Effects of prescreening for likelihood ratio approaches in the forensic identification of source problems

Source prescreening is a methodology where forensic examiners select samples that are similar to given trace evidence to represent the background population. This background evidence helps assign a value of evidence using a likelihood ratio or Bayes factor. A potential benefit of prescreening is a m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dylan Borchert, Semhar Michael, Andrew Simpson, Christopher P. Saunders, Larry Tang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-01-01
Series:Forensic Science International: Synergy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X24001074
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1846121286457098240
author Dylan Borchert
Semhar Michael
Andrew Simpson
Christopher P. Saunders
Larry Tang
author_facet Dylan Borchert
Semhar Michael
Andrew Simpson
Christopher P. Saunders
Larry Tang
author_sort Dylan Borchert
collection DOAJ
description Source prescreening is a methodology where forensic examiners select samples that are similar to given trace evidence to represent the background population. This background evidence helps assign a value of evidence using a likelihood ratio or Bayes factor. A potential benefit of prescreening is a mitigation of effects from subpopulation structures within the alternative source population by isolating the relevant subpopulation. This paper examines the impact of prescreening before assigning evidence value. Extensive simulations with synthetic and real data, including trace element and fingerprint score examples, were conducted. The findings indicate that when the subpopulation structure is known, prescreening can provide an accurate evidence value in cases of subpopulation structures. The study suggests that prescreening can be beneficial, but the prescreening method and level should be transparently reported alongside the evidence value.
format Article
id doaj-art-f3412a98f34b4d6e8cde1de9f6874348
institution Kabale University
issn 2589-871X
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Forensic Science International: Synergy
spelling doaj-art-f3412a98f34b4d6e8cde1de9f68743482024-12-16T05:36:52ZengElsevierForensic Science International: Synergy2589-871X2024-01-019100560Effects of prescreening for likelihood ratio approaches in the forensic identification of source problemsDylan Borchert0Semhar Michael1Andrew Simpson2Christopher P. Saunders3Larry Tang4South Dakota State University, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Brookings, SD, United StatesSouth Dakota State University, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Brookings, SD, United States; Corresponding author.South Dakota State University, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Brookings, SD, United StatesSouth Dakota State University, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Brookings, SD, United StatesUniversity of Central Florida, Statistics and Data Science, Orlando, FL, United States; Rehabilitation Medicine Department, NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD, United StatesSource prescreening is a methodology where forensic examiners select samples that are similar to given trace evidence to represent the background population. This background evidence helps assign a value of evidence using a likelihood ratio or Bayes factor. A potential benefit of prescreening is a mitigation of effects from subpopulation structures within the alternative source population by isolating the relevant subpopulation. This paper examines the impact of prescreening before assigning evidence value. Extensive simulations with synthetic and real data, including trace element and fingerprint score examples, were conducted. The findings indicate that when the subpopulation structure is known, prescreening can provide an accurate evidence value in cases of subpopulation structures. The study suggests that prescreening can be beneficial, but the prescreening method and level should be transparently reported alongside the evidence value.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X24001074Value of evidenceLikelihood ratioRelevant source populationPrescreeningLatent subpopulation structures
spellingShingle Dylan Borchert
Semhar Michael
Andrew Simpson
Christopher P. Saunders
Larry Tang
Effects of prescreening for likelihood ratio approaches in the forensic identification of source problems
Forensic Science International: Synergy
Value of evidence
Likelihood ratio
Relevant source population
Prescreening
Latent subpopulation structures
title Effects of prescreening for likelihood ratio approaches in the forensic identification of source problems
title_full Effects of prescreening for likelihood ratio approaches in the forensic identification of source problems
title_fullStr Effects of prescreening for likelihood ratio approaches in the forensic identification of source problems
title_full_unstemmed Effects of prescreening for likelihood ratio approaches in the forensic identification of source problems
title_short Effects of prescreening for likelihood ratio approaches in the forensic identification of source problems
title_sort effects of prescreening for likelihood ratio approaches in the forensic identification of source problems
topic Value of evidence
Likelihood ratio
Relevant source population
Prescreening
Latent subpopulation structures
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X24001074
work_keys_str_mv AT dylanborchert effectsofprescreeningforlikelihoodratioapproachesintheforensicidentificationofsourceproblems
AT semharmichael effectsofprescreeningforlikelihoodratioapproachesintheforensicidentificationofsourceproblems
AT andrewsimpson effectsofprescreeningforlikelihoodratioapproachesintheforensicidentificationofsourceproblems
AT christopherpsaunders effectsofprescreeningforlikelihoodratioapproachesintheforensicidentificationofsourceproblems
AT larrytang effectsofprescreeningforlikelihoodratioapproachesintheforensicidentificationofsourceproblems