Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-treatment reduced left ventricular function

Abstract Aims Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment outcomes. However, the response varies across different populations, and their use may lead to life-threatening cardiovascular (CV) events. While pre-treatment reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maor Tzuberi, Rafael Y. Brzezinski, Nir Flint, Moaad Slieman, Lior Zornitzki, Dana Viskin, Anna Rozenfeld Hemed, Barliz Waissengrin, Renana Barak, Inbal Golomb, Ido Wolf, Netanel Golan, Yan Topilsky, Shmuel Banai, Livia Kapusta, Michal Laufer-Perl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-01-01
Series:Cardio-Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-024-00297-z
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1841544251192639488
author Maor Tzuberi
Rafael Y. Brzezinski
Nir Flint
Moaad Slieman
Lior Zornitzki
Dana Viskin
Anna Rozenfeld Hemed
Barliz Waissengrin
Renana Barak
Inbal Golomb
Ido Wolf
Netanel Golan
Yan Topilsky
Shmuel Banai
Livia Kapusta
Michal Laufer-Perl
author_facet Maor Tzuberi
Rafael Y. Brzezinski
Nir Flint
Moaad Slieman
Lior Zornitzki
Dana Viskin
Anna Rozenfeld Hemed
Barliz Waissengrin
Renana Barak
Inbal Golomb
Ido Wolf
Netanel Golan
Yan Topilsky
Shmuel Banai
Livia Kapusta
Michal Laufer-Perl
author_sort Maor Tzuberi
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aims Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment outcomes. However, the response varies across different populations, and their use may lead to life-threatening cardiovascular (CV) events. While pre-treatment reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is considered a marker for high-risk cardiotoxicity and a contraindication for anthracycline and HER2-targeted therapies, there is limited evidence on the safety and efficacy of ICIs therapy in patients presenting with pre-treatment reduced LVEF. The study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ICIs therapy in patients with pre-treatment reduced LVEF. Methods Retrospective single center cohort of patients treated with ICIs therapy, who performed pre-treatment LVEF assessment. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the safety of ICIs among this population, assessed by CV events (composite of myocarditis, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, and arrhythmias). The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs, assessed by all-cause mortality and progression-free survival (PFS). Results The cohort included 307 patients, with 30 (10%) presenting with pre-treatment reduced LVEF, with a mean LVEF of 39 ± 7%. While a significantly higher incidence of CV events was observed in the reduced LVEF group (37% vs. 14%, p = 0.004), following a multivariate Cox regression analysis including baseline CV diseases and risk factors, pre-treatment reduced LVEF did not remain a significant independent predictor (p = 0.358). No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding all-cause mortality and PFS. Conclusions Pre-treatment reduced LVEF was not identified as an independent marker for clinical outcomes in patients treated with ICIs therapy.
