Research in compulsory drug detention centres in China: Characteristics and ethical considerations
More than 500 centres in China hold over 300,000 individuals in what has been described by the United Nations as unethical and ineffective compulsory treatment and rehabilitation centres. Individuals in these centres face widespread human rights abuses, including lack of due process, forced labour,...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2025-12-01
|
| Series: | Global Public Health |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/17441692.2024.2447795 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1841550048039534592 |
|---|---|
| author | Yazid Barhoush Joseph J. Amon |
| author_facet | Yazid Barhoush Joseph J. Amon |
| author_sort | Yazid Barhoush |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | More than 500 centres in China hold over 300,000 individuals in what has been described by the United Nations as unethical and ineffective compulsory treatment and rehabilitation centres. Individuals in these centres face widespread human rights abuses, including lack of due process, forced labour, physical and sexual violence, and denial of healthcare. Because of the vulnerability of individuals in detention settings to abuse in research trials, ethical guidelines have required research to pose no more than minimal risk, to address the process of incarceration, and the health or well-being of detained individuals. To understand the scope and ethical protections of research conducted in Chinese drug detention centres, we conducted a literature review by searching the China Academic Journals Database for Chinese language research articles published between 2012-2021. We identified 68 articles of drug detention detainees that examined physical and psychosocial health; infectious disease prevalence; past drug use; and other topics. The majority of studies (56%) did not provide any information on the consent of research participants. Only ten (15%) studies reported receiving ethics approval. No studies examined the process or conditions of detention. Journal editors, in China and globally, should increase scrutiny of research conducted in compulsory drug detention settings. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-f482118bdcbe4b2c84b7b92bc839e29e |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1744-1692 1744-1706 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-12-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Global Public Health |
| spelling | doaj-art-f482118bdcbe4b2c84b7b92bc839e29e2025-01-10T10:45:26ZengTaylor & Francis GroupGlobal Public Health1744-16921744-17062025-12-0120110.1080/17441692.2024.2447795Research in compulsory drug detention centres in China: Characteristics and ethical considerationsYazid Barhoush0Joseph J. Amon1Department of Community Health and Prevention, Drexel Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USADepartment of Community Health and Prevention, Drexel Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA, USAMore than 500 centres in China hold over 300,000 individuals in what has been described by the United Nations as unethical and ineffective compulsory treatment and rehabilitation centres. Individuals in these centres face widespread human rights abuses, including lack of due process, forced labour, physical and sexual violence, and denial of healthcare. Because of the vulnerability of individuals in detention settings to abuse in research trials, ethical guidelines have required research to pose no more than minimal risk, to address the process of incarceration, and the health or well-being of detained individuals. To understand the scope and ethical protections of research conducted in Chinese drug detention centres, we conducted a literature review by searching the China Academic Journals Database for Chinese language research articles published between 2012-2021. We identified 68 articles of drug detention detainees that examined physical and psychosocial health; infectious disease prevalence; past drug use; and other topics. The majority of studies (56%) did not provide any information on the consent of research participants. Only ten (15%) studies reported receiving ethics approval. No studies examined the process or conditions of detention. Journal editors, in China and globally, should increase scrutiny of research conducted in compulsory drug detention settings.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/17441692.2024.2447795Ethicsdrugdetentionaddictionhuman rightsSDG 3: Good health and well-being |
| spellingShingle | Yazid Barhoush Joseph J. Amon Research in compulsory drug detention centres in China: Characteristics and ethical considerations Global Public Health Ethics drug detention addiction human rights SDG 3: Good health and well-being |
| title | Research in compulsory drug detention centres in China: Characteristics and ethical considerations |
| title_full | Research in compulsory drug detention centres in China: Characteristics and ethical considerations |
| title_fullStr | Research in compulsory drug detention centres in China: Characteristics and ethical considerations |
| title_full_unstemmed | Research in compulsory drug detention centres in China: Characteristics and ethical considerations |
| title_short | Research in compulsory drug detention centres in China: Characteristics and ethical considerations |
| title_sort | research in compulsory drug detention centres in china characteristics and ethical considerations |
| topic | Ethics drug detention addiction human rights SDG 3: Good health and well-being |
| url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/17441692.2024.2447795 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yazidbarhoush researchincompulsorydrugdetentioncentresinchinacharacteristicsandethicalconsiderations AT josephjamon researchincompulsorydrugdetentioncentresinchinacharacteristicsandethicalconsiderations |