Enhancing EFL Students’ Idiomatic Competence: A Comparative Analysis of Lexical, Etymological, and Multimodal Approaches

Background: Given the importance of idiomatic expressions in second language learning on one hand and their complex lexical, syntactic, and semantic characteristics on the other hand, previous studies have proposed numerous instructional models for teaching idioms. However, despite the various inst...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sulaiman Alnujaidi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: National Research University Higher School of Economics 2025-06-01
Series:Journal of Language and Education
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jle.hse.ru/article/view/18364
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849704527608938496
author Sulaiman Alnujaidi
author_facet Sulaiman Alnujaidi
author_sort Sulaiman Alnujaidi
collection DOAJ
description Background: Given the importance of idiomatic expressions in second language learning on one hand and their complex lexical, syntactic, and semantic characteristics on the other hand, previous studies have proposed numerous instructional models for teaching idioms. However, despite the various instructional approaches available, there is a research gap comparing their effectiveness in enhancing idiomatic competence, which causes inconsistencies in teaching practices and underscores the need to identify the most effective methods for improving idiomatic competence. Purpose: To examine and compare the impact of three approaches (Lexical, Etymological, and Multimodal) on enhancing EFL students’ acquisition of idiomatic expressions and developing their overall idiomatic competence. Method:  The study used a quasi-experimental pre-test, post-test research design with three intact classes. Three groups of EFL students (n=66) were taught idiomatic expressions using different instructional approaches to compare their effectiveness. The first group (23 students) learned idioms through the Lexical Approach, the second group (22 students) through the Etymological Approach, and the third group (21 students) through the Multimodal Approach. Pre- and post-tests were administered to the three groups, and their scores were analyzed using a mixed model ANOVA to determine significant differences in within-subjects effects (changes in idiomatic competence over time) and between-subjects effects (differences among the instructional approaches: Lexical, Etymological, and Multimodal). Results: The results demonstrated that there were statistically significant differences between the three approaches (Lexical, Etymological, & Multimodal) in terms of their effects on enhancing L2 learners’ idiomatic competence. It was found that Multimodal group outperformed Lexical and Etymological groups significantly. No significant difference was found between Lexical and Etymological groups. This study suggests that the Multimodal Approach is highly effective for idiomatic competence development. Conclusion: The study concluded that EFL teachers, curriculum developers, textbook designers, and researchers could implement the potentials of the Multimodal Approach to create more effective, interactive, and authentic environments for learning idiomatic expressions. Practical implications and further research recommendations were also suggested.
format Article
id doaj-art-f5e646d0f19f4f6eae3ef93f4555f3b5
institution DOAJ
issn 2411-7390
language English
publishDate 2025-06-01
publisher National Research University Higher School of Economics
record_format Article
series Journal of Language and Education
spelling doaj-art-f5e646d0f19f4f6eae3ef93f4555f3b52025-08-20T03:16:43ZengNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsJournal of Language and Education2411-73902025-06-0111210.17323/jle.2025.18364Enhancing EFL Students’ Idiomatic Competence: A Comparative Analysis of Lexical, Etymological, and Multimodal ApproachesSulaiman Alnujaidi0Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Saudi Arabia Background: Given the importance of idiomatic expressions in second language learning on one hand and their complex lexical, syntactic, and semantic characteristics on the other hand, previous studies have proposed numerous instructional models for teaching idioms. However, despite the various instructional approaches available, there is a research gap comparing their effectiveness in enhancing idiomatic competence, which causes inconsistencies in teaching practices and underscores the need to identify the most effective methods for improving idiomatic competence. Purpose: To examine and compare the impact of three approaches (Lexical, Etymological, and Multimodal) on enhancing EFL students’ acquisition of idiomatic expressions and developing their overall idiomatic competence. Method:  The study used a quasi-experimental pre-test, post-test research design with three intact classes. Three groups of EFL students (n=66) were taught idiomatic expressions using different instructional approaches to compare their effectiveness. The first group (23 students) learned idioms through the Lexical Approach, the second group (22 students) through the Etymological Approach, and the third group (21 students) through the Multimodal Approach. Pre- and post-tests were administered to the three groups, and their scores were analyzed using a mixed model ANOVA to determine significant differences in within-subjects effects (changes in idiomatic competence over time) and between-subjects effects (differences among the instructional approaches: Lexical, Etymological, and Multimodal). Results: The results demonstrated that there were statistically significant differences between the three approaches (Lexical, Etymological, & Multimodal) in terms of their effects on enhancing L2 learners’ idiomatic competence. It was found that Multimodal group outperformed Lexical and Etymological groups significantly. No significant difference was found between Lexical and Etymological groups. This study suggests that the Multimodal Approach is highly effective for idiomatic competence development. Conclusion: The study concluded that EFL teachers, curriculum developers, textbook designers, and researchers could implement the potentials of the Multimodal Approach to create more effective, interactive, and authentic environments for learning idiomatic expressions. Practical implications and further research recommendations were also suggested. https://jle.hse.ru/article/view/18364English as a foreign language (EFL)Idiomatic Competence(SLA)Lexical Approach (LA)Etymological Approach (EA)Multimodal Approach (MA)
spellingShingle Sulaiman Alnujaidi
Enhancing EFL Students’ Idiomatic Competence: A Comparative Analysis of Lexical, Etymological, and Multimodal Approaches
Journal of Language and Education
English as a foreign language (EFL)
Idiomatic Competence
(SLA)
Lexical Approach (LA)
Etymological Approach (EA)
Multimodal Approach (MA)
title Enhancing EFL Students’ Idiomatic Competence: A Comparative Analysis of Lexical, Etymological, and Multimodal Approaches
title_full Enhancing EFL Students’ Idiomatic Competence: A Comparative Analysis of Lexical, Etymological, and Multimodal Approaches
title_fullStr Enhancing EFL Students’ Idiomatic Competence: A Comparative Analysis of Lexical, Etymological, and Multimodal Approaches
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing EFL Students’ Idiomatic Competence: A Comparative Analysis of Lexical, Etymological, and Multimodal Approaches
title_short Enhancing EFL Students’ Idiomatic Competence: A Comparative Analysis of Lexical, Etymological, and Multimodal Approaches
title_sort enhancing efl students idiomatic competence a comparative analysis of lexical etymological and multimodal approaches
topic English as a foreign language (EFL)
Idiomatic Competence
(SLA)
Lexical Approach (LA)
Etymological Approach (EA)
Multimodal Approach (MA)
url https://jle.hse.ru/article/view/18364
work_keys_str_mv AT sulaimanalnujaidi enhancingeflstudentsidiomaticcompetenceacomparativeanalysisoflexicaletymologicalandmultimodalapproaches