Regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

Abstract Background Type 1 diabetes is a serious, chronic disorder with an increasing incidence among children and adolescents. Glycemic control in individuals with type 1 diabetes is better managed through a basal-bolus regimen with either regular human or rapid-acting insulin analogues administere...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johanne Juul Petersen, Sophie Juul, Caroline Barkholt Kamp, Pascal Faltermeier, Christina Dam Bjerregaard Sillassen, Tiago Jeronimo Dos Santos, Janus Christian Jakobsen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:Systematic Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02729-4
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841544943334588416
author Johanne Juul Petersen
Sophie Juul
Caroline Barkholt Kamp
Pascal Faltermeier
Christina Dam Bjerregaard Sillassen
Tiago Jeronimo Dos Santos
Janus Christian Jakobsen
author_facet Johanne Juul Petersen
Sophie Juul
Caroline Barkholt Kamp
Pascal Faltermeier
Christina Dam Bjerregaard Sillassen
Tiago Jeronimo Dos Santos
Janus Christian Jakobsen
author_sort Johanne Juul Petersen
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Type 1 diabetes is a serious, chronic disorder with an increasing incidence among children and adolescents. Glycemic control in individuals with type 1 diabetes is better managed through a basal-bolus regimen with either regular human or rapid-acting insulin analogues administered as a bolus at mealtimes. Rapid-acting insulin analogues have been hypothesized to cause optimal glycemic control and less risk of hypoglycemic episodes compared to regular human insulins. However, this has never been systematically assessed in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Therefore, this systematic review aims to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues in children and adolescents. Methods This is a protocol for a systematic review. A search in major medical databases (e.g., MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL) and clinical trial registries will be performed by a search specialist. We will include published and unpublished randomized clinical trials comparing regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues (lispro, aspart, or glulisine). Two review authors will independently extract data and conduct risk of bias assessments. Primary outcomes will be severe hypoglycemia, ketoacidosis, and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes will be quality of life, HbA1c, and non-serious adverse events. Data will be analyzed using fixed-effect meta-analyses, random-effects meta-analyses, and Trial Sequential Analysis. Several subgroup analyses are planned. Risk of bias will be assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool—version 2, an eight-step procedure will be used to assess if the thresholds for clinical significance are crossed, and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). Discussion The beneficial and adverse effects of regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues have not been systematically assessed in children and adolescents. There is a need for a comprehensive systematic review of the current evidence. Systematic review registration PROSPERO: CRD42024508625.
format Article
id doaj-art-f518d1d261034846ad8a7ba61124f880
institution Kabale University
issn 2046-4053
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Systematic Reviews
spelling doaj-art-f518d1d261034846ad8a7ba61124f8802025-01-12T12:09:55ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532025-01-0114111110.1186/s13643-024-02729-4Regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential AnalysisJohanne Juul Petersen0Sophie Juul1Caroline Barkholt Kamp2Pascal Faltermeier3Christina Dam Bjerregaard Sillassen4Tiago Jeronimo Dos Santos5Janus Christian Jakobsen6Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Capital Region of DenmarkCentre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Capital Region of DenmarkCentre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Capital Region of DenmarkCentre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Capital Region of DenmarkCentre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Capital Region of DenmarkUnit of Pediatrics, Hospital Vithas Almería, Instituto Hispalense de PediatríaCentre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen Trial Unit, Capital Region of DenmarkAbstract Background Type 1 diabetes is a serious, chronic disorder with an increasing incidence among children and adolescents. Glycemic control in individuals with type 1 diabetes is better managed through a basal-bolus regimen with either regular human or rapid-acting insulin analogues administered as a bolus at mealtimes. Rapid-acting insulin analogues have been hypothesized to cause optimal glycemic control and less risk of hypoglycemic episodes compared to regular human insulins. However, this has never been systematically assessed in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Therefore, this systematic review aims to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues in children and adolescents. Methods This is a protocol for a systematic review. A search in major medical databases (e.g., MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL) and clinical trial registries will be performed by a search specialist. We will include published and unpublished randomized clinical trials comparing regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues (lispro, aspart, or glulisine). Two review authors will independently extract data and conduct risk of bias assessments. Primary outcomes will be severe hypoglycemia, ketoacidosis, and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes will be quality of life, HbA1c, and non-serious adverse events. Data will be analyzed using fixed-effect meta-analyses, random-effects meta-analyses, and Trial Sequential Analysis. Several subgroup analyses are planned. Risk of bias will be assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool—version 2, an eight-step procedure will be used to assess if the thresholds for clinical significance are crossed, and the certainty of the evidence will be assessed by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE). Discussion The beneficial and adverse effects of regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues have not been systematically assessed in children and adolescents. There is a need for a comprehensive systematic review of the current evidence. Systematic review registration PROSPERO: CRD42024508625.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02729-4Type 1 diabetesRegular human insulinsRapid-acting insulin analoguesChildrenAdolescentsMeta-analysis
spellingShingle Johanne Juul Petersen
Sophie Juul
Caroline Barkholt Kamp
Pascal Faltermeier
Christina Dam Bjerregaard Sillassen
Tiago Jeronimo Dos Santos
Janus Christian Jakobsen
Regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
Systematic Reviews
Type 1 diabetes
Regular human insulins
Rapid-acting insulin analogues
Children
Adolescents
Meta-analysis
title Regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
title_full Regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
title_fullStr Regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
title_short Regular human insulins versus rapid-acting insulin analogues in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a protocol for a systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis
title_sort regular human insulins versus rapid acting insulin analogues in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes a protocol for a systematic review with meta analysis and trial sequential analysis
topic Type 1 diabetes
Regular human insulins
Rapid-acting insulin analogues
Children
Adolescents
Meta-analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02729-4
work_keys_str_mv AT johannejuulpetersen regularhumaninsulinsversusrapidactinginsulinanaloguesinchildrenandadolescentswithtype1diabetesaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT sophiejuul regularhumaninsulinsversusrapidactinginsulinanaloguesinchildrenandadolescentswithtype1diabetesaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT carolinebarkholtkamp regularhumaninsulinsversusrapidactinginsulinanaloguesinchildrenandadolescentswithtype1diabetesaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT pascalfaltermeier regularhumaninsulinsversusrapidactinginsulinanaloguesinchildrenandadolescentswithtype1diabetesaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT christinadambjerregaardsillassen regularhumaninsulinsversusrapidactinginsulinanaloguesinchildrenandadolescentswithtype1diabetesaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT tiagojeronimodossantos regularhumaninsulinsversusrapidactinginsulinanaloguesinchildrenandadolescentswithtype1diabetesaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis
AT januschristianjakobsen regularhumaninsulinsversusrapidactinginsulinanaloguesinchildrenandadolescentswithtype1diabetesaprotocolforasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysisandtrialsequentialanalysis