Optimal investments in private land conservation depend more on landholder preferences than climate change

Effective private land conservation strategies that consider both landholder preferences and future climatic conditions are critical for preserving biodiversity and ecosystem services. Yet, the interaction and relative importance of these factors for conservation planning performance is unknown. Her...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brooke A Williams, Carla L Archibald, James Brazill-Boast, Michael J Drielsma, Rajesh Thapa, Jamie Love, Frankie H T Cho, Daniel Lunney, James A Fitzsimons, Md Sayed Iftekhar, Jaramar Villarreal-Rosas, Sarah Bekessy, Scott Benitez Hetherington, Clive A McAlpine, Linda J Beaumont, Jillian Thonell, Jonathan R Rhodes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2024-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad8d6b
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846163092435632128
author Brooke A Williams
Carla L Archibald
James Brazill-Boast
Michael J Drielsma
Rajesh Thapa
Jamie Love
Frankie H T Cho
Daniel Lunney
James A Fitzsimons
Md Sayed Iftekhar
Jaramar Villarreal-Rosas
Sarah Bekessy
Scott Benitez Hetherington
Clive A McAlpine
Linda J Beaumont
Jillian Thonell
Jonathan R Rhodes
author_facet Brooke A Williams
Carla L Archibald
James Brazill-Boast
Michael J Drielsma
Rajesh Thapa
Jamie Love
Frankie H T Cho
Daniel Lunney
James A Fitzsimons
Md Sayed Iftekhar
Jaramar Villarreal-Rosas
Sarah Bekessy
Scott Benitez Hetherington
Clive A McAlpine
Linda J Beaumont
Jillian Thonell
Jonathan R Rhodes
author_sort Brooke A Williams
collection DOAJ
description Effective private land conservation strategies that consider both landholder preferences and future climatic conditions are critical for preserving biodiversity and ecosystem services. Yet, the interaction and relative importance of these factors for conservation planning performance is unknown. Here, we assess the importance of considering landholder preferences and climate change for prioritising locations for conservation tenders to recruit landholders for conservation covenants. To achieve this we develop a planning framework that accounts for the tender process to optimise investment across regions and apply it to koala-focused tenders in New South Wales, Australia, exploring four planning approaches that consider or are ignorant to landholder preferences or climate change. We find that optimal investments depend more on landholder preferences than climate change, and when landholder preferences are ignored, there is little benefit in accounting for climate change. Our analysis reveals new insights into this important interaction.
format Article
id doaj-art-f84f9cf5f2b44880ac058c3d373a841c
institution Kabale University
issn 1748-9326
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj-art-f84f9cf5f2b44880ac058c3d373a841c2024-11-19T16:49:22ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262024-01-01191212404710.1088/1748-9326/ad8d6bOptimal investments in private land conservation depend more on landholder preferences than climate changeBrooke A Williams0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0692-7507Carla L Archibald1https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1640-8396James Brazill-Boast2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3816-9755Michael J Drielsma3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1346-5208Rajesh Thapa4Jamie Love5Frankie H T Cho6https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1369-4980Daniel Lunney7https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5771-0746James A Fitzsimons8https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4277-8040Md Sayed Iftekhar9https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2827-2943Jaramar Villarreal-Rosas10https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6056-3268Sarah Bekessy11https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0503-1979Scott Benitez Hetherington12https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3500-6314Clive A McAlpine13https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0457-8144Linda J Beaumont14https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6307-1680Jillian Thonell15Jonathan R Rhodes16https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6746-7412School of Biology and Environmental Science, Queensland University of Technology , Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia; School of the Environment, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD 4072, AustraliaSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University , 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC 3125, AustraliaNSW Biodiversity Conservation Trust, Locked Bag 5022, Parramatta , NSW 2124, AustraliaSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England , Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia; NSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Locked Bag 5022, Parramatta , NSW 2124, AustraliaSchool of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England , Armidale, NSW 2351, AustraliaNSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Locked Bag 5022, Parramatta , NSW 2124, AustraliaSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, Queensland University of Technology , Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia; School of the Environment, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; Land, Environment, Economics and Policy Institute , Department of Economics, University of Exeter, Exeter EX44PU, United KingdomFaculty of Science, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney , Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Australian Museum , 1 William Street, Sydney, NSW 