Reform of the House of Lords: a “parliamentary version of Waiting for Godot”?

After the rapid implementation of phase one of House of Lords reform, plans for further change, or phase two of the reform, have made little progress. While there is agreement that reform is necessary, there are fundamental differences between the upper and the lower chamber as to how this should be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michael PARSONS
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Laboratoire d’Etudes et de Recherches sur le Monde Anglophone (LERMA) 2009-07-01
Series:E-REA
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/erea/943
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841552722856247296
author Michael PARSONS
author_facet Michael PARSONS
author_sort Michael PARSONS
collection DOAJ
description After the rapid implementation of phase one of House of Lords reform, plans for further change, or phase two of the reform, have made little progress. While there is agreement that reform is necessary, there are fundamental differences between the upper and the lower chamber as to how this should be achieved, especially concerning the mode of designation of members of the reformed House (appointment or election). The unsettled economic and political environment means that constitutional reform is not top on the agenda. However there have been important changes in the way the semi-reformed House of Lords has operated over the last few years. It has become much more assertive and has assumed a valuable role in preserving individual freedoms and scrutinising the constitutional implications of any proposed legislation. This poses something of a paradox in that it might be argued that the unelected upper chamber has been more concerned to preserve democratic rights than the elected House of Commons. An elected House of Lords would enjoy greater legitimacy in fulfilling this role in particular and in more generally holding the government to account.
format Article
id doaj-art-f695eec2ae844fa099a800b4667d9dea
institution Kabale University
issn 1638-1718
language English
publishDate 2009-07-01
publisher Laboratoire d’Etudes et de Recherches sur le Monde Anglophone (LERMA)
record_format Article
series E-REA
spelling doaj-art-f695eec2ae844fa099a800b4667d9dea2025-01-09T12:53:24ZengLaboratoire d’Etudes et de Recherches sur le Monde Anglophone (LERMA)E-REA1638-17182009-07-017110.4000/erea.943Reform of the House of Lords: a “parliamentary version of Waiting for Godot”?Michael PARSONSAfter the rapid implementation of phase one of House of Lords reform, plans for further change, or phase two of the reform, have made little progress. While there is agreement that reform is necessary, there are fundamental differences between the upper and the lower chamber as to how this should be achieved, especially concerning the mode of designation of members of the reformed House (appointment or election). The unsettled economic and political environment means that constitutional reform is not top on the agenda. However there have been important changes in the way the semi-reformed House of Lords has operated over the last few years. It has become much more assertive and has assumed a valuable role in preserving individual freedoms and scrutinising the constitutional implications of any proposed legislation. This poses something of a paradox in that it might be argued that the unelected upper chamber has been more concerned to preserve democratic rights than the elected House of Commons. An elected House of Lords would enjoy greater legitimacy in fulfilling this role in particular and in more generally holding the government to account.https://journals.openedition.org/erea/943democracyParliamentHouse of Lordsreformconstitutionindividual freedom
spellingShingle Michael PARSONS
Reform of the House of Lords: a “parliamentary version of Waiting for Godot”?
E-REA
democracy
Parliament
House of Lords
reform
constitution
individual freedom
title Reform of the House of Lords: a “parliamentary version of Waiting for Godot”?
title_full Reform of the House of Lords: a “parliamentary version of Waiting for Godot”?
title_fullStr Reform of the House of Lords: a “parliamentary version of Waiting for Godot”?
title_full_unstemmed Reform of the House of Lords: a “parliamentary version of Waiting for Godot”?
title_short Reform of the House of Lords: a “parliamentary version of Waiting for Godot”?
title_sort reform of the house of lords a parliamentary version of waiting for godot
topic democracy
Parliament
House of Lords
reform
constitution
individual freedom
url https://journals.openedition.org/erea/943
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelparsons reformofthehouseoflordsaparliamentaryversionofwaitingforgodot