«Chi potrebbe esplicar con parole»: il lessico dei disastri nelle relazioni di età moderna tra scarti e continuità
In this contribution we try to bring together two lines of investigation that have recently concerned historical-linguistic research on disaster reports in Italy, that is, the study of the lexicon of natural disasters and the study of the language of the news press. With an analysis conducted on a c...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
École Normale Supérieure de Lyon Editions
|
| Series: | Laboratoire Italien |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/laboratoireitalien/9565 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841549780848738304 |
|---|---|
| author | Rosa Anna Paradiso |
| author_facet | Rosa Anna Paradiso |
| author_sort | Rosa Anna Paradiso |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this contribution we try to bring together two lines of investigation that have recently concerned historical-linguistic research on disaster reports in Italy, that is, the study of the lexicon of natural disasters and the study of the language of the news press. With an analysis conducted on a corpus of seventy-five relazioni on disasters that occurred in southern Italy, published between 1538 and 1707, we particularly examine some linguistically and stylistically innovative features of reports on disasters in the early modern period. Ultimately, these elements are linked to the impossibility of describing, with traditional words and styles, an event that requires, at this chronological stage, the use of new terms and analogies: hence the use of dialect and the use of modern descriptive topoi such as those of war and spectacle. At the same time, we observe how a new discursive tradition is being created in the early modern period, exemplified on the one hand by the continuity in the use of syntagms that cannot be seen in the repertoires and the aforementioned descriptive strategies, and on the other by the affirmation of a sensationalist approach to information about the disaster. This direction –which has points in common with contemporary news– seems in turn to go hand in hand with the progressive definition, at least in the printer’s intentions, of the editorial product. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-f5ec5a8965de493584faec1ace6de03f |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1627-9204 2117-4970 |
| language | fra |
| publisher | École Normale Supérieure de Lyon Editions |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Laboratoire Italien |
| spelling | doaj-art-f5ec5a8965de493584faec1ace6de03f2025-01-10T13:01:27ZfraÉcole Normale Supérieure de Lyon EditionsLaboratoire Italien1627-92042117-49702910.4000/laboratoireitalien.9565«Chi potrebbe esplicar con parole»: il lessico dei disastri nelle relazioni di età moderna tra scarti e continuitàRosa Anna ParadisoIn this contribution we try to bring together two lines of investigation that have recently concerned historical-linguistic research on disaster reports in Italy, that is, the study of the lexicon of natural disasters and the study of the language of the news press. With an analysis conducted on a corpus of seventy-five relazioni on disasters that occurred in southern Italy, published between 1538 and 1707, we particularly examine some linguistically and stylistically innovative features of reports on disasters in the early modern period. Ultimately, these elements are linked to the impossibility of describing, with traditional words and styles, an event that requires, at this chronological stage, the use of new terms and analogies: hence the use of dialect and the use of modern descriptive topoi such as those of war and spectacle. At the same time, we observe how a new discursive tradition is being created in the early modern period, exemplified on the one hand by the continuity in the use of syntagms that cannot be seen in the repertoires and the aforementioned descriptive strategies, and on the other by the affirmation of a sensationalist approach to information about the disaster. This direction –which has points in common with contemporary news– seems in turn to go hand in hand with the progressive definition, at least in the printer’s intentions, of the editorial product.https://journals.openedition.org/laboratoireitalien/9565catastrophes naturellesoccasionnelsépoque modernelexiquestylepresse populaire |
| spellingShingle | Rosa Anna Paradiso «Chi potrebbe esplicar con parole»: il lessico dei disastri nelle relazioni di età moderna tra scarti e continuità Laboratoire Italien catastrophes naturelles occasionnels époque moderne lexique style presse populaire |
| title | «Chi potrebbe esplicar con parole»: il lessico dei disastri nelle relazioni di età moderna tra scarti e continuità |
| title_full | «Chi potrebbe esplicar con parole»: il lessico dei disastri nelle relazioni di età moderna tra scarti e continuità |
| title_fullStr | «Chi potrebbe esplicar con parole»: il lessico dei disastri nelle relazioni di età moderna tra scarti e continuità |
| title_full_unstemmed | «Chi potrebbe esplicar con parole»: il lessico dei disastri nelle relazioni di età moderna tra scarti e continuità |
| title_short | «Chi potrebbe esplicar con parole»: il lessico dei disastri nelle relazioni di età moderna tra scarti e continuità |
| title_sort | chi potrebbe esplicar con parole il lessico dei disastri nelle relazioni di eta moderna tra scarti e continuita |
| topic | catastrophes naturelles occasionnels époque moderne lexique style presse populaire |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/laboratoireitalien/9565 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT rosaannaparadiso chipotrebbeesplicarconparoleillessicodeidisastrinellerelazionidietamodernatrascartiecontinuita |