintettel a szabadságproblémára
by: Gábor Tóth
Published: (2014-10-01) -
Les envahisseurs de l’espace sont parmi nous : vers une esthétique quotidienne du pixel
by: Anne Besson
Published: (2015-05-01)