Trade‐Offs Between Forage Availability, Accessibility, and Predation Risk on Winter Foraging Strategies of Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae)
ABSTRACT Optimal foraging theory (OFT) and the energy maximization hypothesis (EMH) have long been essential when examining wildlife habitat selection. At high latitudes and altitudes, animals in winter face greater limitations in availability and accessibility of forage. Here we explore the foragin...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2024-10-01
|
| Series: | Ecology and Evolution |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70385 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846114702632943616 |
|---|---|
| author | Garrett J. Rawleigh Mark A. Edwards Darren Epperson Scott E. Nielsen |
| author_facet | Garrett J. Rawleigh Mark A. Edwards Darren Epperson Scott E. Nielsen |
| author_sort | Garrett J. Rawleigh |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT Optimal foraging theory (OFT) and the energy maximization hypothesis (EMH) have long been essential when examining wildlife habitat selection. At high latitudes and altitudes, animals in winter face greater limitations in availability and accessibility of forage. Here we explore the foraging behavior of wood bison (Bison bison athabascae) during winter within the Ronald Lake bison herd in northeastern Alberta, Canada, and examine the trade‐offs they face due to limitations in forage abundance and availability (snow conditions), as well as the need to minimize predation risk. We used Global Positioning System (GPS) location data collected from 70 female wood bison to identify winter foraging sites and craters selected by bison to access forage beneath the snow. Within wetlands used by bison we selected 190 pairs of used (foraged) and random (available) sites to test eight a priori hypotheses explaining how bison traded‐off between forage availability, accessibility, and minimizing predation risk. We found with matched‐paired logistic regression that Carex atherodes was 1.21‐times more likely to be selected per unit increase in ground cover, compared to 1.17‐times per unit ground cover for C. aquatilis and C. utriculata. However, all Carex species showed an increase in selection when cover was > 50% cover within individual craters. While the importance of Carex was clear, forage site selection was still inversely related to snow depth. There is also a neutralizing combined effect of snow depth and Carex species ground cover which suggests that bison maximized their energy return by avoiding areas with deep snow (> 30 cm) that demanded intensive cratering, even when highly selected forage was accessible beneath. Avoidance of forage areas with deep snow demonstrates that wood bison employed a foraging strategy that considers both forage availability and environmental conditions, with snow depth being a limiting factor. We highlight the relationship between optimal foraging based on food availability and the trade‐offs within an energy restrictive winter season, furthering the understanding of how large herbivores forage strategically to maximize energy intake in northern environments. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-f6e62b0cf5514e8a967b91f50e30ec29 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2045-7758 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-10-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Ecology and Evolution |
| spelling | doaj-art-f6e62b0cf5514e8a967b91f50e30ec292024-12-20T09:05:58ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582024-10-011410n/an/a10.1002/ece3.70385Trade‐Offs Between Forage Availability, Accessibility, and Predation Risk on Winter Foraging Strategies of Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae)Garrett J. Rawleigh0Mark A. Edwards1Darren Epperson2Scott E. Nielsen3Department of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta CanadaDepartment of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta CanadaDepartment of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta CanadaDepartment of Renewable Resources University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta CanadaABSTRACT Optimal foraging theory (OFT) and the energy maximization hypothesis (EMH) have long been essential when examining wildlife habitat selection. At high latitudes and altitudes, animals in winter face greater limitations in availability and accessibility of forage. Here we explore the foraging behavior of wood bison (Bison bison athabascae) during winter within the Ronald Lake bison herd in northeastern Alberta, Canada, and examine the trade‐offs they face due to limitations in forage abundance and availability (snow conditions), as well as the need to minimize predation risk. We used Global Positioning System (GPS) location data collected from 70 female wood bison to identify winter foraging sites and craters selected by bison to access forage beneath the snow. Within wetlands used by bison we selected 190 pairs of used (foraged) and random (available) sites to test eight a priori hypotheses explaining how bison traded‐off between forage availability, accessibility, and minimizing predation risk. We found with matched‐paired logistic regression that Carex atherodes was 1.21‐times more likely to be selected per unit increase in ground cover, compared to 1.17‐times per unit ground cover for C. aquatilis and C. utriculata. However, all Carex species showed an increase in selection when cover was > 50% cover within individual craters. While the importance of Carex was clear, forage site selection was still inversely related to snow depth. There is also a neutralizing combined effect of snow depth and Carex species ground cover which suggests that bison maximized their energy return by avoiding areas with deep snow (> 30 cm) that demanded intensive cratering, even when highly selected forage was accessible beneath. Avoidance of forage areas with deep snow demonstrates that wood bison employed a foraging strategy that considers both forage availability and environmental conditions, with snow depth being a limiting factor. We highlight the relationship between optimal foraging based on food availability and the trade‐offs within an energy restrictive winter season, furthering the understanding of how large herbivores forage strategically to maximize energy intake in northern environments.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70385energy maximization hypothesisforaging ecologyoptimal foraging theorywood bison |
| spellingShingle | Garrett J. Rawleigh Mark A. Edwards Darren Epperson Scott E. Nielsen Trade‐Offs Between Forage Availability, Accessibility, and Predation Risk on Winter Foraging Strategies of Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) Ecology and Evolution energy maximization hypothesis foraging ecology optimal foraging theory wood bison |
| title | Trade‐Offs Between Forage Availability, Accessibility, and Predation Risk on Winter Foraging Strategies of Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) |
| title_full | Trade‐Offs Between Forage Availability, Accessibility, and Predation Risk on Winter Foraging Strategies of Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) |
| title_fullStr | Trade‐Offs Between Forage Availability, Accessibility, and Predation Risk on Winter Foraging Strategies of Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Trade‐Offs Between Forage Availability, Accessibility, and Predation Risk on Winter Foraging Strategies of Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) |
| title_short | Trade‐Offs Between Forage Availability, Accessibility, and Predation Risk on Winter Foraging Strategies of Wood Bison (Bison bison athabascae) |
| title_sort | trade offs between forage availability accessibility and predation risk on winter foraging strategies of wood bison bison bison athabascae |
| topic | energy maximization hypothesis foraging ecology optimal foraging theory wood bison |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70385 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT garrettjrawleigh tradeoffsbetweenforageavailabilityaccessibilityandpredationriskonwinterforagingstrategiesofwoodbisonbisonbisonathabascae AT markaedwards tradeoffsbetweenforageavailabilityaccessibilityandpredationriskonwinterforagingstrategiesofwoodbisonbisonbisonathabascae AT darrenepperson tradeoffsbetweenforageavailabilityaccessibilityandpredationriskonwinterforagingstrategiesofwoodbisonbisonbisonathabascae AT scottenielsen tradeoffsbetweenforageavailabilityaccessibilityandpredationriskonwinterforagingstrategiesofwoodbisonbisonbisonathabascae |