L’invention d’une nouvelle catégorie de classement et d’action : la “déscolarisation”, ses spécialistes et ses dispositifs
From the genesis and evolution of a “partnership” between plans of action of taking care of youth with schooling difficulties built up by school inspection of Paris Region, the author shows ordinary modes of agreement and disagreement between professionals with different and sometimes opposite “habi...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Les éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’Homme
2003-09-01
|
| Series: | Cahiers de la Recherche sur l'Education et les Savoirs |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/cres/1475 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | From the genesis and evolution of a “partnership” between plans of action of taking care of youth with schooling difficulties built up by school inspection of Paris Region, the author shows ordinary modes of agreement and disagreement between professionals with different and sometimes opposite “habitus”. Thus, considering the newly institutionalised question of “deschooling”, one can see how different professionals are seizing it and confront each other to impose their own definition and their mode of treatment – the stake being to maintain or gain positions in the field of taking care which requires expert evaluation production from different professionals, especially if a new “school question” seems to rise up. To exist as a thinking and institutional actions category, “deschooling” must lie within the scope of plans of action whose one of the task is to produce one definition of public target by asserting a “speciality” and by claiming the mono-poly of “expert evaluation”. Despite the fight between different agents of these plans of action, agreement is find on one stake: to acknowledge a room of taking care by imposing theorisation of practices experienced in the field. The analysis of institutional “partnership” situations show tendencies of point of view and favoured explanations homogenization at once and conflicts and fights around the expert evaluation power which oppose and structure the space of the “partners” who are most of the time in quest of gratefulness. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1635-3544 2265-7762 |