Modeling habitat use of deer in an exurban landscape

Abstract Several wildlife biologists have developed models of habitat suitability for white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Although these analyses have provided insight into factors affecting deer density and distribution over large scales, no studies have modeled habitat use of deer in exurb...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Charles W. Anderson, Clayton K. Nielsen, Daniel J. Storm, Eric M. Schauber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2011-09-01
Series:Wildlife Society Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.39
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846120464230907904
author Charles W. Anderson
Clayton K. Nielsen
Daniel J. Storm
Eric M. Schauber
author_facet Charles W. Anderson
Clayton K. Nielsen
Daniel J. Storm
Eric M. Schauber
author_sort Charles W. Anderson
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Several wildlife biologists have developed models of habitat suitability for white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Although these analyses have provided insight into factors affecting deer density and distribution over large scales, no studies have modeled habitat use of deer in exurban landscapes. We modeled habitat similarity to areas used most intensively by deer in exurban Carbondale, Illinois, USA, during the fawning (15 May–31 Jul) and winter season (15 Dec–15 Mar). We used >15,000 locations from 20 Global Positioning System–collared female deer tracked during 2003–2005, habitat variables, and the Penrose distance statistic for modeling. A positive correlation with number of dwellings (r = 0.45) and coefficient of variation of forest area (r = 0.16) indicated deer avoidance of areas with increased number of dwellings and variation in forest area during the fawning season. Deer decreased winter use of areas as the diversity of land‐cover types (r = 0.64), variation in forest patch size (r = 0.40), and variation of grassland patch size (r = 0.18) increased. Winter habitat use of an area increased as size of forest patch area increased (r = −0.30). This model can be used by wildlife managers to better understand potential deer–human encounters and deer use of the landscape. Alternatively, wildlife managers may use the model to target areas for traditional harvest management or deer removal operations. © 2011 The Wildlife Society.
format Article
id doaj-art-f6e7fa5d84bd49d4a304ec89ebc3b521
institution Kabale University
issn 2328-5540
language English
publishDate 2011-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Wildlife Society Bulletin
spelling doaj-art-f6e7fa5d84bd49d4a304ec89ebc3b5212024-12-16T11:20:37ZengWileyWildlife Society Bulletin2328-55402011-09-0135323524210.1002/wsb.39Modeling habitat use of deer in an exurban landscapeCharles W. Anderson0Clayton K. Nielsen1Daniel J. Storm2Eric M. Schauber3Cooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory and Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Mail Code 6504, Carbondale, IL 62901, USACooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory and Department of Forestry, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Mail Code 6504, Carbondale, IL 62901, USACooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory and Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Mail Code 6504, Carbondale, IL 62901, USACooperative Wildlife Research Laboratory and Department of Zoology, Southern Illinois University Carbondale, Mail Code 6504, Carbondale, IL 62901, USAAbstract Several wildlife biologists have developed models of habitat suitability for white‐tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Although these analyses have provided insight into factors affecting deer density and distribution over large scales, no studies have modeled habitat use of deer in exurban landscapes. We modeled habitat similarity to areas used most intensively by deer in exurban Carbondale, Illinois, USA, during the fawning (15 May–31 Jul) and winter season (15 Dec–15 Mar). We used >15,000 locations from 20 Global Positioning System–collared female deer tracked during 2003–2005, habitat variables, and the Penrose distance statistic for modeling. A positive correlation with number of dwellings (r = 0.45) and coefficient of variation of forest area (r = 0.16) indicated deer avoidance of areas with increased number of dwellings and variation in forest area during the fawning season. Deer decreased winter use of areas as the diversity of land‐cover types (r = 0.64), variation in forest patch size (r = 0.40), and variation of grassland patch size (r = 0.18) increased. Winter habitat use of an area increased as size of forest patch area increased (r = −0.30). This model can be used by wildlife managers to better understand potential deer–human encounters and deer use of the landscape. Alternatively, wildlife managers may use the model to target areas for traditional harvest management or deer removal operations. © 2011 The Wildlife Society.https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.39exurbanhabitatmodelingOdocoileus virginianusPenrose distancewhite‐tailed deer
spellingShingle Charles W. Anderson
Clayton K. Nielsen
Daniel J. Storm
Eric M. Schauber
Modeling habitat use of deer in an exurban landscape
Wildlife Society Bulletin
exurban
habitat
modeling
Odocoileus virginianus
Penrose distance
white‐tailed deer
title Modeling habitat use of deer in an exurban landscape
title_full Modeling habitat use of deer in an exurban landscape
title_fullStr Modeling habitat use of deer in an exurban landscape
title_full_unstemmed Modeling habitat use of deer in an exurban landscape
title_short Modeling habitat use of deer in an exurban landscape
title_sort modeling habitat use of deer in an exurban landscape
topic exurban
habitat
modeling
Odocoileus virginianus
Penrose distance
white‐tailed deer
url https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.39
work_keys_str_mv AT charleswanderson modelinghabitatuseofdeerinanexurbanlandscape
AT claytonknielsen modelinghabitatuseofdeerinanexurbanlandscape
AT danieljstorm modelinghabitatuseofdeerinanexurbanlandscape
AT ericmschauber modelinghabitatuseofdeerinanexurbanlandscape