Impact and prospects of reproductive biotechnologies on swine production in South America
In the evaluation of reproductive biotechnologies in pigs in South America, 72 key articles were selected through a comprehensive literature review and a sampling formula was used to ensure representativeness. Data collected from databases such as Scopus and Web of Science, assessed with a Likert s...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/26006 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1846115278512979968 |
|---|---|
| author | Keyro Alberto Meléndez Victor Alberto Ramos |
| author_facet | Keyro Alberto Meléndez Victor Alberto Ramos |
| author_sort | Keyro Alberto Meléndez |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
In the evaluation of reproductive biotechnologies in pigs in South America, 72 key articles were selected through a comprehensive literature review and a sampling formula was used to ensure representativeness. Data collected from databases such as Scopus and Web of Science, assessed with a Likert scale and a reliability of 70.1% according to Cronbach's Alpha, reveal that artificial insemination (AI) is the most widely adopted technique, with more than 90% of commercial farms using it. In contrast, embryo transfer (ET) and in vitro fertilization (IVF) show limited adoption, with only 10% of farms applying them due to high costs and low efficiency. Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) indicates that 55% of publications focus on AI and ET, while only 25% address IVF. The perception of information quality shows that 70% consider articles on AI to be clear, compared to only 40% for IVF. In conclusion, while AI remains prevalent and effective, adoption of ET and IVF faces significant barriers, suggesting an urgent need to improve the accessibility and efficiency of these advanced technologies and strengthen research in less-covered areas.
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-f1b3ab7d359c40d58c8a9f7a952f66db |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2238-1171 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias |
| spelling | doaj-art-f1b3ab7d359c40d58c8a9f7a952f66db2024-12-19T16:12:53ZengUniversidade do Estado de Santa CatarinaRevista de Ciências Agroveterinárias2238-11712024-12-0123410.5965/223811712342024625Impact and prospects of reproductive biotechnologies on swine production in South AmericaKeyro Alberto Meléndez0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5045-6511Victor Alberto Ramos1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9830-2386Universidad Nacional Micaela Bastidas de Apurimac Universidad Nacional Micaela Bastidas de Apurimac In the evaluation of reproductive biotechnologies in pigs in South America, 72 key articles were selected through a comprehensive literature review and a sampling formula was used to ensure representativeness. Data collected from databases such as Scopus and Web of Science, assessed with a Likert scale and a reliability of 70.1% according to Cronbach's Alpha, reveal that artificial insemination (AI) is the most widely adopted technique, with more than 90% of commercial farms using it. In contrast, embryo transfer (ET) and in vitro fertilization (IVF) show limited adoption, with only 10% of farms applying them due to high costs and low efficiency. Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) indicates that 55% of publications focus on AI and ET, while only 25% address IVF. The perception of information quality shows that 70% consider articles on AI to be clear, compared to only 40% for IVF. In conclusion, while AI remains prevalent and effective, adoption of ET and IVF faces significant barriers, suggesting an urgent need to improve the accessibility and efficiency of these advanced technologies and strengthen research in less-covered areas. https://www.periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/26006swineinseminationgenetic improvementembryos. |
| spellingShingle | Keyro Alberto Meléndez Victor Alberto Ramos Impact and prospects of reproductive biotechnologies on swine production in South America Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias swine insemination genetic improvement embryos. |
| title | Impact and prospects of reproductive biotechnologies on swine production in South America |
| title_full | Impact and prospects of reproductive biotechnologies on swine production in South America |
| title_fullStr | Impact and prospects of reproductive biotechnologies on swine production in South America |
| title_full_unstemmed | Impact and prospects of reproductive biotechnologies on swine production in South America |
| title_short | Impact and prospects of reproductive biotechnologies on swine production in South America |
| title_sort | impact and prospects of reproductive biotechnologies on swine production in south america |
| topic | swine insemination genetic improvement embryos. |
| url | https://www.periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/26006 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT keyroalbertomelendez impactandprospectsofreproductivebiotechnologiesonswineproductioninsouthamerica AT victoralbertoramos impactandprospectsofreproductivebiotechnologiesonswineproductioninsouthamerica |