Why Teaching Matters and Technology Doesn't: An Evaluation and Review of Web-based Lectures (Flexible Delivery in a First Year Law Subject, Part II)
Graduate attributes may be broadly defined as the qualities, capabilities and understandings of a graduate which a university community agrees students should develop during their time at the institution, both for their future professions and to make a contribution as ordinary citizens. This article...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Bond University
2000-01-01
|
| Series: | Legal Education Review |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6319 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1849329251817357312 |
|---|---|
| author | Lawrence McNamara |
| author_facet | Lawrence McNamara |
| author_sort | Lawrence McNamara |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Graduate attributes may be broadly defined as the qualities, capabilities and understandings of a graduate which a university community agrees students should develop during their time at the institution, both for their future professions and to make a contribution as ordinary citizens. This article examines the benefits and disadvantages of an integrated and incremental approach to developing these attributes, and to teaching the generic and legally specific skills that underpin them in an undergraduate law program. The progress toward the integration of both generic and lawyering skills within the undergraduate law program at the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) will be used as the exemplar for this article. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-f3ef5e769afb4f4fb726d6083a060ca1 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1033-2839 1839-3713 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2000-01-01 |
| publisher | Bond University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Legal Education Review |
| spelling | doaj-art-f3ef5e769afb4f4fb726d6083a060ca12025-08-20T03:47:19ZengBond UniversityLegal Education Review1033-28391839-37132000-01-0111210.53300/001c.6319Why Teaching Matters and Technology Doesn't: An Evaluation and Review of Web-based Lectures (Flexible Delivery in a First Year Law Subject, Part II)Lawrence McNamaraGraduate attributes may be broadly defined as the qualities, capabilities and understandings of a graduate which a university community agrees students should develop during their time at the institution, both for their future professions and to make a contribution as ordinary citizens. This article examines the benefits and disadvantages of an integrated and incremental approach to developing these attributes, and to teaching the generic and legally specific skills that underpin them in an undergraduate law program. The progress toward the integration of both generic and lawyering skills within the undergraduate law program at the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) will be used as the exemplar for this article.https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6319 |
| spellingShingle | Lawrence McNamara Why Teaching Matters and Technology Doesn't: An Evaluation and Review of Web-based Lectures (Flexible Delivery in a First Year Law Subject, Part II) Legal Education Review |
| title | Why Teaching Matters and Technology Doesn't: An Evaluation and Review of Web-based Lectures (Flexible Delivery in a First Year Law Subject, Part II) |
| title_full | Why Teaching Matters and Technology Doesn't: An Evaluation and Review of Web-based Lectures (Flexible Delivery in a First Year Law Subject, Part II) |
| title_fullStr | Why Teaching Matters and Technology Doesn't: An Evaluation and Review of Web-based Lectures (Flexible Delivery in a First Year Law Subject, Part II) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Why Teaching Matters and Technology Doesn't: An Evaluation and Review of Web-based Lectures (Flexible Delivery in a First Year Law Subject, Part II) |
| title_short | Why Teaching Matters and Technology Doesn't: An Evaluation and Review of Web-based Lectures (Flexible Delivery in a First Year Law Subject, Part II) |
| title_sort | why teaching matters and technology doesn t an evaluation and review of web based lectures flexible delivery in a first year law subject part ii |
| url | https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6319 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lawrencemcnamara whyteachingmattersandtechnologydoesntanevaluationandreviewofwebbasedlecturesflexibledeliveryinafirstyearlawsubjectpartii |