Using Generative AI to Identify Arguments in Judges’ Reasons: Accuracy and Benefits for Students
This study evaluates the effectiveness of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in identifying and reconstructing legal arguments from judges’ reasons in court cases, focusing on the practical implications for law students and legal educators. By examining the performance of two versions of popul...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Paul Burgess, Iwan Williams, Lizhen Qu, Weiqing Wang |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Queensland University of Technology
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | Law, Technology and Humans |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://lthj.qut.edu.au/article/view/3637 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Students’ Belief Biases Concerning Climate Change and Factors Considered While Evaluating Informal Reasoning Arguments
by: Perihan Gunes
Published: (2020-01-01) -
On the Virtue-theoretic Approach to Argument Appraisal
by: Matthew William McKeon
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Vers la construction de descriptions argumentées d’un accident de la route : analyse de diverses stratégies argumentatives
by: Sara Boutouhami, et al.
Published: (2008-06-01) -
INVESTIGATING ARGUMENT AS PRODUCT IN THE AMERICAN PRESIDENTIAL DEBATES
by: حسن مرعي, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
Automatic reasoning technology for coal mine industrial data AI models
by: ZHANG Zhixing, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01)