The impact of Cochrane Reviews that apply network meta-analysis in clinical guidelines: A systematic review.
<h4>Background</h4>Systematic reviews, such as those prepared by Cochrane, are the strongest evidence on which to base recommendations in clinical guidelines. Network meta-analysis (NMA) can be used to combine the results of studies to compare multiple treatments, which is advantageous o...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Sarah Donegan, James Connor, Zarko Alfirevic, Catrin Tudur-Smith |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2024-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0315563 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Quality of the systematic reviews in cochrane multiple sclerosis related articles
by: Masoud Zeynalzadeh, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Assessing the relevance and uptake of core outcome sets (an agreed minimum collection of outcomes to measure in research studies) in Cochrane systematic reviews: a review
by: Tianjing Li, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
A Randomized Survey of the Preference of Gastroenterologists for a Cochrane Review versus a Traditional Narrative Review
by: John WD McDonald, et al.
Published: (2002-01-01) -
Review of David Carroll Cochran, The Catholic Case Against War: A Brief Guide
by: Marc Tumeinski
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Analytical Approach to the Selection of Research Topics for Gallstone Disease and Acute Cholecystitis (an Overview of Cochrane Reviews)
by: S. I. Panin, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)