Attractiveness of a City as a Factor of Territorial Mobility in Student Estimates (on the Example of Ekaterinburg)

Introduction. The attractiveness of the city as a place to live and fulfill needs becomes one of the determining factors for the intensification of territorial mobility among young people. The image of the city and the image of the “future” are closely related and interdependent in consciousness of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. B. Abramova, N. L. Antonova, O. I. Pimenova
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University 2019-02-01
Series:Obrazovanie i Nauka
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.edscience.ru/jour/article/view/1096
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846156062301880320
author S. B. Abramova
N. L. Antonova
O. I. Pimenova
author_facet S. B. Abramova
N. L. Antonova
O. I. Pimenova
author_sort S. B. Abramova
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. The attractiveness of the city as a place to live and fulfill needs becomes one of the determining factors for the intensification of territorial mobility among young people. The image of the city and the image of the “future” are closely related and interdependent in consciousness of young people. Megalopolis as a high-resource territory is a special space for the implementation of students’ life plans. Hence, it is important to pay special attention to students as a potential driver for the development of the territory (city, region, country), creating an attractive urban environment.Aim. Taking into account the results of a sociological study, the aims of the publication were the following: to analyse the attractiveness of the city, to characterise its place in the life planning of students and to determine the role in territorial movements.Methodology and research methods. The empirical basis of the study was a semi-standardised questionnaire for students of 3–4 courses at 9 universities in Ekaterinburg (n = 200), and in-depth interviews with students representing different types of orientations to territorial mobility (n = 8). Collected data were processed by means of a method of thematic networks.Results and scientific novelty. According to respondents, the factors, which provide comfort of life in the city, are considered; competitive advantages and shortcomings of the environment of the megalopolis are characterised; it is shown how its specific characteristics are reflected in vital plans of students. Two idealised ideas of the city as the place for life are allocated: 1) a “comfortable” city for everyday practices and open for innovations and creativity; 2) an “instrumental” city as the platform for career development and material welfare, which can be emotionally unattractive, but functionally effective. The factor constraining territorial mobility is the reproduction of social connections and relations in the current residence area; students view the movement as a type of risky behaviour. However, 42% of respondents include in their life plans a move to another city, located both in Russia and abroad. In the motivational structure of territorial mobility, the leading positions are occupied by the desire for independence, the idealised image of the city planned for life, and the discrepancy between the conditions of a particular city and the actual needs of the young generation. Hence, the strategic direction of planning and designing urban space is the increase in the socio-cultural, economic, and environmental sustainability of the territory. Administrative structures as the agents, initiating, introducing and regulating the complex strategy of increase in attractiveness of the territory, need to consider not only the territorial capital, which the megalopolis has, but also typical needs and interests of the target social groups, especially those related to the creative class.Practical significance. The presented materials and the authors’ conclusions can be used to determine the priority directions of the development of urban environment and intra-urban youth policy and to develop programmes for forming students’ competencies related to life planning and territorial mobility.
format Article
id doaj-art-f45c2c7750bb46d09506ceeb5660d9d0
institution Kabale University
issn 1994-5639
2310-5828
language Russian
publishDate 2019-02-01
publisher Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University
record_format Article
series Obrazovanie i Nauka
spelling doaj-art-f45c2c7750bb46d09506ceeb5660d9d02024-11-26T10:37:24ZrusRussian State Vocational Pedagogical UniversityObrazovanie i Nauka1994-56392310-58282019-02-012119712310.17853/1994-5639-2019-1-97-123770Attractiveness of a City as a Factor of Territorial Mobility in Student Estimates (on the Example of Ekaterinburg)S. B. Abramova0N. L. Antonova1O. I. Pimenova2Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. YeltsinUral Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. YeltsinUral Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. YeltsinIntroduction. The attractiveness of the city as a place to live and fulfill needs becomes one of the determining factors for the intensification of territorial mobility among young people. The image of the city and the image of the “future” are closely related and interdependent in consciousness of young people. Megalopolis as a high-resource territory is a special space for the implementation of students’ life plans. Hence, it is important to pay special attention to students as a potential driver for the development of the territory (city, region, country), creating an attractive urban environment.Aim. Taking into account the results of a sociological study, the aims of the publication were the following: to analyse the attractiveness of the city, to characterise its place in the life planning of students and to determine the role in territorial movements.Methodology and research methods. The empirical basis of the study was a semi-standardised questionnaire for students of 3–4 courses at 9 universities in Ekaterinburg (n = 200), and in-depth interviews with students representing different types of orientations to territorial mobility (n = 8). Collected data were processed by means of a method of thematic networks.Results and scientific novelty. According to respondents, the factors, which provide comfort of life in the city, are considered; competitive advantages and shortcomings of the environment of the megalopolis are characterised; it is shown how its specific characteristics are reflected in vital plans of students. Two idealised ideas of the city as the place for life are allocated: 1) a “comfortable” city for everyday practices and open for innovations and creativity; 2) an “instrumental” city as the platform for career development and material welfare, which can be emotionally unattractive, but functionally effective. The factor constraining territorial mobility is the reproduction of social connections and relations in the current residence area; students view the movement as a type of risky behaviour. However, 42% of respondents include in their life plans a move to another city, located both in Russia and abroad. In the motivational structure of territorial mobility, the leading positions are occupied by the desire for independence, the idealised image of the city planned for life, and the discrepancy between the conditions of a particular city and the actual needs of the young generation. Hence, the strategic direction of planning and designing urban space is the increase in the socio-cultural, economic, and environmental sustainability of the territory. Administrative structures as the agents, initiating, introducing and regulating the complex strategy of increase in attractiveness of the territory, need to consider not only the territorial capital, which the megalopolis has, but also typical needs and interests of the target social groups, especially those related to the creative class.Practical significance. The presented materials and the authors’ conclusions can be used to determine the priority directions of the development of urban environment and intra-urban youth policy and to develop programmes for forming students’ competencies related to life planning and territorial mobility.https://www.edscience.ru/jour/article/view/1096citymegalopolisattractiveness of the citystudentsterritorial mobilitylife planning
spellingShingle S. B. Abramova
N. L. Antonova
O. I. Pimenova
Attractiveness of a City as a Factor of Territorial Mobility in Student Estimates (on the Example of Ekaterinburg)
Obrazovanie i Nauka
city
megalopolis
attractiveness of the city
students
territorial mobility
life planning
title Attractiveness of a City as a Factor of Territorial Mobility in Student Estimates (on the Example of Ekaterinburg)
title_full Attractiveness of a City as a Factor of Territorial Mobility in Student Estimates (on the Example of Ekaterinburg)
title_fullStr Attractiveness of a City as a Factor of Territorial Mobility in Student Estimates (on the Example of Ekaterinburg)
title_full_unstemmed Attractiveness of a City as a Factor of Territorial Mobility in Student Estimates (on the Example of Ekaterinburg)
title_short Attractiveness of a City as a Factor of Territorial Mobility in Student Estimates (on the Example of Ekaterinburg)
title_sort attractiveness of a city as a factor of territorial mobility in student estimates on the example of ekaterinburg
topic city
megalopolis
attractiveness of the city
students
territorial mobility
life planning
url https://www.edscience.ru/jour/article/view/1096
work_keys_str_mv AT sbabramova attractivenessofacityasafactorofterritorialmobilityinstudentestimatesontheexampleofekaterinburg
AT nlantonova attractivenessofacityasafactorofterritorialmobilityinstudentestimatesontheexampleofekaterinburg
AT oipimenova attractivenessofacityasafactorofterritorialmobilityinstudentestimatesontheexampleofekaterinburg