format Article
id doaj-art-f15c265d692e4fa8915faac4b5ef52f6
institution Kabale University
issn 2057-3804
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Cardio-Oncology
spelling doaj-art-f15c265d692e4fa8915faac4b5ef52f62025-01-12T12:41:41ZengBMCCardio-Oncology2057-38042025-01-0111111010.1186/s40959-024-00297-zSafety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-treatment reduced left ventricular functionMaor Tzuberi0Rafael Y. Brzezinski1Nir Flint2Moaad Slieman3Lior Zornitzki4Dana Viskin5Anna Rozenfeld Hemed6Barliz Waissengrin7Renana Barak8Inbal Golomb9Ido Wolf10Netanel Golan11Yan Topilsky12Shmuel Banai13Livia Kapusta14Michal Laufer-Perl15 Division of Cardiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky medical Center Division of Cardiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky medical Center Division of Cardiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky medical Center Division of Cardiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky medical Center Division of Cardiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky medical Center Division of Cardiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky medical Center Division of Cardiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky medical Center Division of Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Division of Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Division of Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Division of Oncology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Division of Cardiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky medical Center Division of Cardiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky medical Center Division of Cardiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky medical CenterPediatric Cardiology Unit, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Division of Cardiology, Tel Aviv Sourasky medical CenterAbstract Aims Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment outcomes. However, the response varies across different populations, and their use may lead to life-threatening cardiovascular (CV) events. While pre-treatment reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is considered a marker for high-risk cardiotoxicity and a contraindication for anthracycline and HER2-targeted therapies, there is limited evidence on the safety and efficacy of ICIs therapy in patients presenting with pre-treatment reduced LVEF. The study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ICIs therapy in patients with pre-treatment reduced LVEF. Methods Retrospective single center cohort of patients treated with ICIs therapy, who performed pre-treatment LVEF assessment. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the safety of ICIs among this population, assessed by CV events (composite of myocarditis, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, and arrhythmias). The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs, assessed by all-cause mortality and progression-free survival (PFS). Results The cohort included 307 patients, with 30 (10%) presenting with pre-treatment reduced LVEF, with a mean LVEF of 39 ± 7%. While a significantly higher incidence of CV events was observed in the reduced LVEF group (37% vs. 14%, p = 0.004), following a multivariate Cox regression analysis including baseline CV diseases and risk factors, pre-treatment reduced LVEF did not remain a significant independent predictor (p = 0.358). No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding all-cause mortality and PFS. Conclusions Pre-treatment reduced LVEF was not identified as an independent marker for clinical outcomes in patients treated with ICIs therapy.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-024-00297-zLVEFImmune checkpoint inhibitorICIsImmunotherapyCardiotoxicityCardio-oncology
spellingShingle Maor Tzuberi
Rafael Y. Brzezinski
Nir Flint
Moaad Slieman
Lior Zornitzki
Dana Viskin
Anna Rozenfeld Hemed
Barliz Waissengrin
Renana Barak
Inbal Golomb
Ido Wolf
Netanel Golan
Yan Topilsky
Shmuel Banai
Livia Kapusta
Michal Laufer-Perl
Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-treatment reduced left ventricular function
Cardio-Oncology
LVEF
Immune checkpoint inhibitor
ICIs
Immunotherapy
Cardiotoxicity
Cardio-oncology
title Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-treatment reduced left ventricular function
title_full Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-treatment reduced left ventricular function
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-treatment reduced left ventricular function
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-treatment reduced left ventricular function
title_short Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-treatment reduced left ventricular function
title_sort safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre treatment reduced left ventricular function
topic LVEF
Immune checkpoint inhibitor
ICIs
Immunotherapy
Cardiotoxicity
Cardio-oncology
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40959-024-00297-z
work_keys_str_mv AT maortzuberi safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithpretreatmentreducedleftventricularfunction
AT rafaelybrzezinski safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithpretreatmentreducedleftventricularfunction
AT nirflint safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithpretreatmentreducedleftventricularfunction
AT moaadslieman safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithpretreatmentreducedleftventricularfunction
AT liorzornitzki safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithpretreatmentreducedleftventricularfunction
AT danaviskin safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithpretreatmentreducedleftventricularfunction
AT annarozenfeldhemed safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithpretreatmentreducedleftventricularfunction
AT barlizwaissengrin safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithpretreatmentreducedleftventricularfunction
AT renanabarak safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithpretreatmentreducedleftventricularfunction
AT inbalgolomb safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithpretreatmentreducedleftventricularfunction
AT idowolf safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithpretreatmentreducedleftventricularfunction
AT netanelgolan safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithpretreatmentreducedleftventricularfunction
AT yantopilsky safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithpretreatmentreducedleftventricularfunction
AT shmuelbanai safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithpretreatmentreducedleftventricularfunction
AT liviakapusta safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithpretreatmentreducedleftventricularfunction
AT michallauferperl safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsinpatientswithpretreatmentreducedleftventricularfunction