2010, AustraliaSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University , 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia; The Nature Conservancy , Suite 2-01, 60 Leicester Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia; School of Law, University of Tasmania , Private Bag 89, Hobart TAS 7001, AustraliaDepartment of Accounting, Finance and Economics, Griffith University , Brisbane, QLD, AustraliaAustralian Rivers Institute, Griffith University , 170 Kessels Road, Nathan, QLD 4111, AustraliaSchool of Global, Urban, and Social Studies, RMIT University , Melbourne, VIC 3000, AustraliaTweed Shire Council , 10-14 Tumbulgum Road, Murwillumbah, NSW 2484, AustraliaSchool of the Environment, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD 4072, AustraliaSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University , Sydney, NSW 2109, AustraliaNSW Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water, Locked Bag 5022, Parramatta , NSW 2124, AustraliaSchool of Biology and Environmental Science, Queensland University of Technology , Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia; School of the Environment, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD 4072, AustraliaEffective private land conservation strategies that consider both landholder preferences and future climatic conditions are critical for preserving biodiversity and ecosystem services. Yet, the interaction and relative importance of these factors for conservation planning performance is unknown. Here, we assess the importance of considering landholder preferences and climate change for prioritising locations for conservation tenders to recruit landholders for conservation covenants. To achieve this we develop a planning framework that accounts for the tender process to optimise investment across regions and apply it to koala-focused tenders in New South Wales, Australia, exploring four planning approaches that consider or are ignorant to landholder preferences or climate change. We find that optimal investments depend more on landholder preferences than climate change, and when landholder preferences are ignored, there is little benefit in accounting for climate change. Our analysis reveals new insights into this important interaction.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad8d6bconservation tenderlandholder behaviourwillingness to acceptkoalaAustraliaprivate protected areas
spellingShingle Brooke A Williams
Carla L Archibald
James Brazill-Boast
Michael J Drielsma
Rajesh Thapa
Jamie Love
Frankie H T Cho
Daniel Lunney
James A Fitzsimons
Md Sayed Iftekhar
Jaramar Villarreal-Rosas
Sarah Bekessy
Scott Benitez Hetherington
Clive A McAlpine
Linda J Beaumont
Jillian Thonell
Jonathan R Rhodes
Optimal investments in private land conservation depend more on landholder preferences than climate change
Environmental Research Letters
conservation tender
landholder behaviour
willingness to accept
koala
Australia
private protected areas
title Optimal investments in private land conservation depend more on landholder preferences than climate change
title_full Optimal investments in private land conservation depend more on landholder preferences than climate change
title_fullStr Optimal investments in private land conservation depend more on landholder preferences than climate change
title_full_unstemmed Optimal investments in private land conservation depend more on landholder preferences than climate change
title_short Optimal investments in private land conservation depend more on landholder preferences than climate change
title_sort optimal investments in private land conservation depend more on landholder preferences than climate change
topic conservation tender
landholder behaviour
willingness to accept
koala
Australia
private protected areas
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ad8d6b
work_keys_str_mv AT brookeawilliams optimalinvestmentsinprivatelandconservationdependmoreonlandholderpreferencesthanclimatechange
AT carlalarchibald optimalinvestmentsinprivatelandconservationdependmoreonlandholderpreferencesthanclimatechange
AT jamesbrazillboast optimalinvestmentsinprivatelandconservationdependmoreonlandholderpreferencesthanclimatechange
AT michaeljdrielsma optimalinvestmentsinprivatelandconservationdependmoreonlandholderpreferencesthanclimatechange
AT rajeshthapa optimalinvestmentsinprivatelandconservationdependmoreonlandholderpreferencesthanclimatechange
AT jamielove optimalinvestmentsinprivatelandconservationdependmoreonlandholderpreferencesthanclimatechange
AT frankiehtcho optimalinvestmentsinprivatelandconservationdependmoreonlandholderpreferencesthanclimatechange
AT daniellunney optimalinvestmentsinprivatelandconservationdependmoreonlandholderpreferencesthanclimatechange
AT jamesafitzsimons optimalinvestmentsinprivatelandconservationdependmoreonlandholderpreferencesthanclimatechange
AT mdsayediftekhar optimalinvestmentsinprivatelandconservationdependmoreonlandholderpreferencesthanclimatechange
AT jaramarvillarrealrosas optimalinvestmentsinprivatelandconservationdependmoreonlandholderpreferencesthanclimatechange
AT sarahbekessy optimalinvestmentsinprivatelandconservationdependmoreonlandholderpreferencesthanclimatechange
AT scottbenitezhetherington optimalinvestmentsinprivatelandconservationdependmoreonlandholderpreferencesthanclimatechange
AT cliveamcalpine optimalinvestmentsinprivatelandconservationdependmoreonlandholderpreferencesthanclimatechange
AT lindajbeaumont optimalinvestmentsinprivatelandconservationdependmoreonlandholderpreferencesthanclimatechange
AT jillianthonell optimalinvestmentsinprivatelandconservationdependmoreonlandholderpreferencesthanclimatechange
AT jonathanrrhodes optimalinvestmentsinprivatelandconservationdependmoreonlandholderpreferencesthanclimatechange